IP
IndiaPulse

Yes Bank Limited (YESBANK)

Mid Cap

Financial Services stocks · Mid cap · NSE

Yes Bank is a new-generation Indian private sector bank offering corporate, institutional, retail, MSME, transaction banking, and treasury services. Headquartered in Mumbai, it operates over 1300 branches, 200+ BCBOs, and 1350+ ATMs across 300 districts, with an IBU at GIFT City and a representative office in Abu Dhabi.

₹22.5
-0.04 · -0.18%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage12/14 · 86%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Financial Services P/E 18.5 (n=240)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
WATCHLIST
42

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
68

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
52

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
stable
75

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Good · 55/100

Rev +6% YoY · PAT +33% YoY · +5% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 18 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹8,054 Cr+5.9%+5.1%
EBITDANDFNDFNDF
Operating marginNDFNDFNDF
PAT₹1,072 Cr+32.5%-0.9%
PAT margin13.3%+267 bps-81 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-07-19T07:20:41.405Z
Management commentary snapshot

YESBANK reports strong Q1FY27 with PAT up 33.7% YoY to INR 1,071 Crs, driven by 18.3% YoY advances growth and improved asset quality (GNPA 1.3%, NNPA 0.2%). NIM expanded 20 bps YoY to 2.7%, and cost-to-income improved to 62.8%. Rating upgrades from Moody's, CARE, ICRA, and S&P Global provide external validation.

The bank shows broad-based growth in advances and deposits, coupled with significant asset quality improvement and cost efficiency gains. Rating upgrades validate the strengthening franchise. While QoQ deposit growth was negative, the YoY trend is strong, and management's focus on core earnings and resilience is positive.

Current business mix

Advances Mix by Segment (Q1FY27)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 3 reported categories.

Businessmix
Retail Banking45.0%
Commercial Banking24.0%
Corporate & Institutional Banking31.0%
Growth engines

Retail Assets Disbursement

Positive

Sustained momentum in Retail Assets with Q1FY27 disbursement growing 27.5% Y-o-Y.

Corporate & Institutional Banking Advances

Positive

Corporate & Institutional Banking advances posted robust 13.9% Q-o-Q growth and 41.4% YoY.

Commercial Banking Advances

Positive

Commercial Banking Advances sustained momentum with 16.9% Y-o-Y growth.

Core Fee Income

Positive

Core Fee growth at 18.7% Y-o-Y.

Capacity and execution

Branch & BCBO Network

Positive

Network Footprint stands at 1,335 branches and 249 BCBO outlets, up 6.5% YoY in total.

Tailwinds

Credit Rating Upgrades

Positive

Received Credit Rating Upgrades from Moody’s, CARE, ICRA; Inaugural Rating of BB+ from S&P Global.

Lower Cost of Deposits

Positive

Cost of Deposits for Q1FY27 lower 50bps Y-o-Y & 10bps Q-o-Q at 5.4%.

Strong Institutional Sponsorship

Positive

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) became YES Bank’s largest shareholder through the acquisition of 24.9% stake.

Headwinds

Lower Gains from Security Receipts & Treasury

Negative

Net Profit... despite significantly lower P&L Gains from Security Receipts and treasury fell sharply.

Deposits Q-o-Q Decline

Negative

Total Deposits at INR 3,15,373 Crs registered -1.1% Q-o-Q growth.

Yield on Advances Decline

Negative

Yield on Advances at 9.1% v/s 9.2% Q4FY26 and 9.9% Q1FY26.

Risk radar

Increase in Provision for NPA

Negative

Provision for Non Performing Advances was INR 507 Crs in Q1FY27, up 492.9% Q-o-Q from INR 85 Crs in Q4FY26.

Retail Advances Mix Shift

Negative

Retail Banking mix at 45% v/s. 49% in Q1FY26, indicating a shift away from this segment.

CASA Ratio Decline QoQ

Negative

CASA Ratio at 32.7% v/s 35.1% in Q4FY26, indicating a sequential weakening in low-cost funding.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

Financial services performance is influenced by both seasonal factors (YoY) and sequential momentum (QoQ) in disbursements, asset quality, and funding costs. Analyzing both provides a comprehensive view of the bank's trajectory.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Advances Growth

Positive

Advances Growth at 18.3% Y-o-Y and 4.3% Q-o-Q.

Disbursements

Positive

Continued momentum in Retail Assets Disbursement, up 27.5% Y-o-Y. Q1FY27 disbursements were INR 33,945 Crs, grew 3.0% Q-o-Q.

NIM

Positive

NIM at 2.7% (up 20 bps Y-o-Y) v/s 2.5% in Q1FY26 & 2.7% in Q4FY26.

Cost of Deposits

Positive

Cost of Deposits for Q1FY27 lower 50bps Y-o-Y & 10bps Q-o-Q at 5.4%.

Management forward view

Deepen the Core

Neutral

Our focus is clear: deepen the core, sustain profitability, and create a resilient franchise.

Sustain Profitability

Positive

We delivered higher core earnings even as gains from Security Receipts and treasury fell sharply - clear evidence that the underlying franchise is strengthening.

Create Resilient Franchise

Neutral

create a resilient franchise that delivers lasting value for every stakeholder.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
CASA Ratio32.7%Sequential improvement in CASA ratio to reduce funding costs and enhance stability.
Retail SlippagesINR 843 Crs (2.7% of Advances), lowest in 10 quartersContinued reduction in retail slippages and sustained asset quality improvement across segments.
Provision for NPAINR 507 Crs (up 492.9% QoQ)Explanation for the sharp QoQ increase in NPA provisions despite stable GNPA/NNPA ratios.
Retail & Branch Led Deposits Share59.2% of Total DepositsSustained growth and increasing share of granular retail and branch-led deposits.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

52Neutral

SMA20 -2.2% / mo · MACD +

Stock trend: 52
Sector RS:

Technical chart

YESBANKdaily · 1Y · AUTO+11.2%
Latest close ₹22.50 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.1%
RSI
47
MACD hist
0.01
52W pos
62%
2026-09-04O ₹22.47H ₹22.62L ₹22.44C ₹22.50Vol 3.2Cr sh
₹16.77₹19.13₹21.49₹23.85₹26.2152H52L22.502026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 47. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 falling (~2.2% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 47 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 13% off 52W high · 31% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

61
RS percentile
Stage 3 Topping
1M return
-0.8%
3M return
-3.7%
6M return
+16.5%
1Y return
+7.1%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
-5
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#10
Stage evidence
  • 11.7% below the 52-week closing high after prior strength.
  • The 30-week proxy has stalled (+0.5% over 20 sessions).
  • Price has not yet confirmed a full Stage 4 downtrend.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price above
Sector
neutral
Industry
neutral
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 116.65-0.18%
98107116125134Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 26117
RS vs Nifty 500117

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 42 · WATCHLIST · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

42U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

WATCHLIST
Valuation8/30
Growth21/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet1/15
Cash Flow9/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
42

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

42/100 · WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 23.0%.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 31.9%.
  • Cash flow contributes 9/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.5, in distress territory.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 1/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Bank valuation: P/B adjusted for ROE and asset quality

Banks are balance-sheet businesses, so book value quality matters more than simple earnings multiples.

Bank P/B
Primary lens
Price/book and ROE/ROA, not trailing PE alone.
Secondary checks
Capital adequacy, credit cost, NPA trend, deposit franchise.
Main risk check
Low P/B can be a trap if asset quality or credit cost is worsening.
PE
18.7
PB
1.4
EV/EBITDA
ROE
7.1%
ROCE
6.0%
FCF Yield
23.0%
Debt/Equity
0.2
MoS
+31.9%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
42
Previous: 42
Verdict
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
+31.9%
Previous: +31.9%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
49
49
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹21.15
-6.4% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
27.8
Growth-justified Value
₹33.02
+31.9% MoS
PEG
0.47

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
68Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 56th percentile of the scored universe and 70th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 40/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: Altman Z is 1.49.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
112 docs text-extracted · 30 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
56th percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 70th pctile, median 62 · Mid: 32nd pctile, median 76

Evidence depth
Financial-only

112 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
55
watch · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
75
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is 23%.
  • 4 years of positive FCF.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust risks

  • Altman Z is 1.49.
  • ROCE is low at 6%.
  • ROE is low at 7.1%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
18.70
P/B
1.35
EV/EBITDA
Market Cap
70624.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
7.10%
ROCE
5.98%
ROA
0.80%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
9.00%
EPS 5Y
25.00%
Revenue 3Y
10.00%
EPS 3Y
69.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.20
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
1.49
Book Value
16.70

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
23.03%
FCF Positive Y
4/5
OCF
21217.00 Cr
EPS TTM
1.19

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
62%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 3.0-88.0% vs prev
025.0Mar 2017: 5.0Mar 2018: 9.0Mar 2019: 3.0Mar 2020: 10.0Mar 2021: 0.0Mar 2022: 10.0Mar 2023: 3.0Mar 2024: 5.0Mar 2025: 25.0Mar 2026: 3.0FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 3,775+7.5% vs prev
-16k04233Mar 2017: 4,233Mar 2018: 1,709Mar 2019: -16.4kMar 2020: -3,489Mar 2021: 1,064Mar 2022: 736Mar 2023: 1,285Mar 2024: 2,447Mar 2025: 3,512Mar 2026: 3,775FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 7.4+0.5% vs prev
-61.1019.2Mar 2017: 19.2%Mar 2018: 6.6%Mar 2019: -61.1%Mar 2020: -16.1%Mar 2021: 3.2%Mar 2022: 2.2%Mar 2023: 3.2%Mar 2024: 5.8%Mar 2025: 7.3%Mar 2026: 7.4%FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Peers

Business-comparable names in Financial Services, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.