Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Credit Rating 17 Oct - Crisil reaffirmed ratings for ₹1,60,000 crore fixed deposits, ₹8,000 crore Tier II bonds, and ₹45,000 crore CDs.
Source: Bse
Financial Services stocks · Mid cap · NSE
IDFC First Bank is a private sector bank in India, transitioning from a high-yield, high-credit-cost NBFC model to a diversified bank offering prime loans while retaining specialized lending capabilities. It is actively building its deposit franchise, digital capabilities, and expanding its product lines across retail, rural, MSME, and corporate segments.
SMA20 -5.4% / mo · MACD −
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue +14.6% · PAT +153.4% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Rev +15% YoY · PAT +153% YoY · operating leverage
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹11,051 Cr | +14.6% | +4.7% |
| EBITDA | NDF | NDF | NDF |
| Operating margin | NDF | NDF | NDF |
| PAT | ₹1,148 Cr | +153.4% | +246.8% |
| PAT margin | 10.4% | +569 bps | +725 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 20/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 32.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 25 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Banks are balance-sheet businesses, so book value quality matters more than simple earnings multiples.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Q4 FY26 PAT reported at Rs. 319 crores, significantly impacted by a Rs. 480 crores post-tax fraud incident and Rs. 118 crores post-tax treasury loss. Normalized PAT, excluding these and a tax refund, was Rs. 746 crores, up 145% YoY. Loan growth was healthy at 20% YoY, while deposits grew 16.8% YoY but were flat QoQ. Asset quality improved with GNPA at 1.61% and NNPA at 0.48%.
The bank demonstrated strong underlying operational performance in Q4 FY26, with robust loan growth and improving asset quality. However, the significant one-off fraud incident and flat sequential deposit growth raise concerns about short-term stability and the deposit franchise's resilience. Management is confident of a strong recovery in deposit growth and continued operational improvement, but the path to sustained higher ROA remains under scrutiny.
The bank's lending machine operates across 25 lines of businesses, with a book yield of 13%+ and credit costs less than 2%, providing a unique risk-adjusted yield.
MFI book decline has been arrested, with disbursements up 27% QoQ. Management expects the MFI book to grow by 15-20% next year.
Credit cards have crossed 4.5 million, and the book has grown strongly at about 22% on a Y-o-Y basis.
After de-growing the book from ~Rs. 68,000 crores to ~Rs. 36,000 crores to clean out project financing, the corporate book is now on a growth path with no meaningful credit loss.
The bank added about 80 branches in Q4 FY26.
Despite the fraud incident, the bank received significant customer support, with new account openings in March remaining strong, equal to previous months.
Management expects operating leverage to improve into the next year, with the top line growing faster than opex, contributing positively to ROA.
89% of the MFI book is covered through CGFMU, which is expected to provide some benefit to credit cost in the next year.
A fraud incident in Q4 resulted in claims of Rs. 646 crores principal, with a post-tax impact of Rs. 480 crores on PAT.
The bank reported a trading loss of Rs. 159 crores (pre-tax) in Q4 due to widening G-Sec yields.
Tight liquidity, advanced tax outflows, and the West Asia crisis impacted deposit flows during Q4, leading to modest 1% QoQ growth.
Deposit growth was flat QoQ in Q4 due to rate reductions, a fraud incident, and tight liquidity, raising questions about sustained growth momentum.
The ongoing West Asia crisis is being monitored for potential escalation that could lead to material supply disruptions, impacting certain sectors.
Management anticipates needing more capital by the end of the next year or starting the year after to support its growth trajectory.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
YoY comparison is crucial for assessing overall growth trends in loans and deposits, which are typically seasonal. QoQ comparison is vital for evaluating sequential momentum in asset quality metrics, NIM, and the immediate impact of one-off events like the fraud incident and MFI recovery.
Loans and advances, including credit substitutes, grew by 20% on a Y-o-Y basis to Rs. 2.9 lakh crores.
MFI loan disbursements were higher by almost 27% on a sequential basis.
Q4 NIM was 5.93% on an AUM basis. Full year FY26 NIM was 5.75%. Management expects NIM to be stable around 5.75% for the next year.
Cost of funds came down to 6% in Q4, a reduction of over 50 basis points in the last year.
Management claims normalized Q4 PAT was Rs. 746 crores (excluding one-offs), translating to a 145% YoY increase.
Management expects strong traction in deposit growth in Q1 FY27, aiming for a 'normal' 5% QoQ growth rate.
Management estimates the lending business ROA at 1.5-1.6% of loans, with the liability side drag expected to reduce from 1% to 0% in the next few years.
Management believes the bank will not stop at 1% ROA, as operating leverage will continue to improve for the next 4-5 years, leading to further PAT growth.
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| Deposit Growth (QoQ) | Flat in Q4 FY26 | Management's target of 5% QoQ growth in Q1 FY27 and subsequent quarters. |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 5.75% for FY26 | Stability around the 5.75% level in FY27, as guided by management. |
| Credit Cost | 2.13% for FY26 | Reduction to the guided range of 170-180 basis points for FY27. |
| Liability Side Drag (ROA impact) | 1% in FY26 | Continued reduction towards 0% over the next few years, as per management's plan. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 32nd percentile of the scored universe and 49th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 28/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Financial Services: 49th pctile, median 62 · Mid: 15th pctile, median 76
129 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse