Skip to content

RBL Bank Limited (RBLBANK)

Small Cap

Financial Services stocks · Small cap · NSE

RBL Bank is an Indian private sector bank. Emirates NBD Bank (P.J.S.C) recently infused ~USD 2.75 billion, acquiring 60% of the expanded share capital and becoming its promoter. The bank offers a range of retail and wholesale banking products and services.

₹375.75
-2.50 · -0.66%
Market cap ₹58,676 Cr
IndicesNifty 500
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals16 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result12 Oct, 04:39 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Financial Services P/E 17.0 (n=243)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

50Neutral

SMA20 +1.2% / mo · MACD −

Stock trend: 55
Sector RS: 44
Sector 3M: -5.8% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

RBLBANKD candles · FIT view+16.9%
Latest close ₹375.75 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-1.1%
RSI
38
MACD hist
-5.05
52W pos
62%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹380.00H ₹381.00L ₹374.00C ₹375.75Vol 22.5L sh
₹299.93₹333.89₹367.85₹401.81₹435.7852H₹375.752026-032026-062026-09VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

RBLBANKNifty Financial ServicesNifty 500
-10%-0%+9%+19%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026RBLBANK +2.0%Nifty Financial Servi… -6.0%Nifty 500 -5.6%
RBLBANK
+2.0%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Financial Services
-6.0%
Vs Nifty 500
+7.6 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-12.5%
₹429.6
52W range position
63%
₹284.5 - ₹429.6
ATR (14)
3.2%
₹11.9
Volume vs 20D
0.37x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹242 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹373.4 - ₹429.6
44.4% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
26

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Excellent
85

Revenue +54.0% · PAT +159.6% YoY

Technical
Neutral
50

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+0.7%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
71

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Sept 2026

Excellent · 85/100

Rev +54% YoY · PAT +160% YoY · +41% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 12 Oct 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹5,401.7 Cr+54.0%+40.7%
EBITDANDFNDFNDF
Operating marginNDFNDFNDF
PAT₹498.4 Cr+159.6%+113.0%
PAT margin9.2%+376 bps+314 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
48.70
P/B
1.35
EV/EBITDA
—
Market Cap
58676.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
5.43%
ROCE
5.81%
ROA
0.54%
Dividend Y
0.27%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
11.00%
EPS 5Y
11.00%
Revenue 3Y
14.00%
EPS 3Y
-2.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.08
Interest Coverage
—
Altman Z
1.78
Book Value
279.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
12.59%
FCF Positive Y
5/5
OCF
7578.00 Cr
EPS TTM
12.36

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
59.88%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
64%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 3.0-72.7% vs prev
014.0Mar 2017: 10.0Mar 2018: 5.0Mar 2019: 11.0Mar 2020: 3.0Mar 2021: 14.0Mar 2022: 11.0Mar 2023: 10.0Mar 2024: 5.0Mar 2025: 11.0Mar 2026: 3.0FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 879+22.6% vs prev
-166.001260Mar 2017: 447Mar 2018: 633Mar 2019: 861Mar 2020: 500Mar 2021: 529Mar 2022: -166Mar 2023: 920Mar 2024: 1,260Mar 2025: 717Mar 2026: 879FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 5.3+14.8% vs prev
-1.3011.4Mar 2017: 10.3%Mar 2018: 9.5%Mar 2019: 11.4%Mar 2020: 4.7%Mar 2021: 4.2%Mar 2022: -1.3%Mar 2023: 6.8%Mar 2024: 8.5%Mar 2025: 4.6%Mar 2026: 5.3%FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 38. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 rising (~1.2% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 38 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 13% off 52W high · 31% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

82
RS percentile
Stage 2 UptrendEstablished S2
1M return
-9.7%
3M return
+2.0%
6M return
+18.3%
1Y return
+15.6%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
-6
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#9
Stage evidence
  • Price is 3.8% above the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is above the 30-week proxy and its slope is rising +3.6%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are positive.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price above
S2 entered
28 Apr 2026
S2 age
123 trading sessions
Sector
neutral
Industry
neutral
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 142.17+0.37%
95112129146163Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 26142
RS vs Nifty 500142

Valuation & peers

U-Score 26 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

26U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation3/30
Growth7/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet5/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
26

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

26/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 12.6%.
  • Cash flow contributes 8/10 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 5/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.8, in distress territory.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 3/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Bank valuation: P/B adjusted for ROE and asset quality

Banks are balance-sheet businesses, so book value quality matters more than simple earnings multiples.

Bank P/B
Primary lens
Price/book and ROE/ROA, not trailing PE alone.
Secondary checks
Capital adequacy, credit cost, NPA trend, deposit franchise.
Main risk check
Low P/B can be a trap if asset quality or credit cost is worsening.
PE
48.7
PB
1.4
EV/EBITDA
—
ROE
5.4%
ROCE
5.8%
FCF Yield
12.6%
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
+0.7%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
26
Previous: 26
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
+0.7%
Previous: +0.7%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
25
25
25
25
25
25
27
26
26
26
26
26

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹278.55
-34.9% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
30.6
Growth-justified Value
₹378.22
+0.7% MoS
PEG
4.43

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
KARURVYSYA
Small
Karur Vysya Bank Limited
Banking
match 162
50
11.6
19.1%
+53%
FAIR VALUE
CUB
Small
City Union Bank Limited
Banking
match 161
38
16.0
13.2%
+36%
WATCHLIST
IDFCFIRSTB
Mid
IDFC First Bank Limited
Banking
match 160
25
29.6
3.8%
-9%
OVERVALUED
IDBI
Small
IDBI Bank Limited
Banking
match 159
65
9.7
14.1%
+63%
UNDERVALUED
INDUSINDBK
Large
IndusInd Bank Limited
Banking
match 159
10
51.2
1.4%
-2121%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-07-18T07:29:39.458Z
Management commentary snapshot

RBL Bank reported strong Q1 FY27 Net Profit growth of 27% YoY, driven by 31% YoY operating profit growth and 23% YoY advances growth. Capital adequacy significantly improved post ENBD's ~INR 260 billion capital infusion, while asset quality remained stable.

The substantial capital infusion by Emirates NBD has dramatically strengthened RBL Bank's capital position and led to rating upgrades, providing a strong foundation for future growth. While NII and NIM saw a slight QoQ dip, and deposits declined sequentially, overall asset quality improved, and advances growth remained robust YoY. The strategic partnership with ENBD offers significant long-term synergy potential.

Current business mix

Advances by Segment

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.

Businessmix
Retail55.0%
Wholesale45.0%
Growth engines

Wholesale Advances Growth

Wholesale advances grew by 38% YoY to Rs.520.27 bn in Q1 FY27.

Retail Disbursals Momentum

Retail Disbursals for Q1 FY27 were Rs. 74.81 bn, marking a 45% YoY growth.

Core Fee Income Growth

Core Fee Income for Q1 FY27 grew 16% YoY to Rs.9.23 bn.

Tailwinds

Strategic Investor & Capital Infusion

Emirates NBD Bank (P.J.S.C) infused ~USD 2.75 billion, acquiring 60% stake and becoming a promoter, providing a scalable platform in India with cross-border synergies.

Improved Credit Ratings

Issuer Rating upgraded to ICRA AAA (Stable) and CARE AAA (Stable) for various instruments post capital infusion.

Strengthened Capital Position

Capital adequacy ratio & CET-1 significantly increased to 33.3% & 32.2% respectively, post capital infusion.

Headwinds

Net Interest Margin (NIM) Compression

Net Interest Margin (NIM) declined to 4.13% in Q1 FY27 from 4.41% QoQ and 4.50% YoY.

Sequential Deposit Decline

Deposits declined 10% QoQ to Rs. 1,248.29 bn.

Declining CASA Ratio

Average CASA ratio declined to 25.2% in Q1 FY27 from 27.0% QoQ and 28.0% YoY.

Risk radar

Sustaining Deposit Growth

Deposits declined 10% QoQ, indicating a challenge in sequential deposit accretion and CASA ratio improvement.

NIM Pressure

NIM compression observed QoQ and YoY, suggesting potential pressure on profitability if not managed effectively.

Retail Portfolio Quality

Net Slippages increased QoQ to 7.90 bn from 6.24 bn, warranting close monitoring of asset quality trends in retail segments.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Jan 2026
Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is crucial for assessing underlying business growth and asset quality trends, especially for a financial institution. QoQ comparison is also important to track sequential momentum in key metrics like NIM, deposit accretion, and slippages, particularly after a major capital event.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Advances Growth

Advances grew by 23% YoY to Rs.1,162.23 bn. Wholesale advances grew 38% YoY, and Retail advances grew 13% YoY.

Retail Disbursements Growth

Retail Disbursals for Q1 FY27 were Rs. 74.81 bn, growing 45% YoY.

Net Interest Margin (NIM)

NIM was 4.13% for Q1 FY27, down from 4.41% QoQ and 4.50% YoY.

Cost of Funds

Cost of Funds was 6.01% for Q1 FY27, up from 5.87% QoQ but down from 6.55% YoY.

Management forward view

ENBD Branch Amalgamation

The amalgamation of three ENBD branches operating in India into RBL Bank is awaiting final approvals from authorities.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Net Interest Margin (NIM)4.13%Stabilization or improvement in NIM, given the sequential decline.
Deposit Growth11% YoY, -10% QoQReversal of sequential deposit decline and improvement in CASA ratio.
Retail Advances Share55% of total advancesTrend in retail advances growth and its share in the overall portfolio, especially unsecured segments.
Return on Equity (RoE) (excluding capital infusion impact)~5% (excluding capital infusion)Improvement in reported RoE as new capital is deployed efficiently.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Show extracted source claims
operational efficiencynot yet verifiablequantified

The bank will be building up its Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR) to a comfortable range of 75% to 78% in the coming quarter.

Timeframe: Next quarterDirection: IncreaseConfidence: Will be building up

"Maybe in the quarter to come, we will be building up to that extent."

margin outlooknot yet verifiable

The bank expects margins to be marginally better in the next quarter (Q4 FY '26) due to further repricing of term deposits and improved disbursals in better yielding assets.

Timeframe: Next quarter (Q4 FY '26)Direction: BetterConfidence: Expect

"we expect the margins to be marginally better in next quarter"

market share expansionnot yet verifiable

The bank will sustain its branch expansion momentum to strengthen its physical footprint and support growth in retail deposits.

Timeframe: OngoingDirection: Sustain momentum, strengthen, support growthConfidence: Will

"we will sustain this momentum to strengthen our physical footprint and support growth in retail deposits"

operational efficiencynot yet verifiable

Credit card slippages are expected to continue to be slightly elevated for 2 more quarters.

Timeframe: Next 2 quartersDirection: Continue elevatedConfidence: Expect

"we expect this trend to continue for 2 quarters -- 2 more quarters"

Trust Score
71Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 66th percentile of the scored universe and 78th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 28/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 20 Oct 2026
management-trust-v1
114 docs text-extracted · 8 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
66th percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 78th pctile, median 62 · Small: 69th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

114 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

4 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
90
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
62
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
28
weak · capital discipline
Results
82
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 59.9%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸Promoter holding increased 59.9%.
  • ▸FCF yield is 12.6%.

Trust risks

  • ▸Altman Z is 1.78.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 5.8%.
  • ▸ROE is low at 5.4%.
  • ▸Revenue CAGR is 14% but EPS CAGR is -2%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Allotment of ESOP / ESPS 4 Oct - RBL Bank Limited informs the exchange about ESOP allotment.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Credit rating

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Credit Rating 11 Sep - CareEdge assigned BBB+/Stable to USD 350 million notes, reaffirmed USD 1 billion EMTN and issuer ratings.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 19 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 13 Aug - RBL Bank Ltd inform to the exchanges about copy of newspaper publication

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.