IP
IndiaPulse

IDBI Bank Limited (IDBI)

Small Cap

Financial Services stocks · Small cap · NSE

IDBI Bank Limited is an Indian public sector bank providing a range of banking and financial services. The bank focuses on retail and corporate advances, with a growing emphasis on digital banking and financial inclusion initiatives. It aims for sustained profitability and asset quality improvement.

₹90.63
-1.34 · -1.46%
Quote04 Sept, 04:00 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Financial Services P/E 18.5 (n=240)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
63

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
77

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bullish
64

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
stable
67

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 30/100

Rev +7% YoY · PAT +5% YoY

Filed 18 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹7,549 Cr+7.4%-3.3%
EBITDANDFNDFNDF
Operating marginNDFNDFNDF
PAT₹2,131 Cr+5.3%+5.9%
PAT margin28.2%-57 bps+244 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-22T07:42:20.162Z
Management commentary snapshot

IDBI Bank reports strong NII and advances growth in Q4 FY26, but PAT declines YoY; asset quality continues to improve with lower NPAs and high PCR.

While operational metrics like NII, NIM, and advances growth are robust, the YoY decline in PAT raises concerns. This is primarily driven by a significant drop in 'Recovery from W/O cases' within other income, masking underlying improvements. Sustaining profitability requires consistent core income generation beyond one-off recoveries.

Current business mix

Gross Advances by Type (Mar 2026)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.

Businessmix
Retail70.0%
Corporate30.0%
Growth engines

Retail Net Advances Growth

Retail Net Advances grew by 16% YoY to Rs.177295 crore, indicating strong traction in this segment.

Priority Sector Advances

Priority Sector Advances grew by Rs.19449 crore YoY to Rs.99742 crore, reaching 44.15% of ANBC.

Digital Transaction Adoption

97% of customer-induced transactions are routed through digital channels, with UPI as the preferred mode, showing strong digital engagement.

Capacity and execution

Digital Merchant Base Expansion

Merchant Base (BHIM/UPI, AePS, Physical PoS) increased from 4.23 lakh in Mar 2025 to 6.46 lakh in Mar 2026.

UPI Transactional Value Growth

UPI Transactional Value grew from Rs.89812 crore (Jan-Mar 2025) to Rs.102635 crore (Jan-Mar 2026).

Tailwinds

Improving Asset Quality

GNPA reduced by 66 bps YoY and NNPA by 3 bps QoQ, with PCR consistently above 99%.

Strong Capital Position

Total CRAR at 26.65% and Tier 1 Capital at 25.56% provide a robust capital buffer.

Digital Adoption

High percentage of digital transactions and growth in UPI/Mobile Banking users indicate successful digital transformation.

Headwinds

Decline in Profit After Tax (PAT)

PAT decreased by 5% YoY to Rs.1943 crore, despite strong NII growth.

Lower Recovery from Written-Off Cases

Recovery from W/O cases declined by 66% YoY in Q4 FY26, impacting other income.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

For financial services, both YoY and QoQ comparisons are crucial. YoY provides insight into long-term growth trends and seasonal impacts, while QoQ highlights sequential momentum in key metrics like spreads, asset quality, and disbursements, which are vital for assessing immediate operational performance.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Net Advances

Net Advances stood at Rs.253626 crore, growing by 16% YoY and 6% QoQ.

Total Deposits

Total Deposits reached Rs.347163 crore, growing by 12% YoY.

Net Interest Income (NII)

NII grew by 17% YoY and 20% QoQ to Rs.3851 crore.

Net Interest Margin (NIM)

NIM was 4.15%, increasing by 15 bps YoY and 63 bps QoQ. Core NIM stood at 3.34%.

Management forward view

Business Growth Target

Management aims to achieve business growth of 12% to 13%.

Profitability & Efficiency Targets

Management targets RoA above 1.50%, RoE above 15%, NIM above 3%, CASA ratio above 42%, and cost to income ratio below 50%.

Asset Quality Targets

Management aims to bring GNPA below 3%, maintain Net NPA below 0.50%, PCR above 90%, and credit cost/net slippages below 0.40%/1.00% respectively.

Strategic Focus

Management plans tie-ups with Fintechs for personal and education loan sourcing and a technology-driven approach for operational excellence.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
PAT Growth (YoY)-5%Reversal of YoY decline and sustained growth, indicating improved core profitability.
Recovery from W/O casesRs.371 crore (Q4 FY26), -66% YoYStabilization or improvement in recoveries to support other income and overall profitability.
Net Interest Margin (NIM)4.15% (Q4 FY26)Maintenance of NIM above 3% and further expansion, especially core NIM, to drive NII growth.
GNPA Ratio2.32% (Q4 FY26)Continued reduction towards the management target of below 3%.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

64Bullish

SMA20 +1.9% / mo · MACD +

Stock trend: 64
Sector RS:

Technical chart

IDBIdaily · 1Y · AUTO-17.8%
Latest close ₹90.63 on 2026-09-04
Bar
-1.9%
RSI
60
MACD hist
0.49
52W pos
52%
2026-09-04O ₹92.40H ₹92.40L ₹90.42C ₹90.63Vol 50.1L sh
₹58.45₹72.55₹86.66₹100.76₹114.8652L90.632026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 60. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 rising (~1.9% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 60 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 23% off 52W high · 49% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

49
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
+7.6%
3M return
+20.2%
6M return
-8.3%
1Y return
-2.9%
RS 1D
-2
RS 20D
+14
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#10
Stage evidence
  • Price is 8.3% above the 30-week proxy without full trend alignment.
  • The 30-week proxy changed -2.3% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
Sector
neutral
Industry
neutral
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 99.52-1.46%
7488102117131Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 26100
RS vs Nifty 500100

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 63 · UNDERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

63U-SCORE
UNDERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation21/30
Growth16/25
Quality6/20
Balance Sheet9/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
63

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

63/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 18.7%.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 62.3%.
  • Cash flow contributes 8/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 6/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 9/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 16/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Bank valuation: P/B adjusted for ROE and asset quality

Banks are balance-sheet businesses, so book value quality matters more than simple earnings multiples.

Bank P/B
Primary lens
Price/book and ROE/ROA, not trailing PE alone.
Secondary checks
Capital adequacy, credit cost, NPA trend, deposit franchise.
Main risk check
Low P/B can be a trap if asset quality or credit cost is worsening.
PE
10.5
PB
1.4
EV/EBITDA
ROE
14.1%
ROCE
5.9%
FCF Yield
18.7%
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
+62.3%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
63
Previous: 63
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+62.3%
Previous: +62.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -3 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
68
68
67
67
67
66
64
64
64
66
66
63

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹111.56
+18.8% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
27.8
Growth-justified Value
₹240.59
+62.3% MoS
PEG
0.26

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
77Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 83rd percentile of the scored universe and 90th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 56/100.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 94.7%. Key concern: ROCE is low at 5.9%.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
62 docs text-extracted · 10 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
83rd percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 90th pctile, median 62 · Small: 86th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

62 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
80
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
56
watch · capital discipline
Results
67
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 94.7%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is 18.7%.
  • 5 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ROCE is low at 5.9%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
10.50
P/B
1.42
EV/EBITDA
Market Cap
97449.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
14.10%
ROCE
5.92%
ROA
2.00%
Dividend Y
2.32%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
8.00%
EPS 5Y
43.00%
Revenue 3Y
12.00%
EPS 3Y
35.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.08
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
1.85
Book Value
63.80

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
18.68%
FCF Positive Y
5/5
OCF
16762.00 Cr
EPS TTM
8.67

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
94.72%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
52%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Financial Services, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.