IP
IndiaPulse

IndusInd Bank Limited (INDUSINDBK)

Large Cap

Financial Services stocks · Large cap · NSE

IndusInd Bank is India's 5th largest private bank, offering universal banking services. It serves 42M customers via 9,413 touch points, with a 3.26T loan book and 4.14T deposits. The bank maintains strong asset quality (GNPA 3.25%, NNPA 0.95%) and capital adequacy (CRAR 17.15%).

₹1,008.5
+3.70 · +0.37%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Financial Services P/E 18.5 (n=240)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Verify management risk first
Do not let cheap valuation override weak Trust or governance evidence.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
9

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Weak Trust
45

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
54

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
15

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 25/100

Rev -8% YoY · PAT +72% YoY · operating leverage

Filed 22 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹11,310 Cr-7.8%+2.8%
EBITDANDFNDFNDF
Operating marginNDFNDFNDF
PAT₹1,037 Cr+71.7%+74.6%
PAT margin9.2%+425 bps+377 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-07-23T07:12:05.112Z
Management commentary snapshot

IndusInd Bank reported Q1FY27 net profit of 1,037crs, up 72% YoY and 75% QoQ, driven by 21% QoQ operating profit growth. Asset quality improved with GNPA at 3.25% and NNPA at 0.95%. NIM (ex-one-offs) was 3.35%, down YoY and QoQ. Loan book grew 3% QoQ, led by wholesale.

Strong net profit growth and improving asset quality are positive. However, the decline in retail & SME loans QoQ and the YoY decline in overall loans warrant close monitoring. NIM compression is also a concern. The stated pivot to growth needs to show broad-based loan expansion.

Current business mix

Loan Book Composition by Segment (End of Period)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 3 reported categories.

Businessmix
Retail50.0%
SME13.0%
Wholesale37.0%
Growth engines

Retailisation of Deposits

Average Retail Deposits increased 4% QoQ, with Retail Deposit share reaching 49.5% vs 47.9% QoQ, driven by 'One Bank' approach, digital enablers, and rural/semi-urban distribution.

Wholesale Banking Growth

Average Wholesale Loans increased 7% QoQ, supported by focus on risk-adjusted returns, primary banker relationships with corporates, and deep domain presence.

Digital Banking Adoption

Monthly Active Users on INDIE app exceeded 2.6Mn+, with 1.5Mn+ UPI transactions. INDIE for Business app has 390K+ MAU, facilitating significant digital acquisitions.

AI Integration

12,000+ employees trained in AI; AI platforms support 15,000+ monthly users. 50+ ML models evaluate ~0.5mn loans monthly and monitor ~42mn customers.

Tailwinds

Moderation in Stress Pools

The bank observed continued moderation in stress pools with lower slippages in Q1FY27.

Improving Cost of Funds

Cost of Deposits decreased by 12bps QoQ and 49bps YoY to 5.95%. Cost of Funds decreased by 9bps QoQ and 64bps YoY to 5.05%.

Digital Adoption & Efficiency

Strong digital adoption with 2.6Mn+ MAU on INDIE app and 390K+ on INDIE for Business, enhancing customer engagement and operational efficiency.

Headwinds

Decline in Retail & SME Loans

Average Retail & SME Loans decreased 1% QoQ, indicating a slowdown in these key growth segments.

Overall Loan Book Contraction YoY

The overall loan book decreased by 2% YoY, despite a 3% QoQ growth, suggesting a longer-term challenge in loan expansion.

NIM Compression

Net Interest Margins (excluding one-offs) declined to 3.35% from 3.39% QoQ and 3.46% YoY.

Decline in Other Income

Total Other Income decreased by 17% YoY to 1,787crs, impacting overall revenue growth.

Risk radar

Asset Quality in Micro Loans

Micro Loan book saw (43)% YoY and (13)% QoQ decline in disbursements, with significant write-offs and gross slippages in Q1FY27.

Wholesale Loan Concentration

Wholesale banking constitutes 37% of the loan book, with NBFCs, Real Estate, and Power sectors being notable exposures, requiring careful monitoring.

SME Loan Book Decline

SME loan book decreased (5)% YoY and (2)% QoQ, indicating potential stress or reduced demand in this segment.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

Financial services performance is influenced by both seasonal factors (e.g., loan demand, festival season impact) and sequential momentum (e.g., asset quality trends, interest rate changes, disbursement pace). Therefore, both YoY and QoQ comparisons are crucial for a comprehensive understanding.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

AUM Growth (Loans)

Loans at 3,26,274crs, (2)% YoY and 3% QoQ. Average total loans increased 3% QoQ, while average Retail & SME loans decreased 1% QoQ.

Disbursements

Vehicle Finance disbursements were 10,832crs, down (14)% YoY and (4)% QoQ. Micro Loan disbursements were 5,226crs, down (43)% YoY and (13)% QoQ.

Net Interest Margin (NIM)

Net Interest Margins (excluding one-offs) stood at 3.35% in Q1FY27, compared to 3.46% YoY and 3.39% QoQ.

Borrowing Cost

Cost of Deposits was 5.95% in Q1FY27, down 12bps QoQ and 49bps YoY. Cost of Funds was 5.05%, down 9bps QoQ and 64bps YoY.

Management forward view

Growth Pivot

Management states a 'pivot towards growth from consolidation' as a key highlight for Q1FY27.

AI-Powered Banking

Focus on building an AI-powered bank, with 12,000+ employees trained and AI platforms supporting loan evaluation and customer monitoring.

Retail Deposit Focus

Continued emphasis on building a granular and cost-efficient liabilities franchise through process enhancement, differentiated products, and digital enablers.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Overall Loan Growth(2)% YoY, 3% QoQSustained broad-based loan growth, particularly in Retail and SME segments.
Net Interest Margin (NIM)3.35% (ex-one-offs)Stabilization and improvement in NIM, indicating better asset yield or lower funding costs.
Asset Quality TrendsGNPA 3.25%, NNPA 0.95%Continued moderation in stress pools and slippages across all segments, especially Micro Loans.
Retail & SME Loan GrowthAvg Retail & SME Loans 1% QoQReversal of the QoQ decline and positive growth in these strategically important segments.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

54Neutral

MACD −

Stock trend: 54
Sector RS:

Technical chart

INDUSINDBKdaily · 1Y · AUTO+7.6%
Latest close ₹1008.50 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.4%
RSI
51
MACD hist
-2.12
52W pos
81%
2026-09-04O ₹1004.80H ₹1008.60L ₹998.00C ₹1008.50Vol 13.2L sh
₹734.13₹824.15₹914.17₹1.00k₹1.09k52H1008.502026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Neutral

Trend is undirectional — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 51.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 roughly flat — short-term momentum stalled.
  • RSI(14) at 51 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 6% off 52W high · 42% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

81
RS percentile
Stage 2 Uptrend
1M return
-1.3%
3M return
+9.3%
6M return
+21.3%
1Y return
+35.9%
RS 1D
+2
RS 20D
+4
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#10
Stage evidence
  • Price is 8.9% above the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is above the 30-week proxy and its slope is rising +1.4%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are positive.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
Sector
neutral
Industry
neutral
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 124.99+0.36%
88100112124135Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 26125
RS vs Nifty 500125

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 9 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

9U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation1/30
Growth3/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet0/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
4/9 (+1)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
9

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

9/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 3/25 to the score.
  • Valuation contributes 1/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.6, in distress territory.
  • Promoter pledge is 42.8%.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -2495.2%.
Sector valuation model

Bank valuation: P/B adjusted for ROE and asset quality

Banks are balance-sheet businesses, so book value quality matters more than simple earnings multiples.

Bank P/B
Primary lens
Price/book and ROE/ROA, not trailing PE alone.
Secondary checks
Capital adequacy, credit cost, NPA trend, deposit franchise.
Main risk check
Low P/B can be a trap if asset quality or credit cost is worsening.
PE
59.4
PB
1.2
EV/EBITDA
ROE
1.4%
ROCE
5.7%
FCF Yield
0.6%
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
-2495.2%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
9
Previous: 9
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-2495.2%
Previous: -2495.2%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
10
11
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹567.68
-77.7% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
2.3
Growth-justified Value
₹38.86
-2495.2% MoS
PEG

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
45Weak Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Weak Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 2nd percentile of the scored universe and 2nd percentile within Financial Services. Main check: results consistency is weak at 15/100.

Mixed Trust Lite: FCF yield is positive at 0.6%. Key concern: Promoters have pledged 42.8% of holding.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
155 docs text-extracted · 28 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Weak Trust

Management or financial behaviour needs caution. Demand stronger valuation compensation.

Relative rank
2nd percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 2nd pctile, median 62 · Large: 1st pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

155 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Weak Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
23
weak · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
55
watch · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
15
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • FCF yield is positive at 0.6%.
  • 5 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • Promoters have pledged 42.8% of holding.
  • Altman Z is 1.63.
  • 3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • Promoter holding is only 15.8%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
59.40
P/B
1.19
EV/EBITDA
Market Cap
78576.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
1.36%
ROCE
5.68%
ROA
0.24%
Dividend Y
0.15%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
10.00%
EPS 5Y
-21.00%
Revenue 3Y
8.00%
EPS 3Y
-51.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.11
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
1.63
Book Value
844.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.60%
FCF Positive Y
5/5
OCF
993.00 Cr
EPS TTM
16.97

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
15.82%
Promoter Pledge
42.80%
Momentum 52W
81%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Financial Services, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.