Skip to content

Tara Chand InfraLogistic Solutions Limited (TARACHAND)

Small Cap

Infra stocks · Small cap · NSE

Tara Chand InfraLogistic Solutions Limited operates in Infrastructure EPC, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹47.08
+1.02 · +2.21%
Market cap ₹366 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 01:48 am IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Infra P/E 15.4 (n=87)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

38Bearish

SMA20 -2.3% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector -2.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 40
Sector RS: 35
Sector 3M: -8.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but the sector index is below its 100-session average. View sector evidence

Technical chart

TARACHANDD candles · FIT view-27.9%
Latest close ₹47.08 on 2026-10-21
Bar
-1.9%
RSI
51
MACD hist
0.17
52W pos
4%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹47.99H ₹48.75L ₹46.21C ₹47.08Vol 89,919 sh
₹43.75₹50.63₹57.50₹64.38₹71.2552L₹47.082026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

TARACHANDNifty InfraNifty 500
-22%-12%-3%+7%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026TARACHAND -16.6%Nifty 500 -6.5%
TARACHAND
-16.6%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Infra
-8.3%
Vs Nifty 500
-10.1 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-54.6%
₹103.7
52W range position
4%
₹45 - ₹103.7
ATR (14)
3.6%
₹1.7
Volume vs 20D
2.02x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.2 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹45 - ₹49
31.4% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Investable fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · UNDERVALUED
61

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -17.1% · PAT -79.0% YoY

Technical
Bearish
38

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+42.4%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
69

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -17% YoY · PAT -79% YoY · margin compression

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹67.6 Cr-17.1%-24.5%
EBITDA₹20.2 Cr-10.0%-35.0%
Operating margin29.9%-689 bps-485 bps
PAT₹1.7 Cr-79.0%-80.6%
PAT margin2.5%-811 bps-710 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
16.90
P/B
2.46
EV/EBITDA
3.09
Market Cap
366.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
19.40%
ROCE
17.80%
ROA
5.43%
Dividend Y
0.43%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
42.00%
EPS 5Y
42.00%
Revenue 3Y
26.00%
EPS 3Y
26.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.93
Interest Coverage
9.45×
Altman Z
2.28
Book Value
18.90

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
0/5
OCF
69.00 Cr
EPS TTM
3.54

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
71.64%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
2%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 285+14.9% vs prev
0285.0Mar 2025: 248Mar 2026: 285FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 28.0+12.0% vs prev
028.0Mar 2025: 25.0Mar 2026: 28.0FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 18.8-8.3% vs prev
020.5Mar 2025: 20.5%Mar 2026: 18.8%FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 51. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 falling (~2.4% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 51 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

10
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-0.3%
3M return
-16.6%
6M return
-27.8%
1Y return
-49.3%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
-3
Sector rank
#17
Industry rank
#68
Stage evidence
  • Price is 13.6% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.1%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 71.3+3.17%
6381100119137Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2671
RS vs Nifty 50071

Valuation & peers

U-Score 61 · legacy U-Score band UNDERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

61U-SCORE
Growth at Value

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · UNDERVALUED
Valuation18/30
Growth20/25
Quality12/20
Balance Sheet7/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-2
Raw sum
61

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

61/100 · legacy band UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 42.4%.
  • Growth contributes 20/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 2 points.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 1/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 7/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
16.9
PB
2.5
EV/EBITDA
3.1
ROE
19.4%
ROCE
17.8%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.9
MoS
+42.4%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
61
Previous: 61
Legacy U-Score band
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+42.4%
Previous: +43.7%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
58
58
58
61
61

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹38.8
-21.3% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
23.1
Growth-justified Value
₹81.77
+42.4% MoS
PEG
0.47

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Infra — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
PNCINFRA
Micro
PNC Infratech Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 85
45
6.1
2.4%
-110%
WATCHLIST
AFCONS
Small
Afcons Infrastructure Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 80
18
44.0
5.6%
-124%
OVERVALUED
POWERMECH
Micro
Power Mech Projects Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 78
55
19.8
15.4%
+18%
FAIR VALUE
RITES
Large
RITES Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 76
41
23.1
15.4%
-245%
WATCHLIST
IRCON
Small
Ircon International Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 76
17
19.2
8.2%
-33%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Tara Chand InfraLogistic Solutions Limited operates in Infrastructure EPC, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
69Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 59th percentile of the scored universe and 65th percentile within Infra. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 43/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
28 docs text-extracted · 13 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
59th percentile

overall median 67 · Infra: 65th pctile, median 64 · Small: 63rd pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

28 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
43
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
73
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
76
strong · capital discipline
Results
72
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 71.6%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • ▸3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸Only 0 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

8 shown
Annual reportJun 2026

Jun 2026 · Copy of Newspaper Publication 24 June 2026 - Newspaper advertisement issued for 14th AGM on July 16, 2026; annual report, book closure and e-voting details shared.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2026

Jun 2026 · General Updates 23 June 2026 - 14th AGM on 16 July 2026; annual report link shared, KYC and demat reminder issued.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2026

Jun 2026 · Appointment 11 June 2026 - Board approved annual report, director and auditor reappointments, AGM on July 16, 2026, record date July 9, 2026.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2026

Jun 2026 · Shareholders meeting 22 June 2026 - 14th AGM on 16 July 2026; FY26 annual report issued, ₹0.20 final dividend proposed.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationOct 2024

Oct 2024 · PPT

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Concall transcriptOct 2024

Oct 2024 · Transcript

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.