Skip to content

The Ramco Cements Limited (RAMCOCEM)

Small Cap

Materials stocks · Small cap · NSE

The Ramco Cements Limited is an Indian cement manufacturer. The company reported its 3QFY26/9MFY26 performance, highlighting growth in construction chemicals and premium products, alongside challenges from increased raw material costs and sequential price drops.

₹779
-8.35 · -1.06%
Market cap ₹19,071 Cr
IndicesNifty 500
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 02:32 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 02:32 pm IST
Base fundamentals16 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 01:49 am IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Materials P/E 28.8 (n=19)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

20Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -5.1% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -3.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 24
Sector 3M: -9.9% vs Nifty 500 -6.2%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

RAMCOCEMD candles · FIT view-18.6%TODAY · PROVISIONAL
Latest price ₹779.00 on 2026-10-21

Today's candle is provisional from the latest intraday quote; completed-candle scans remain unchanged.

Bar
-2.1%
RSI
30
MACD hist
-3.50
52W pos
1%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹795.60H ₹798.15L ₹774.90C ₹779.00Vol 1.9L shIntraday candle
₹763.38₹826.73₹890.08₹953.43₹1.02k52L₹779.002026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

RAMCOCEMNifty CommoditiesNifty 500
-17%-10%-2%+5%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026RAMCOCEM -15.0%Nifty Commodities -9.0%Nifty 500 -5.6%
RAMCOCEM
-15.0%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Commodities
-9.0%
Vs Nifty 500
-9.4 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-35.2%
₹1,214.5
52W range position
2%
₹779.5 - ₹1,214.5
ATR (14)
2.8%
₹22
Volume vs 20D
0.51x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹14.5 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹779.5 - ₹898
22.9% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
26

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue +9.6% · PAT -63.5% YoY

Technical
Bearish
20

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-3258.8%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
73

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -64% YoY · margin compression · Rev +10% YoY

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹2,273 Cr+9.6%-12.9%
EBITDA₹306 Cr-23.1%-17.5%
Operating margin13.0%-600 bps-100 bps
PAT₹31 Cr-63.5%-79.5%
PAT margin1.4%-274 bps-443 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
100.00
P/B
2.35
EV/EBITDA
10.97
Market Cap
19071.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
0.38%
ROCE
6.13%
ROA
3.88%
Dividend Y
0.32%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
11.00%
EPS 5Y
-48.00%
Revenue 3Y
3.00%
EPS 3Y
-54.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.48
Interest Coverage
3.28×
Altman Z
3.02
Book Value
343.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
6.68%
FCF Positive Y
7/5
OCF
1611.00 Cr
EPS TTM
27.29

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
42.55%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
6%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 2,273-12.9% vs prev
02678Sep 2023: 2,341Dec 2023: 2,111Mar 2024: 2,678Jun 2024: 2,094Sep 2024: 2,044Dec 2024: 1,983Mar 2025: 2,397Jun 2025: 2,074Sep 2025: 2,239Dec 2025: 2,106Mar 2026: 2,610Jun 2026: 2,273Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 31.0-79.5% vs prev
0386.0Sep 2023: 72.0Dec 2023: 82.0Mar 2024: 129Jun 2024: 37.0Sep 2024: 26.0Dec 2024: 182Mar 2025: 26.0Jun 2025: 85.0Sep 2025: 78.0Dec 2025: 386Mar 2026: 151Jun 2026: 31.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 30. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~6.0% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 30 — oversold zone; bounce conditions.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

18
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-9.5%
3M return
-15.0%
6M return
-20.6%
1Y return
-25.7%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
-9
Sector rank
#18
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is 13.1% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.2%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
261 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 81.48-1.22%
798998108118Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2681
RS vs Nifty 50081

Valuation & peers

U-Score 26 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

26U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation1/30
Growth5/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet5/15
Cash Flow9/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
26

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

26/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 6.7%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Cash flow contributes 9/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -3258.8%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 1/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
100.0
PB
2.4
EV/EBITDA
11.0
ROE
0.4%
ROCE
6.1%
FCF Yield
6.7%
Debt/Equity
0.5
MoS
-3258.8%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
26
Previous: 26
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-3258.8%
Previous: -3294.1%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹458.92
-69.7% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
0.8
Growth-justified Value
₹23.2
-3258.8% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Materials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
STARCEMENT
Micro
Star Cement Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 95
56
18.3
13.2%
+41%
FAIR VALUE
ORIENTCEM
Micro
Orient Cement Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 91
78
10.8
17.3%
+64%
DEEP VALUE
SHREECEM
Large
SHREE CEMENT LIMITED
Construction & Engineering
match 86
27
49.4
7.5%
-926%
OVERVALUED
AFCONS
Small
Afcons Infrastructure Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 82
18
44.0
5.6%
-124%
OVERVALUED
IRCON
Small
Ircon International Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 79
17
19.2
8.2%
-33%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-16T16:24:03.021Z
Management commentary snapshot

3QFY26 Revenue up 7% YoY, PAT up 19% YoY, but EBITDA/ton declined 25% QoQ due to new mineral tax and higher fuel costs. Construction chemicals volume grew 79% YoY.

Profitability is under pressure from new taxes and higher fuel costs, leading to a sharp sequential decline in EBITDA/ton. While capacity expansion is underway and non-core asset sales are on track, sustained price drops and competitive intensity pose risks to margin recovery.

Current business mix

Standalone Revenue by Product (3QFY26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 3 reported categories.

Businessmix
Cement95.0%
Construction Chemicals4.2%
Other Income0.8%
Growth engines

Construction Chemicals Business

Volume grew 79% YoY in 3QFY26 and 77% YoY in 9MFY26, with increased brand promotion spend.

Premium Products Share

Share of premium products in the East market increased to 29% in 3QFY26 from 26% in 3QFY25.

Capacity Expansion

Company plans to achieve ~31 MTPA cement capacity by Mar-27 through debottlenecking and brownfield expansion.

Capacity and execution

Ariyalur Debottlenecking

2.00 MTPA cement capacity expected by Feb-26.

Ramasamy Raja Nagar Debottlenecking

0.62 MTPA clinker and 1.00 MTPA cement capacity expected by Mar-26.

Jayanthipuram Debottlenecking

1.01 MTPA clinker and 0.70 MTPA cement capacity expected by Jun-26.

Kolimigundla Line II Brownfield Expansion

3.15 MTPA clinker, 3.00 MTPA cement, and 15 MW WHRS expected before Mar-27.

Tailwinds

Strong GDP Growth Projection

India's real GDP growth for FY27 projected at 6.8% to 7.2%, bolstering rural incomes and urban demand.

Government Capex Focus

FY27 Budget allocation for capex is `12.2 lac crores, up ~9%, with key focus on infrastructure.

Green Power Adoption

47% of total power in 3QFY26 met from green power, driven by record high wind power generation, reducing power cost.

City Economic Regions (CER) Scheme

Budget focus on Tier II and Tier III cities and temple towns through CER expects to drive sustained cement demand.

Headwinds

Cement Price Drop

Trade prices dropped by 8% in East and 9% in South from exit price of Sep-25.

Increased Raw Material Tax

Levy of mineral bearing land tax at `160 per ton of limestone in TN, impacting raw material cost by ~`47 Crores in 3QFY26.

Higher Fuel Costs

Power and fuel cost up by `27/Ton YoY and `59/Ton QoQ due to increase in fuel price and 4% rupee depreciation.

Risk radar

Cement Price Sustainability

Sustainability of cement prices amid rising pace of capacity additions/consolidation and regional competitive intensity.

Input Cost Volatility

INR-USD movement and energy commodity price movements remain sensitive for input cost and margins.

Geopolitical & Weather Risks

Geopolitical tensions, global trade tariff issues, and weather-related uncertainties pose downside risks to demand and costs.

Infrastructure Spending Delays

Execution delays in government-led infrastructure spending.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is crucial for assessing annual growth and seasonal trends in the cement business. QoQ comparison is vital for tracking sequential momentum, price changes, cost fluctuations, and the immediate impact of operational factors.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Cement Sales Volume

3QFY26 sales volume was 44.33 Lac Tons, up 3.6% YoY and 0.75% QoQ.

Cement Capacity Utilization

3QFY26 utilization was 73%, down from 75% in 3QFY25 but up from 71% in 2QFY26.

EBITDA per Ton

3QFY26 EBITDA per ton was `651, down 2.2% YoY and 24.8% QoQ.

Raw Material Cost per Ton

3QFY26 raw material cost per ton was `1,012, up 4.4% YoY and 1.7% QoQ, impacted by `160/ton mineral bearing land tax in TN.

Management forward view

Capacity Target

Company plans to achieve cement capacity of ~31 MTPA by Mar-27.

Capex Reduction

FY26 capex estimated at `1,100 Crores, a reduction of `100 Crores from earlier estimate.

Non-Core Asset Monetization

Monetized `1,017 Crores from non-core assets against a `1,000 Crores target, with plans to dispose ~`200 Crores more soon.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
EBITDA per Ton`651/T (3QFY26)Recovery from sequential decline and sustained impact of new mineral tax.
Cement Trade Prices8-9% drop from Sep-25 exit pricesStabilization or recovery in regional trade prices.
Capacity Utilization73% (3QFY26)Ramp-up and efficient utilization of new and debottlenecked capacities.
Net Debt Reduction2.84x Net Debt/EBITDA (Dec-25)Further reduction through asset monetization and cash generation.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Trust Score
73Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 72nd percentile of the scored universe and 68th percentile within Materials. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 40/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 21 Oct 2026
management-trust-v1
71 docs text-extracted · 16 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
72nd percentile

overall median 67 · Materials: 68th pctile, median 70 · Small: 75th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

71 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
81
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
72
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 6.7%.
  • ▸7 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸ROCE is low at 6.1%.
  • ▸ROE is low at 0.4%.
  • ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

7 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 21 Sep - Copy of notice to shareholders published in Newspapers is attached.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Press Release / Media Release 19 Sep - Hard Worker won three Kyoorius Design Awards 2026 and crossed ₹350 crore sales in 12 months.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Press Release / Media Release 10 Sep - Pandalgudi mine restoration gets Advanced Certification from The Global Biodiversity Standard, first in Peninsular India.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 31 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 28 Aug - Copy of notice to shareholders published in newspapers is attached

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.