Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 4 Sep - Announcement under Reg 30 of SEBI (LODR) Reg 2015 - Newspaper Publication
Source: Bse
Materials stocks · Micro cap · NSE
Star Cement Limited is a leading Eastern India-focused cement company with 9.7 MTPA grinding capacity and 6.1 MTPA clinker capacity. It holds ~27% market share in the North-East, supported by an extensive distribution network and a disciplined expansion strategy. The company aims to transform into a PAN India player.
full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -6.8% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -3.8pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Today's candle is provisional from the latest intraday quote; completed-candle scans remain unchanged.
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue +3.4% · PAT -24.5% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
PAT -24% YoY · margin compression · Rev +3% YoY
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹943 Cr | +3.4% | -19.7% |
| EBITDA | ₹194 Cr | -14.9% | -38.4% |
| Operating margin | 21.0% | -400 bps | -600 bps |
| PAT | ₹74 Cr | -24.5% | -49.7% |
| PAT margin | 7.8% | -290 bps | -467 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 19/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 28. Wait for confirmation.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 56 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Materials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Star Cement reported strong Q4 FY26 performance with 13% YoY sales volume growth and 19% YoY EBITDA growth, reaching highest ever quarterly EBITDA of INR 318 Cr. FY26 annual EBITDA hit a record INR 944 Cr., up 60% YoY, driven by Cachar GU commissioning and robust demand.
The company delivered robust Q4 and full-year FY26 results, driven by strong volume growth and operational efficiencies, including new capacity commissioning. Management's aggressive expansion plans outside the North-East, funded by internal accruals and debt, indicate a clear growth trajectory, though execution and market demand remain key monitoring points.
Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.
Company is transforming from a strong NE leader to a PAN India player with planned expansions in East (Bihar) and North (Nimbol, Haryana).
Cachar Grinding Unit (2.0 MTPA) was commissioned on February 19, 2026, contributing to high Q4 demand fulfillment.
Premium sales were 15.1% of trade sales in Q4 FY26, up from 12.2% in Q4 FY25, indicating potential for higher realizations.
Increased green energy share (33.8% in Q4 FY26) and WHRS contribution (27.4%) are driving cost rationalization.
2.0 MTPA cement capacity commissioned on February 19, 2026.
Planned 2.0 MTPA cement capacity, targeted for commissioning by FY28. Land acquisition is in progress.
Planned 3.3 MTPA clinker and 3.0 MTPA cement capacity, targeted for commissioning by FY29. Land acquisition in progress.
Planned 2.0 MTPA cement capacity, targeted for commissioning by FY29. Land acquisition in progress.
Q4 FY26 sales volume grew 13% YoY, with ROE sales growing by 32%, indicating strong demand outside the core NE market.
Logistics costs decreased QoQ due to fewer disruptions. Low fuel costs were attributable to high coal sourcing from FSA.
Disbursement from Assam Government towards Sonapur Line 2 refund has started.
Escalation in the West Asia crisis largely led to increased costs for packing bags and diesel.
Route restrictions by railways in NFR impacted rake availability, leading to fuel cost escalations and coal availability issues.
Management anticipates fuel costs may rise in Q1 FY27 due to impacted coal availability.
Planned CAPEX for FY27 is estimated at ~INR 700 Cr., with total project outlay of INR 3,650 Cr. for new units, requiring timely execution.
Future expansion is planned through internal accruals and debt financing, targeting Net debt/EBITDA below 1.5x, which needs careful management.
Planned expansion in NE will be evaluated in line with evolving market demand and business conditions.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
YoY comparison is crucial for assessing overall business health and annual trends, especially for a seasonal business. QoQ comparison is important to track sequential momentum, utilization ramp-up from new capacities, and immediate cost impacts.
Q4 FY26 sales volume grew 13% YoY to 17.33 Lacs tons. FY26 sales volume grew to 54.96 Lacs tons from 47.31 Lacs tons in FY25.
Q4 FY26 revenue from cement and clinker sales increased 11% YoY to INR 1,174 Cr. FY26 revenue grew to INR 3,776 Cr. from INR 3,163 Cr. in FY25.
Q4 FY26 EBITDA increased 19% YoY to INR 318 Cr., highest ever for a 4th quarter. FY26 EBITDA was INR 944 Cr., up 60% YoY from INR 589 Cr. in FY25.
Q4 FY26 EBITDA per ton was INR 1,838, up 5.2% YoY from INR 1,748. FY26 EBITDA per ton was INR 1,717, up from INR 1,245 in FY25.
Management targets a green energy share of 60% by FY28, evaluating various renewable energy combinations.
Management achieved the 20% TSR target by FY27 and plans to maintain it going forward.
Management aims for 2x water positive by FY28, currently at 1.60x with new reservoir construction.
Management targets to maintain fiscal prudence and remain below Net debt/EBITDA of 1.5x while funding expansion.
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| Sales Volume Growth | 13% YoY in Q4 FY26 | Sustained growth, especially from new regions (ROE), and utilization ramp-up of Cachar GU. |
| EBITDA per ton | INR 1,838 in Q4 FY26 | Maintenance or improvement, given potential fuel cost increases and benefits from green energy initiatives. |
| Green Energy Share | 33.8% in Q4 FY26 | Progress towards the 60% target by FY28, indicating cost efficiency and sustainability efforts. |
| Net Debt/EBITDA | Not explicitly stated, but target below 1.5x | Adherence to the target of below 1.5x, especially with significant planned CAPEX. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 86th percentile of the scored universe and 95th percentile within Materials. No major sub-score weakness stands out.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Materials: 95th pctile, median 70 · Micro: 74th pctile, median 73
106 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse