Skip to content

UMIYA BUILDCON LIMITED (UMIYA-MRO)

Small Cap

Real Estate stocks · Small cap · NSE

UMIYA BUILDCON LIMITED operates in the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹91.01
-1.42 · -1.54%
Market cap ₹173 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 04:45 am IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 04:45 am IST
Base fundamentals18 Oct 2026 · screener
Official result overlay30 Sept 2026 · nse-xbrl
Latest result12 Oct, 05:48 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Real Estate P/E 22.2 (n=72)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

47Neutral

SMA20 -2.0% / mo · MACD − · sector -6.4pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 49
Sector RS: 44
Sector 3M: -12.0% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest FPI flow is positive, but a second consecutive positive fortnight is still required. View sector evidence

Technical chart

UMIYA-MROD candles · FIT view+6.1%
Latest close ₹91.01 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-0.0%
RSI
41
MACD hist
-0.31
52W pos
54%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹91.05H ₹93.98L ₹90.10C ₹91.01Vol 12,386 sh
₹78.34₹86.37₹94.40₹102.43₹110.4652H₹91.012026-032026-062026-09VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

UMIYA-MRONifty RealtyNifty 500
-16%-4%+8%+20%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026UMIYA-MRO +1.5%Nifty Realty -11.0%Nifty 500 -5.6%
UMIYA-MRO
+1.5%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Realty
-11.0%
Vs Nifty 500
+7.1 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-17.9%
₹110.9
52W range position
51%
₹70 - ₹110.9
ATR (14)
3.8%
₹3.5
Volume vs 20D
1.07x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.1 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹90.1 - ₹106
21.2% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
14

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -21.4% · PAT -78.9% YoY

Technical
Neutral
47

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-150.0%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
66

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Sept 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -21% YoY · PAT -79% YoY · margin compression · +15% QoQ

Filed 12 Oct 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹18.8 Cr-21.4%+15.1%
EBITDA₹5.6 Cr-61.8%+23.2%
Operating margin29.9%-3165 bps+199 bps
PAT₹1.9 Cr-78.9%+675.0%
PAT margin9.9%-2695 bps+843 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
41.70
P/B
1.47
EV/EBITDA
12.90
Market Cap
173.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
-3.61%
ROCE
12.80%
ROA
1.38%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
7.00%
EPS 5Y
7.00%
Revenue 3Y
29.00%
EPS 3Y
3.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
1.24
Interest Coverage
1.82×
Altman Z
1.71
Book Value
62.70

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
12.38%
FCF Positive Y
2/5
OCF
0.11 Cr
EPS TTM
2.22

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
65.74%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
58%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 72.4+48.9% vs prev
0122.6Mar 2022: 123Mar 2023: 33.4Mar 2024: 35.0Mar 2025: 48.6Mar 2026: 72.4FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 42.2+622.4% vs prev
-3.8078.7Mar 2022: 78.7Mar 2023: -3.8Mar 2024: 3.3Mar 2025: 5.8Mar 2026: 42.2FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 36.7+371.1% vs prev
-5.70113.1Mar 2022: 113%Mar 2023: -5.7%Mar 2024: 4.8%Mar 2025: 7.8%Mar 2026: 36.7%FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 41.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 falling (~2.0% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 41 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 17% off 52W high · 30% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

64
RS percentile
Stage 2 UptrendEstablished S2
1M return
-7.1%
3M return
+1.5%
6M return
+6.7%
1Y return
-4.1%
RS 1D
+5
RS 20D
-6
Sector rank
#18
Industry rank
#71
Stage evidence
  • Price is 2.7% above the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is above the 30-week proxy and its slope is rising +1.8%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are positive.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price above
S2 entered
10 Aug 2026
S2 age
49 trading sessions
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
261 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 106.07-0.52%
778898108118Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 26106
RS vs Nifty 500106

Valuation & peers

U-Score 14 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

14U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation2/30
Growth7/25
Quality1/20
Balance Sheet1/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
-8
Raw sum
14

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

14/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 12.4%.
  • Cash flow contributes 8/10 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 7/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.7, in distress territory.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -150.0%.
Sector valuation model

Real estate valuation: NAV, pre-sales, debt, and inventory quality

Real estate valuation depends more on project economics and balance sheet than simple PE.

Real Estate NAV
Primary lens
NAV and market cap versus project pipeline and pre-sales.
Secondary checks
Inventory age, net debt, collections, execution record.
Main risk check
Book value can overstate value if inventory is slow or debt is high.
PE
41.7
PB
1.5
EV/EBITDA
12.9
ROE
-3.6%
ROCE
12.8%
FCF Yield
12.4%
Debt/Equity
1.2
MoS
-150.0%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
14
Previous: 14
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-150.0%
Previous: -150.0%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
12
14
14
14
14

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹55.96
-62.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
16.4
Growth-justified Value
₹36.41
-150.0% MoS
PEG
7.72

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Real Estate — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
LANDSMILL
Small
Landsmill Green Limited
Real Estate
match 166
18
73.8
0.6%
-329%
OVERVALUED
NATIONSTD
Small
National Standard (India) Limited
Real Estate
match 164
31
20.1
3.5%
-71%
OVERVALUED
MERCANTILE
Small
Mercantile Ventures Limited
Real Estate
match 162
23
39.0
2.0%
-937%
OVERVALUED
RVHL
Small
Ravinder Heights Limited
Real Estate
match 158
89
4.8
16.2%
+85%
DEEP VALUE
GKWLIMITED
Small
GKW Limited
Real Estate
match 149
29
—
-0.1%
—
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

UMIYA BUILDCON LIMITED operates in the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Sept 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
66Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 49th percentile of the scored universe and 76th percentile within Real Estate. Main check: results consistency is weak at 43/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
2 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
49th percentile

overall median 67 · Real Estate: 76th pctile, median 61 · Small: 54th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

2 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
90
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
53
watch · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
43
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 65.5%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸Promoter holding increased 1.3%.
  • ▸FCF yield is 10.8%.

Trust risks

  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 1.10.
  • ▸ROE is low at -3.6%.
  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 36.9%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
AnnouncementSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Change in Registered Office Address 7 Sep - Board approved shifting registered office within Bangalore from Sept. 9, 2026.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Change in Management 14 Aug - AGM approved Ishwar & Gopal as auditors for five years; Neela Manjunath reappointed independent director from 30/09/2026.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementApr 2026

Apr 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Change in Management 27 Apr - YCRJ and Associates appointed internal auditors on 27 Apr 2026 for FY 2026-27.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.