Skip to content

Ravinder Heights Limited (RVHL)

Small Cap

Real Estate stocks · Small cap · NSE

Ravinder Heights Limited operates in the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹38.01
-0.28 · -0.73%
Market cap ₹231 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 01:21 am IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Real Estate P/E 22.2 (n=72)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

34Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -3.7% / mo · MACD + · sector -6.4pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 27
Sector RS: 44
Sector 3M: -12.0% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest FPI flow is positive, but a second consecutive positive fortnight is still required. View sector evidence

Technical chart

RVHLD candles · FIT view-10.9%
Latest close ₹38.01 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-0.7%
RSI
43
MACD hist
0.16
52W pos
29%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹38.29H ₹38.94L ₹37.33C ₹38.01Vol 4,692 sh
₹34.28₹38.86₹43.45₹48.04₹52.62₹38.012026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

RVHLNifty RealtyNifty 500
-20%-12%-4%+4%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026RVHL -16.5%Nifty Realty -11.0%Nifty 500 -5.6%
RVHL
-16.5%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Realty
-11.0%
Vs Nifty 500
-10.9 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-38.8%
₹62.2
52W range position
28%
₹28.5 - ₹62.2
ATR (14)
4.4%
₹1.7
Volume vs 20D
0.62x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹36.8 - ₹40.8
17.8% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Strong fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, but price trend argues for patience. Suitable for staggered entry or watchlist confirmation rather than aggressive buying.

Strong U-Score but weak trend: timing is not confirming the thesis.

Suggested next step
Add to watchlist
Fundamental setup is interesting, but technical confirmation is weak.
U-Score
Legacy · DEEP VALUE
89

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -92.3% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Bearish
34

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+85.3%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
76

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -92% YoY · margin compression

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹0 Cr-92.3%+0.0%
EBITDA₹-3 Cr-54.1%+29.3%
Operating margin-29900.0%-2840769 bps+1240000 bps
PAT₹-1.7 CrNDFNDF
PAT margin-16900.0%-1650000 bps+1250000 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
4.84
P/B
0.64
EV/EBITDA
3.61
Market Cap
231.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
16.20%
ROCE
22.00%
ROA
13.08%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
352.00%
EPS 5Y
64.00%
Revenue 3Y
84.00%
EPS 3Y
102.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
—
Altman Z
8.47
Book Value
59.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
5.63%
FCF Positive Y
3/5
OCF
36.00 Cr
EPS TTM
7.78

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
74.74%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
25%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 0.0+0.0% vs prev
055.0Sep 2023: 0.2Dec 2023: 0.1Mar 2024: 0.1Jun 2024: 0.1Sep 2024: 0.1Dec 2024: 0.1Mar 2025: 0.1Jun 2025: 0.1Sep 2025: 55.0Dec 2025: 20.0Mar 2026: 0.0Jun 2026: 0.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -1.7+42.5% vs prev
-2.9039.9Sep 2023: 1.7Dec 2023: -1.6Mar 2024: -0.3Jun 2024: -0.4Sep 2024: -0.1Dec 2024: -1.1Mar 2025: -0.9Jun 2025: -0.5Sep 2025: 39.9Dec 2025: 12.5Mar 2026: -2.9Jun 2026: -1.7Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 43. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~3.8% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 43 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 38% off 52W high · 33% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

25
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-3.7%
3M return
-16.5%
6M return
-13.5%
1Y return
-31.5%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
-8
Sector rank
#18
Industry rank
#71
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 7.7% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed -0.0% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 72.24+0.31%
58718498111Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2672
RS vs Nifty 50072

Valuation & peers

U-Score 89 · legacy U-Score band DEEP VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies

89U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · DEEP VALUE
Valuation30/30
Growth24/25
Quality14/20
Balance Sheet11/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
89

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

89/100 · legacy band DEEP VALUE

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 5.6%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 85.3%.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 14/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 11/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Real estate valuation: NAV, pre-sales, debt, and inventory quality

Real estate valuation depends more on project economics and balance sheet than simple PE.

Real Estate NAV
Primary lens
NAV and market cap versus project pipeline and pre-sales.
Secondary checks
Inventory age, net debt, collections, execution record.
Main risk check
Book value can overstate value if inventory is slow or debt is high.
PE
4.8
PB
0.6
EV/EBITDA
3.6
ROE
16.2%
ROCE
22.0%
FCF Yield
5.6%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+85.3%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
89
Previous: 89
Legacy U-Score band
DEEP VALUE
Previous: DEEP VALUE
Margin of safety
+85.3%
Previous: +85.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹101.63
+62.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
33.3
Growth-justified Value
₹259.07
+85.3% MoS
PEG
0.06

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Real Estate — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
NATIONSTD
Small
National Standard (India) Limited
Real Estate
match 163
31
20.1
3.5%
-71%
OVERVALUED
MERCANTILE
Small
Mercantile Ventures Limited
Real Estate
match 161
23
39.0
2.0%
-937%
OVERVALUED
UMIYA-MRO
Small
UMIYA BUILDCON LIMITED
Real Estate
match 159
14
41.7
-3.6%
-150%
OVERVALUED
LANDSMILL
Small
Landsmill Green Limited
Real Estate
match 158
18
73.8
0.6%
-329%
OVERVALUED
NILASPACES
Small
Nila Spaces Limited
Real Estate
match 158
70
13.8
16.9%
+58%
UNDERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Ravinder Heights Limited operates in the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
76Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 81st percentile of the scored universe and 92nd percentile within Real Estate. Main check: results consistency is weak at 38/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
1 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
81st percentile

overall median 67 · Real Estate: 92nd pctile, median 61 · Small: 83rd pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

1 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
88
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
82
strong · capital discipline
Results
38
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 74.7%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 5.3%.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.00.

Trust risks

  • ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 42395.2%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

9 shown
AnnouncementSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Resignation of Company Secretary / Compliance Officer 30 Sep - Company Secretary and Compliance Officer Vertika resigned effective close of business on 30 September 2026.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual reportSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Board Meeting Outcome for Outcome Of Board Meeting For Declaration Of Unaudited Standalone And Consolidated Financial Results For The Quarter Ended June 30, 2026 7 Aug - Board approved Q1 FY27 results, annual report, AGM on 26 Sep 2026, and internal auditor reappointment.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 3 Sep - Copy of Newspaper clipping regarding publication of Notice of 07th AGM and information of e-voting published in Financial Express(English) and Desh Sewak(Punjab) on September 03, …

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementJun 2026

Jun 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 8 Aug - Copies of newspaper publication for declaration of unaudited(Standalone & Consolidated) Financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 30 May - Publication of extract of Audited Finacial Results(Standalone & Consolidated) for the quarter and Financial Year ended 31st March, 2026

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Audited Financial Results For The Quarter Ended 31St March 2026 29 May - Ravinder Heights approved audited Q4 and FY26 standalone and consolidated results; auditors issued unmodified opinion.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.