Skip to content

Nila Spaces Limited (NILASPACES)

Small Cap

Real Estate stocks · Small cap · NSE

Nila Spaces Limited operates in the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹10.97
-0.08 · -0.72%
Market cap ₹431 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 04:45 am IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 04:45 am IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result03 Aug, 06:48 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Real Estate P/E 22.2 (n=72)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

32Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -9.9% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector -6.4pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 24
Sector RS: 44
Sector 3M: -12.0% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest FPI flow is positive, but a second consecutive positive fortnight is still required. View sector evidence

Technical chart

NILASPACESD candles · FIT view-16.5%
Latest close ₹10.97 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-2.1%
RSI
37
MACD hist
0.02
52W pos
3%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹11.21H ₹11.35L ₹10.85C ₹10.97Vol 4.7L sh
₹10.40₹11.81₹13.21₹14.62₹16.0352L₹10.972026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

NILASPACESNifty RealtyNifty 500
-15%-7%+1%+9%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026NILASPACES -10.2%Nifty Realty -11.0%Nifty 500 -5.6%
NILASPACES
-10.2%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Realty
-11.0%
Vs Nifty 500
-4.7 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-45.1%
₹20
52W range position
3%
₹10.7 - ₹20
ATR (14)
4.6%
₹0.5
Volume vs 20D
0.61x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.8 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹10.7 - ₹12.6
25.0% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Investable fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Add to watchlist
Fundamental setup is interesting, but technical confirmation is weak.
U-Score
Legacy · UNDERVALUED
70

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Excellent
80

Revenue +14.3% · PAT +47.3% YoY

Technical
Bearish
32

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+58.3%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
78

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Excellent · 80/100

Rev +14% YoY · PAT +47% YoY · margin expansion · operating leverage

Filed 03 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹46.7 Cr+14.3%-6.3%
EBITDA₹18.1 Cr+49.3%+3.7%
Operating margin38.7%+907 bps+372 bps
PAT₹8.6 Cr+47.3%-8.5%
PAT margin18.4%+413 bps-45 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
13.80
P/B
2.53
EV/EBITDA
7.39
Market Cap
431.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
16.90%
ROCE
30.50%
ROA
8.79%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
33.00%
EPS 5Y
67.00%
Revenue 3Y
66.00%
EPS 3Y
102.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.46
Interest Coverage
2.25×
Altman Z
3.10
Book Value
4.34

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
6/5
OCF
-29.00 Cr
EPS TTM
0.79

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
61.90%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
3%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 46.7-6.3% vs prev
058.4Sep 2023: 0.0Dec 2023: 58.4Mar 2024: 32.3Jun 2024: 31.1Sep 2024: 31.9Dec 2024: 33.0Mar 2025: 39.8Jun 2025: 40.8Sep 2025: 42.2Dec 2025: 52.2Mar 2026: 49.8Jun 2026: 46.7Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 8.6-8.5% vs prev
-0.1011.6Sep 2023: -0.1Dec 2023: 11.6Mar 2024: 2.2Jun 2024: 2.6Sep 2024: 3.7Dec 2024: 3.8Mar 2025: 4.7Jun 2025: 5.8Sep 2025: 5.3Dec 2025: 8.2Mar 2026: 9.4Jun 2026: 8.6Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 37.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~11.0% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 37 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

17
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-10.8%
3M return
-10.2%
6M return
-18.9%
1Y return
-40.8%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
-6
Sector rank
#18
Industry rank
#71
Stage evidence
  • Price is 12.8% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -2.2%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
261 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 62.66+0.30%
60718294105Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2663
RS vs Nifty 50063

Valuation & peers

U-Score 70 · legacy U-Score band UNDERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

70U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · UNDERVALUED
Valuation16/30
Growth25/25
Quality18/20
Balance Sheet7/15
Cash Flow3/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
-2
Raw sum
70

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

70/100 · legacy band UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 58.3%.
  • Growth contributes 25/25 to the score.
  • Quality contributes 18/20 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 2 points.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 3/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 7/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Real estate valuation: NAV, pre-sales, debt, and inventory quality

Real estate valuation depends more on project economics and balance sheet than simple PE.

Real Estate NAV
Primary lens
NAV and market cap versus project pipeline and pre-sales.
Secondary checks
Inventory age, net debt, collections, execution record.
Main risk check
Book value can overstate value if inventory is slow or debt is high.
PE
13.8
PB
2.5
EV/EBITDA
7.4
ROE
16.9%
ROCE
30.5%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.5
MoS
+58.3%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
70
Previous: 70
Legacy U-Score band
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+58.3%
Previous: +58.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹8.78
-24.9% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
33.3
Growth-justified Value
₹26.31
+58.3% MoS
PEG
0.17

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Real Estate — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
RVHL
Small
Ravinder Heights Limited
Real Estate
match 162
89
4.8
16.2%
+85%
DEEP VALUE
MERCANTILE
Small
Mercantile Ventures Limited
Real Estate
match 160
23
39.0
2.0%
-937%
OVERVALUED
NATIONSTD
Small
National Standard (India) Limited
Real Estate
match 160
31
20.1
3.5%
-71%
OVERVALUED
UMIYA-MRO
Small
UMIYA BUILDCON LIMITED
Real Estate
match 157
14
41.7
-3.6%
-150%
OVERVALUED
LANDSMILL
Small
Landsmill Green Limited
Real Estate
match 157
18
73.8
0.6%
-329%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Nila Spaces Limited operates in the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
78Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 86th percentile of the scored universe and 95th percentile within Real Estate. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 52/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
8 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
86th percentile

overall median 67 · Real Estate: 95th pctile, median 61 · Small: 89th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

8 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
52
watch · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
81
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
98
strong · capital discipline
Results
77
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 61.9%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸6 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸ROCE is 31.3%.

Trust risks

  • ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-29 Cr.
  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 15.3%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

10 shown
Announcement

Announcement 26 Sep - Reminds physical shareholders to update KYC details and use SEBI transfer window.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 4 Sep

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 13 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 4 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 8 Jul

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 7 Jul

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 24 Jun

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.