Skip to content

GKW Limited (GKWLIMITED)

Small Cap

Real Estate stocks · Small cap · NSE

GKW Limited operates in the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹1,527.2
-20.60 · -1.33%
Market cap ₹925 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 01:06 am IST
Score22 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Real Estate P/E 22.2 (n=72)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

37Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -1.9% / mo · MACD + · sector -5.2pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 32
Sector RS: 45
Sector 3M: -10.8% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

GKWLIMITEDD candles · FIT view-1.9%
Latest close ₹1527.20 on 2026-10-21
Bar
+0.1%
RSI
43
MACD hist
0.70
52W pos
27%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹1525.00H ₹1555.50L ₹1501.00C ₹1527.20Vol 3,087 sh
₹1.48k₹1.60k₹1.72k₹1.83k₹1.95k52H₹1527.202026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

GKWLIMITEDNifty RealtyNifty 500
-16%-9%-3%+4%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026GKWLIMITED -9.3%Nifty Realty -13.1%Nifty 500 -6.5%
GKWLIMITED
-9.3%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Realty
-13.1%
Vs Nifty 500
-2.8 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-21.2%
₹1,937.8
52W range position
27%
₹1,375 - ₹1,937.8
ATR (14)
3.1%
₹46.6
Volume vs 20D
1.09x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.5 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹1,501 - ₹1,619.6
21.2% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
29

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue +0.0% · PAT -21.4% YoY

Technical
Bearish
37

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
—

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
58

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev 0% YoY · PAT -21% YoY · margin compression

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹15 Cr+0.0%NDF
EBITDA₹12 Cr-7.7%+300.0%
Operating margin84.0%-200 bpsNDF
PAT₹11 Cr-21.4%NDF
PAT margin73.3%-2000 bpsNDF

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
—
P/B
0.35
EV/EBITDA
229.62
Market Cap
925.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
-0.11%
ROCE
0.47%
ROA
-0.17%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-4.00%
EPS 5Y
16.00%
Revenue 3Y
16.00%
EPS 3Y
13.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
0.04×
Altman Z
2.34
Book Value
4367.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.13%
FCF Positive Y
6/5
OCF
20.72 Cr
EPS TTM
-8.89

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
75.00%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
29%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 15.0+475.0% vs prev
-4.0015.0Sep 2023: 11.0Dec 2023: 10.0Mar 2024: 8.0Jun 2024: 10.0Sep 2024: 14.0Dec 2024: 1.0Mar 2025: 7.0Jun 2025: 15.0Sep 2025: 11.0Dec 2025: 10.0Mar 2026: -4.0Jun 2026: 15.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 11.0+283.3% vs prev
-31.0014.0Sep 2023: 7.0Dec 2023: 6.0Mar 2024: -4.0Jun 2024: 2.0Sep 2024: 7.0Dec 2024: -31.0Mar 2025: 4.0Jun 2025: 14.0Sep 2025: -16.0Dec 2025: 5.0Mar 2026: -6.0Jun 2026: 11.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 43.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~1.9% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 43 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 21% off 52W high · 11% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

50
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-2.8%
3M return
-9.3%
6M return
-0.8%
1Y return
-16.6%
RS 1D
-2
RS 20D
+4
Sector rank
#18
Industry rank
#69
Stage evidence
  • Price is 6.7% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -0.7%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 95.51-0.41%
8894101107114Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2696
RS vs Nifty 50096

Valuation & peers

U-Score 29 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

29U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation5/30
Growth8/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet9/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
29

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

29/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Balance sheet contributes 9/15 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 8/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 5/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 8/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Real estate valuation: NAV, pre-sales, debt, and inventory quality

Real estate valuation depends more on project economics and balance sheet than simple PE.

Real Estate NAV
Primary lens
NAV and market cap versus project pipeline and pre-sales.
Secondary checks
Inventory age, net debt, collections, execution record.
Main risk check
Book value can overstate value if inventory is slow or debt is high.
PE
—
PB
0.3
EV/EBITDA
229.6
ROE
-0.1%
ROCE
0.5%
FCF Yield
0.1%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
—
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 22 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
29
Previous: 29
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
—
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

22 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
33.3
Growth-justified Value
—
— MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Real Estate — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
MERCANTILE
Small
Mercantile Ventures Limited
Real Estate
match 160
23
39.0
2.0%
-937%
OVERVALUED
NATIONSTD
Small
National Standard (India) Limited
Real Estate
match 160
31
20.1
3.5%
-71%
OVERVALUED
NILASPACES
Small
Nila Spaces Limited
Real Estate
match 159
73
13.8
16.9%
+61%
UNDERVALUED
LANDSMILL
Small
Landsmill Green Limited
Real Estate
match 159
18
73.8
0.6%
-309%
OVERVALUED
UMIYA-MRO
Small
UMIYA BUILDCON LIMITED
Real Estate
match 159
14
41.7
-3.6%
-141%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

GKW Limited operates in the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
58Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 22nd percentile of the scored universe and 38th percentile within Real Estate. Main check: results consistency is weak at 5/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
22nd percentile

overall median 67 · Real Estate: 38th pctile, median 61 · Small: 25th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
66
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
5
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 75%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is positive at 0.1%.
  • ▸6 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸Interest coverage is 0.0x.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 0.5%.
  • ▸ROE is low at -0.1%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

3 shown
Annual reportJul 2026

Jul 2026 · General Updates 10 July 2026 - GKW Limited to hold 96th AGM on 3 August 2026; shares annual report link and KYC update request.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Annual Report 2026

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2025

Mar 2025 · Annual Report 2025

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.