Skip to content

Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art Ltd. (SHUBHLAXMI)

SME Cap

Consumer stocks · SME cap · NSE

Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art Ltd. operates in Jewellery, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹16.35
+0.75 · +4.81%
Market cap ₹17.4 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result01 Jun, 07:58 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags04 Oct 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

23Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -9.5% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -4.6pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 31
Sector 3M: -10.2% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

SHUBHLAXMID candles · FIT view-29.1%
Latest close ₹16.35 on 2026-10-21
Bar
+0.0%
RSI
40
MACD hist
-0.02
52W pos
10%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹16.35H ₹16.35L ₹16.35C ₹16.35Vol 1,000 sh
₹14.27₹18.30₹22.33₹26.35₹30.38₹16.35VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-072026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

SHUBHLAXMINifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
-25%-13%-1%+12%21 Jul9 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026SHUBHLAXMI -17.6%Nifty Consumer Durabl… -11.0%Nifty 500 -6.5%
SHUBHLAXMI
-17.6%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Consumer Durables
-11.0%
Vs Nifty 500
-11.1 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-59.1%
₹40
52W range position
11%
₹13.4 - ₹40
ATR (14)
4.6%
₹0.8
Volume vs 20D
0.18x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹15 - ₹20.1
53.2% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
26

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -3.3% · PAT -641.4% YoY

Technical
Bearish
23

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-282.9%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
61

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -3% YoY · PAT -641% YoY · margin compression · +80% QoQ

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹40.3 Cr-3.3%+79.9%
EBITDA₹-1.5 CrNDF-136.1%
Operating margin-3.7%NDF-2215 bps
PAT₹-1.6 Cr-641.4%-159.7%
PAT margin-3.9%NDF-1565 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
16.40
P/B
0.74
EV/EBITDA
10.64
Market Cap
17.40Cr

Profitability

ROE
4.59%
ROCE
7.22%
ROA
2.02%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
16.00%
EPS 5Y
-8.00%
Revenue 3Y
-7.00%
EPS 3Y
1.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.57
Interest Coverage
2.44×
Altman Z
2.21
Book Value
22.30

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
4.43%
FCF Positive Y
5/5
OCF
0.80 Cr
EPS TTM
1.00

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
57.31%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
10%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 40.3+79.9% vs prev
041.9Sep 2020: 8.5Mar 2021: 20.7Sep 2021: 23.7Mar 2022: 38.0Sep 2022: 35.7Mar 2023: 41.9Sep 2023: 26.7Mar 2024: 41.6Sep 2024: 24.0Mar 2025: 31.1Sep 2025: 22.4Mar 2026: 40.3Q2 20FY21Q2 21FY22Q2 22FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -1.6-159.7% vs prev
-1.602.6Sep 2020: 0.7Mar 2021: 0.9Sep 2021: 0.4Mar 2022: 0.4Sep 2022: 0.4Mar 2023: 0.6Sep 2023: 0.9Mar 2024: 0.3Sep 2024: 0.9Mar 2025: -0.0Sep 2025: 2.6Mar 2026: -1.6Q2 20FY21Q2 21FY22Q2 22FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 40. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~10.5% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 40 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 59% off 52W high · 19% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

32
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-4.4%
3M return
-37.4%
6M return
-41.6%
1Y return
-1.8%
RS 1D
+11
RS 20D
+8
Sector rank
#8
Industry rank
#24
Stage evidence
  • Price is 30.7% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -10.2%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
207 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 105.74+5.78%
75117160202245Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 26106
RS vs Nifty 500106

Valuation & peers

U-Score 26 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

26U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation12/30
Growth4/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet7/15
Cash Flow7/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
26

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

26/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 4.4%.
  • Cash flow contributes 7/10 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 7/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -282.9%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
16.4
PB
0.7
EV/EBITDA
10.6
ROE
4.6%
ROCE
7.2%
FCF Yield
4.4%
Debt/Equity
0.6
MoS
-282.9%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
26
Previous: 26
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-282.9%
Previous: -265.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹22.4
+27.0% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
4.3
Growth-justified Value
₹4.27
-282.9% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
UTSSAV
SME
Utssav CZ Gold Jewels Ltd.
Retail
match 78
55
34.5
36.4%
-23%
FAIR VALUE
PUSHPA
SME
Pushpa Jewellers Ltd.
Retail
match 77
67
10.8
25.2%
+66%
UNDERVALUED
KKJEWELS
SME
Kabra Jewels Ltd.
Retail
match 76
72
5.5
26.8%
+82%
UNDERVALUED
DIVINEHIRA
SME
Divine Hira Jewellers Ltd.
Retail
match 75
39
68.9
15.1%
-53%
WATCHLIST
SILGO
Small
Silgo Retail Limited
Retail
match 74
23
33.0
5.8%
+1%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art Ltd. operates in Jewellery, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
61Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 32nd percentile of the scored universe and 34th percentile within Consumer. Main check: results consistency is weak at 19/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
1 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
32nd percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 34th pctile, median 66 · SME: 36th pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

1 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
90
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
65
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
19
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 57.3%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸Promoter holding increased 1.1%.
  • ▸FCF yield is positive at 3.8%.

Trust risks

  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 6.9%.
  • ▸ROE is low at 4.6%.
  • ▸0/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

3 shown
Announcement

Disclosure under SEBI Takeover Regulations 9 Jul - Unreadable OCR text; announcement content cannot be determined.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.