Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Credit Rating 14 Oct - India Ratings affirmed SBFC-originated Prime Trust LAP Aug 22 notes at IND AA(SO)/Stable and IND BBB-(SO)/Stable.
Source: Bse
Financial Services stocks · Large cap · NSE
SBFC Finance is an NBFC focused on secured MSME loans (₹5-30 lakh ticket size) and loans against gold (LAG). It operates with a pan-India footprint of 251 branches across 18 states and 2 UTs, targeting underserved, underbanked informal customers with a tech-driven lending lifecycle.
full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -11.1% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Today's candle is provisional from the latest intraday quote; completed-candle scans remain unchanged.
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue +26.6% · PAT +28.7% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Rev +27% YoY · PAT +29% YoY · +8% QoQ
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹491 Cr | +26.6% | +8.2% |
| EBITDA | NDF | NDF | NDF |
| Operating margin | NDF | NDF | NDF |
| PAT | ₹130 Cr | +28.7% | +5.7% |
| PAT margin | 26.5% | +45 bps | -61 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 20/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 35.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 19 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
SBFC reported strong FY26 performance with AUM up 29% YoY to ₹11,270 Cr and PAT up 31% YoY to ₹451 Cr. Q4 FY26 saw AUM grow 8% QoQ, but Net NPA increased to 1.54% and PCR declined to 41.64%.
While SBFC delivered robust AUM and PAT growth for FY26, the sequential increase in Net NPA and credit costs, coupled with a declining Provision Coverage Ratio in Q4, suggests potential asset quality pressures. The strong growth in branches and tech adoption are positives, but credit underwriting effectiveness needs close monitoring.
Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.
Targeting the ₹5 lakh - ₹30 lakh MSME financing market, a large segment of ₹4 lakh crore growing at 24% CAGR.
Diversified pan-India network with 251 branches across 18 states & 2 UTs, adding 46 branches YoY.
Engineering the lending lifecycle through paperless, multilingual, and API-led workflows, improving control and customer experience.
Co-origination disbursements of ₹122 Cr in Q4 FY26, validating profitable origination and contributing 19% to total Secured MSME loans.
Added 46 branches YoY and 21 branches QoQ, reaching a total of 251 branches by Q4 FY26.
The market size for ₹5 lakh - ₹30 lakh MSME financing is ₹4 lakh crore, growing at a CAGR of 24% (FY18-FY25).
Over 89% of AUM is from customers with CIBIL scores above 700, indicating strong credit profiles.
Net NPA increased to 1.54% in Q4 FY26 from 1.48% in Q3 FY26. Credit cost also rose QoQ.
Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR) declined to 41.64% in Q4 FY26 from 46.21% in Q3 FY26.
Credit Cost / Average AUM increased to 1.38% in Q4 FY26 from 1.29% in Q3 FY26.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
YoY comparison is crucial for assessing annual growth trends and overall financial health, especially for a full fiscal year report. QoQ comparison is vital for understanding recent operational momentum, asset quality shifts, and sequential efficiency improvements.
AUM grew 29% YoY to ₹11,270 crore for FY26. Q4 FY26 AUM grew 8% QoQ.
Secured MSME disbursement value grew 16% YoY to ₹3,107 crore for FY26. Q4 FY26 disbursement value grew 12% QoQ to ₹785 crore.
Spread for FY26 was 8.99% (+57 bps YoY). Q4 FY26 spread was 9.09% (+5 bps QoQ).
Cost of Borrowing for FY26 was 8.85% (-48 bps YoY). Q4 FY26 borrowing cost was 8.52% (-22 bps QoQ from Q3 FY26).
Tailored to service underserved, underbanked informal customers, with deep understanding of customer behavior and local markets.
Tested credit underwriting and risk management framework, including evaluation of documented and non-documented income, historical asset creation, and reference checks.
Engineering the lending lifecycle through technology, with paperless, multilingual, and API-led workflows to reduce friction and improve control.
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| Net NPA | 1.54% (Q4 FY26) | Stability or reduction in Net NPA to confirm asset quality control. |
| Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR) | 41.64% (Q4 FY26) | Improvement in PCR to strengthen buffer against potential defaults. |
| Credit Cost / Average AUM | 1.38% (Q4 FY26) | Moderation or decline in credit costs, indicating better risk management. |
| AUM Growth & Quality | +29% YoY (FY26) | Sustained AUM growth while maintaining or improving asset quality metrics. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 18th percentile of the scored universe and 31st percentile within Financial Services. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 28/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Financial Services: 31st pctile, median 62 · Large: 10th pctile, median 73
55 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse