Ugro Capital Limited (UGROCAP)
Small CapFinancial Services stocks · Small cap · NSE
Ugro Capital Limited operates in MSME Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Weak fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026
Average · 30/100YoY data unavailable — classification deferred
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹497 Cr | NDF | -18.1% |
| EBITDA | NDF | NDF | NDF |
| Operating margin | NDF | NDF | NDF |
| PAT | ₹68 Cr | NDF | +33.3% |
| PAT margin | 13.7% | NDF | +528 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Issuer presentation review pending
Ugro Capital Limited operates in MSME Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Trend score and candlestick chart
18Strong Bearfull bear SMA stack · SMA20 -7.0% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low
Technical chart
UGROCAPdaily · 1Y · AUTO-17.6%Daily technical trend read
Mixed signalsSignals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 36. Wait for confirmation.
- Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
- SMA20 falling (~7.5% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 36 — rising, no extreme reading.
- MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
- 55% off 52W high · 8% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 22 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 22 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Fundamental score breakdown
OVERVALUEDWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Valuation contributes 20/30 to the score.
- Cash flow contributes 1/10 to the score.
- Growth contributes 0/25 to the score.
Main drags
- Altman Z is 0.4, in distress territory.
- Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -59.5%.
- Growth is weaker at 0/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality
Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Factor attribution
Modelled fair value
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Weak Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 4th percentile of the scored universe and 6th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 22/100.
Mixed Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: Debt/equity is 3.71.
Management or financial behaviour needs caution. Demand stronger valuation compensation.
overall median 67 · Financial Services: 6th pctile, median 62 · Small: 5th pctile, median 66
123 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Weak Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
Trust risks
- ▸Debt/equity is 3.71.
- ▸Altman Z is 0.42.
- ▸Promoter holding is only 2.9%.
- ▸Only 0 years of positive FCF.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 7.67
- P/B
- 0.46
- EV/EBITDA
- 173.19
- Market Cap
- 1341.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 6.02%
- ROCE
- —
- ROA
- 1.24%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- -6.00%
- EPS 5Y
- -6.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- -33.00%
- EPS 3Y
- -33.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 3.71
- Interest Coverage
- —
- Altman Z
- 0.42
- Book Value
- 187.00
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 0/5
- OCF
- 214.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 11.26
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 2.88%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 6%
Financial History
Updated 5/9/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable names in Financial Services, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable names in Financial Services, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.