Skip to content

Regency Ceramics Limited (REGENCERAM)

Small Cap

Industrials stocks · Small cap · NSE

Regency Ceramics Limited operates in Cement, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹30.02
-1.74 · -5.48%
Market cap ₹86 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 05:56 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 05:56 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result13 Aug, 05:43 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage10/14 · 71%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Industrials P/E 26.2 (n=537)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

31Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -6.6% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 50
Sector 3M: -6.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

REGENCERAMD candles · FIT view-32.4%
Latest close ₹30.02 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-5.5%
RSI
38
MACD hist
-0.07
52W pos
6%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹31.76H ₹32.25L ₹28.40C ₹30.02Vol 14,582 sh
₹27.15₹34.00₹40.85₹47.70₹54.5452L₹30.022026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

REGENCERAMNifty India ManufacturingNifty 500
-20%-8%+3%+15%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026REGENCERAM -16.8%Nifty India Manufactu… -5.8%Nifty 500 -5.6%
REGENCERAM
-16.8%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty India Manufacturing
-5.8%
Vs Nifty 500
-11.2 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-45.4%
₹55
52W range position
6%
₹28.4 - ₹55
ATR (14)
8.8%
₹2.7
Volume vs 20D
0.73x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.1 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹28.4 - ₹39.2
50.3% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
17

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Average
32

Revenue +172.8% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Bearish
31

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
—

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
60

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 32/100

margin compression · Rev +173% YoY · +63% QoQ

Filed 13 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹18.3 Cr+172.8%+62.8%
EBITDA₹-15.3 Cr-267.7%-29.8%
Operating margin-83.3%-2149 bps+2119 bps
PAT₹-2.6 CrNDFNDF
PAT margin-14.0%+1515 bps+9690 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
—
P/B
—
EV/EBITDA
—
Market Cap
86.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
—
ROCE
-116.00%
ROA
-19.83%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
76.00%
EPS 5Y
76.00%
Revenue 3Y
152.00%
EPS 3Y
-4.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
-34.00×
Altman Z
-1.54
Book Value
-31.80

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
2/5
OCF
-34.00 Cr
EPS TTM
-9.24

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
60.43%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
13%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 38.0+192.3% vs prev
038.0Mar 2017: 0.0Mar 2018: 0.0Mar 2019: 0.0Mar 2020: 0.0Mar 2021: 0.0Mar 2022: 0.0Mar 2023: 0.0Mar 2024: 2.0Mar 2025: 13.0Mar 2026: 38.0FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -24.0-1300.0% vs prev
-24.0032.0Mar 2017: -7.0Mar 2018: 3.0Mar 2019: -5.0Mar 2020: -1.0Mar 2021: -5.0Mar 2022: 32.0Mar 2023: -16.0Mar 2024: -10.0Mar 2025: 2.0Mar 2026: -24.0FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
No data

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 38.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~7.0% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 38 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 45% off 52W high · 6% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

14
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-7.8%
3M return
-16.8%
6M return
-32.5%
1Y return
-35.7%
RS 1D
-2
RS 20D
-3
Sector rank
#2
Industry rank
#74
Stage evidence
  • Price is 21.9% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.5%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 75.32-4.50%
728598111125Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2675
RS vs Nifty 50075

Valuation & peers

U-Score 17 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

17U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation2/30
Growth13/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet7/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
4/9 (+1)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
17

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

17/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Growth contributes 13/25 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 7/15 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 1/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is -1.5, in distress territory.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
—
PB
—
EV/EBITDA
—
ROE
—
ROCE
-116.0%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
—
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
17
Previous: 17
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
—
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
39.3
Growth-justified Value
—
— MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Industrials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
BVCL
Small
Barak Valley Cements Limited
Cement
match 171
20
45.2
0.2%
-3027%
OVERVALUED
NIRAJ
Small
Niraj Cement Structurals Limited
Cement
match 160
53
7.0
8.2%
+83%
FAIR VALUE
SAGCEM
Small
Sagar Cements Limited
Cement
match 154
17
101.0
-0.3%
-2622%
OVERVALUED
APCL
Small
Anjani Portland Cement Limited
Cement
match 154
16
—
-10.1%
—
OVERVALUED
SHREDIGCEM
Small
Shree Digvijay Cement Co.Ltd
Cement
match 154
14
54.5
6.8%
-1605%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Regency Ceramics Limited operates in Cement, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
60Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 28th percentile of the scored universe and 24th percentile within Industrials. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 40/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
4 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
28th percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 24th pctile, median 68 · Small: 32nd pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

4 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
40
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
80
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
48
watch · capital discipline
Results
50
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 60.4%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.00.
  • ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-34 Cr.
  • ▸ROCE is low at -116%.
  • ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 109.7%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 8 Sep

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 14 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 1 Jun

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.