Skip to content

Anjani Portland Cement Limited (APCL)

Small Cap

Industrials stocks · Small cap · NSE

Anjani Portland Cement Limited operates in Cement, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹89.49
-0.51 · -0.57%
Market cap ₹276 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result12 Aug, 07:03 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Industrials P/E 26.2 (n=537)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

31Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -7.4% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 50
Sector 3M: -6.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

APCLD candles · FIT view-21.1%
Latest close ₹89.49 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-0.6%
RSI
33
MACD hist
-0.13
52W pos
3%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹90.00H ₹90.00L ₹88.00C ₹89.49Vol 1,020 sh
₹85.53₹96.39₹107.25₹118.11₹128.9752L₹89.492026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

APCLNifty India ManufacturingNifty 500
-15%-7%-0%+7%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026APCL -11.8%Nifty India Manufactu… -5.8%Nifty 500 -5.6%
APCL
-11.8%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty India Manufacturing
-5.8%
Vs Nifty 500
-6.2 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-39.9%
₹148.8
52W range position
3%
₹87.5 - ₹148.8
ATR (14)
4.5%
₹4
Volume vs 20D
0.18x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹87.5 - ₹104.7
23.2% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
16

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -35.7% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Bearish
31

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
—

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
53

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -36% YoY · margin compression

Filed 12 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹89.8 Cr-35.7%-27.6%
EBITDA₹1.4 Cr-89.1%-90.0%
Operating margin1.5%-740 bps-944 bps
PAT₹-9.8 CrNDF-693.9%
PAT margin-10.9%-845 bps-1225 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
—
P/B
0.75
EV/EBITDA
10.05
Market Cap
276.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
-10.10%
ROCE
0.04%
ROA
-3.61%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-25.00%
EPS 5Y
-25.00%
Revenue 3Y
-12.00%
EPS 3Y
14.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.75
Interest Coverage
0.81×
Altman Z
1.49
Book Value
126.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
78.26%
FCF Positive Y
6/5
OCF
-29.00 Cr
EPS TTM
-11.04

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
75.00%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
4%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 455+5.8% vs prev
0801.0Mar 2009: 150Mar 2010: 144Mar 2011: 193Mar 2012: 311Mar 2013: 305Mar 2022: 801Mar 2023: 662Mar 2024: 624Mar 2025: 430Mar 2026: 455FY09FY10FY11FY12FY13FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -26.0+67.9% vs prev
-81.0042.0Mar 2009: 17.0Mar 2010: 12.0Mar 2011: 1.0Mar 2012: 17.0Mar 2013: 4.0Mar 2022: 42.0Mar 2023: -58.0Mar 2024: -39.0Mar 2025: -81.0Mar 2026: -26.0FY09FY10FY11FY12FY13FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: -7.0+81.5% vs prev
-38.0029.8Mar 2009: 29.8%Mar 2010: 17.9%Mar 2011: 1.5%Mar 2012: 21.3%Mar 2013: 4.7%Mar 2022: 13.2%Mar 2023: -17.4%Mar 2024: -13.3%Mar 2025: -38.0%Mar 2026: -7.0%FY09FY10FY11FY12FY13FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 33. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~8.0% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 33 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

26
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-8.5%
3M return
-11.8%
6M return
-20.9%
1Y return
-28.4%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
+4
Sector rank
#2
Industry rank
#74
Stage evidence
  • Price is 16.1% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.4%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 68.01+0.47%
65768697108Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2668
RS vs Nifty 50068

Valuation & peers

U-Score 16 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

16U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation6/30
Growth1/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet4/15
Cash Flow7/10
Piotroski
2/9 (+0)
Penalties
-2
Raw sum
16

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

16/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 78.3%.
  • Cash flow contributes 7/10 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 4/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.5, in distress territory.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 2 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
—
PB
0.8
EV/EBITDA
10.1
ROE
-10.1%
ROCE
0.0%
FCF Yield
78.3%
Debt/Equity
0.8
MoS
—
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
16
Previous: 16
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
—
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
1.9
Growth-justified Value
—
— MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Industrials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
ACL
Small
Andhra Cements Limited
Cement
match 168
13
—
-64.0%
—
OVERVALUED
REGENCERAM
Small
Regency Ceramics Limited
Cement
match 165
17
—
—
—
OVERVALUED
BVCL
Small
Barak Valley Cements Limited
Cement
match 165
20
45.2
0.2%
-3027%
OVERVALUED
NIRAJ
Small
Niraj Cement Structurals Limited
Cement
match 165
53
7.0
8.2%
+83%
FAIR VALUE
SAURASHCEM
Small
Saurashtra Cement Limited
Cement
match 160
35
35.7
2.3%
-3484%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Anjani Portland Cement Limited operates in Cement, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
53Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 12th percentile of the scored universe and 9th percentile within Industrials. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 30/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
6 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
12th percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 9th pctile, median 68 · Small: 14th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

6 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
74
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
33
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
30
weak · capital discipline
Results
33
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 75%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 72.5%.
  • ▸6 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-29 Cr.
  • ▸Altman Z is 1.51.
  • ▸Interest coverage is 0.8x.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 0%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Annual report

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 19 Aug - Newspaper publication on dispatch of 42nd AGM notice and Annual Report

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual report

Reg. 34 (1) Annual Report. 18 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 15 Aug - Copy of Newspaper Publication - AGM notice

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 13 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.