Skip to content

Sagar Cements Limited (SAGCEM)

Small Cap

Industrials stocks · Small cap · NSE

Sagar Cements Limited operates in Cement, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹126.77
-1.80 · -1.40%
Market cap ₹1,943 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 22 Oct, 05:50 pm IST
Details
Quote22 Oct, 05:50 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result27 Jul, 09:55 pm IST
Score22 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Industrials P/E 26.2 (n=537)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

31Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -7.4% / mo · RSI oversold · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 22
Sector RS: 45
Sector 3M: -7.4% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

SAGCEMD candles · FIT view-30.8%
Latest close ₹126.77 on 2026-10-22
Bar
-1.4%
RSI
15
MACD hist
-1.34
52W pos
1%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-22O ₹128.57H ₹130.49L ₹125.19C ₹126.77Vol 56,072 sh
₹121.48₹141.88₹162.29₹182.69₹203.1052L₹126.772026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

SAGCEMNifty India ManufacturingNifty 500
-33%-20%-6%+8%22 Jul3 Sept22 Oct22 Oct 2026SAGCEM -29.8%Nifty India Manufactu… -7.7%Nifty 500 -6.2%
SAGCEM
-29.8%
Nifty 500
-6.2%
Nifty India Manufacturing
-7.7%
Vs Nifty 500
-23.5 pp
Chart stats
22 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-49.7%
₹252
52W range position
1%
₹125.2 - ₹252
ATR (14)
4.2%
₹5.3
Volume vs 20D
1.36x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.6 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹125.2 - ₹155
18.1% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
17

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue +5.2% · PAT -500.0% YoY

Technical
Bearish
31

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-2511.6%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
50

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -500% YoY · margin compression · Rev +5% YoY

Filed 27 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹706 Cr+5.2%-10.3%
EBITDA₹72 Cr-40.5%-12.2%
Operating margin10.0%-800 bps+0 bps
PAT₹-28 Cr-500.0%-128.0%
PAT margin-4.0%-501 bps-1668 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
101.00
P/B
1.18
EV/EBITDA
11.23
Market Cap
1943.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
-0.31%
ROCE
1.93%
ROA
0.69%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
5.00%
EPS 5Y
-13.00%
Revenue 3Y
-3.00%
EPS 3Y
-15.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.31
Interest Coverage
1.41×
Altman Z
2.85
Book Value
126.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.26%
FCF Positive Y
5/5
OCF
104.00 Cr
EPS TTM
1.48

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
48.33%
Promoter Pledge
30.00%
Momentum 52W
6%

Financial History

Updated 22/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 706-10.3% vs prev
0787.0Sep 2023: 587Dec 2023: 669Mar 2024: 709Jun 2024: 561Sep 2024: 475Dec 2024: 564Mar 2025: 658Jun 2025: 671Sep 2025: 602Dec 2025: 591Mar 2026: 787Jun 2026: 706Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -28.0-128.0% vs prev
-73.00100.0Sep 2023: -11.0Dec 2023: -10.0Mar 2024: 12.0Jun 2024: -32.0Sep 2024: -57.0Dec 2024: -54.0Mar 2025: -73.0Jun 2025: 7.0Sep 2025: -44.0Dec 2025: -64.0Mar 2026: 100Jun 2026: -28.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 15.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~8.0% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 15 — oversold zone; bounce conditions.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

10
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-16.2%
3M return
-29.8%
6M return
-31.2%
1Y return
-43.7%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
-3
Sector rank
#3
Industry rank
#76
Stage evidence
  • Price is 25.0% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.0%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
263 observations
22 Oct 2026Value 53.14-0.77%
51647790103Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2653
RS vs Nifty 50053

Valuation & peers

U-Score 17 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

17U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation4/30
Growth3/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet4/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
4/9 (+1)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
17

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

17/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 4/15 to the score.
  • Valuation contributes 4/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Promoter pledge is 30.0%.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -2511.6%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
101.0
PB
1.2
EV/EBITDA
11.2
ROE
-0.3%
ROCE
1.9%
FCF Yield
0.3%
Debt/Equity
0.3
MoS
-2511.6%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 22 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
17
Previous: 17
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-2511.6%
Previous: -2548.5%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

22 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹64.77
-95.7% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
3.3
Growth-justified Value
₹4.85
-2511.6% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Industrials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
SOMANYCERA
Small
Somany Ceramics Limited
Cement
match 168
33
22.8
10.4%
-98%
WATCHLIST
SHREDIGCEM
Small
Shree Digvijay Cement Co.Ltd
Cement
match 167
14
54.5
6.8%
-1537%
OVERVALUED
MANGLMCEM
Small
Mangalam Cement Limited
Cement
match 166
41
21.0
16.3%
+28%
WATCHLIST
HEIDELBERG
Small
HeidelbergCement India Limited
Cement
match 165
33
24.3
10.1%
-707%
WATCHLIST
DECCANCE
Small
Deccan Cements Limited
Cement
match 165
11
—
1.9%
-1305%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Sagar Cements Limited operates in Cement, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
50Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 7th percentile of the scored universe and 5th percentile within Industrials. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 39/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
92 docs text-extracted · 70 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
7th percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 5th pctile, median 68 · Small: 9th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

92 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
46
watch · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
39
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
53
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸5 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸Promoter pledge is elevated at 30%.
  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 1.01.
  • ▸Interest coverage is 1.2x.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 29 Sep - Please refer to the letter attached

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 30 Jul

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 29 Jul - We forward here with the newspaper publication of financial results for the quarter ended 30.06.2026

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 30 May

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.