Skip to content

Mangalam Cement Limited (MANGLMCEM)

Small Cap

Industrials stocks · Small cap · NSE

Mangalam Cement Limited operates in Cement, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹933.95
-32.90 · -3.40%
Market cap ₹2,724 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 01:43 am IST
Score22 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Industrials P/E 26.2 (n=537)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

44Neutral

SMA20 -6.3% / mo · MACD −

Stock trend: 44
Sector RS: 44
Sector 3M: -7.1% vs Nifty 500 -5.2%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

MANGLMCEMD candles · FIT view+1.8%
Latest close ₹933.95 on 2026-10-21
Bar
-3.7%
RSI
36
MACD hist
-3.46
52W pos
58%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹969.85H ₹999.00L ₹930.00C ₹933.95Vol 92,478 sh
₹771.71₹862.93₹954.15₹1.05k₹1.14k52H₹933.952026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

MANGLMCEMNifty India ManufacturingNifty 500
-14%-4%+5%+14%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026MANGLMCEM -4.7%Nifty India Manufactu… -7.7%Nifty 500 -6.5%
MANGLMCEM
-4.7%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty India Manufacturing
-7.7%
Vs Nifty 500
+1.8 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-16.6%
₹1,120
52W range position
58%
₹679.4 - ₹1,120
ATR (14)
3.6%
₹33.3
Volume vs 20D
1.61x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹5.9 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹930 - ₹1,052.4
24.5% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · WATCHLIST
41

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue +0.7% · PAT -43.8% YoY

Technical
Neutral
44

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+28.3%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
66

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -44% YoY · margin compression · Rev +1% YoY

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹455 Cr+0.7%-7.1%
EBITDA₹53 Cr-29.3%-1.9%
Operating margin12.0%-500 bps+100 bps
PAT₹18 Cr-43.8%-72.3%
PAT margin4.0%-312 bps-931 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
21.00
P/B
2.79
EV/EBITDA
12.99
Market Cap
2724.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
16.30%
ROCE
11.00%
ROA
4.74%
Dividend Y
0.15%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
6.00%
EPS 5Y
10.00%
Revenue 3Y
-1.00%
EPS 3Y
81.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.91
Interest Coverage
2.95×
Altman Z
2.82
Book Value
355.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
9/5
OCF
94.00 Cr
EPS TTM
41.73

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
40.01%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
71%

Financial History

Updated 22/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 1,758+4.6% vs prev
01802Mar 2017: 1,045Mar 2018: 1,080Mar 2019: 1,200Mar 2020: 1,228Mar 2021: 1,305Mar 2022: 1,566Mar 2023: 1,802Mar 2024: 1,725Mar 2025: 1,681Mar 2026: 1,758FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 129+186.7% vs prev
-10.00129.0Mar 2017: 37.0Mar 2018: 11.0Mar 2019: -10.0Mar 2020: 76.0Mar 2021: 93.0Mar 2022: 78.0Mar 2023: 17.0Mar 2024: 60.0Mar 2025: 45.0Mar 2026: 129FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 13.2+149.8% vs prev
-2.0013.9Mar 2017: 7.3%Mar 2018: 2.1%Mar 2019: -2.0%Mar 2020: 13.2%Mar 2021: 13.9%Mar 2022: 10.5%Mar 2023: 2.3%Mar 2024: 7.4%Mar 2025: 5.3%Mar 2026: 13.2%FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 36.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 falling (~6.8% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 36 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 17% off 52W high · 37% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

75
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-7.5%
3M return
-4.7%
6M return
+1.2%
1Y return
+20.3%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
-2
Sector rank
#2
Industry rank
#76
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 0.8% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +2.0% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price above
Sector
leading
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 130.09-2.50%
84100115131146Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 26130
RS vs Nifty 500130

Valuation & peers

U-Score 41 · legacy U-Score band WATCHLIST · valuation evidence and comparable companies

41U-SCORE
WATCHLIST

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · WATCHLIST
Valuation8/30
Growth12/25
Quality9/20
Balance Sheet3/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
41

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

41/100 · legacy band WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 28.3%.
  • Growth contributes 12/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Balance sheet is weaker at 3/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 8/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
21.0
PB
2.8
EV/EBITDA
13.0
ROE
16.3%
ROCE
11.0%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.9
MoS
+28.3%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 22 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
41
Previous: 41
Legacy U-Score band
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
+28.3%
Previous: +28.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

22 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
41
41
40
38
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹577.34
-61.8% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
31.2
Growth-justified Value
₹1,302.81
+28.3% MoS
PEG
1.31

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Industrials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
SOMANYCERA
Small
Somany Ceramics Limited
Cement
match 171
33
22.8
10.4%
-98%
WATCHLIST
HEIDELBERG
Small
HeidelbergCement India Limited
Cement
match 171
33
24.3
10.1%
-707%
WATCHLIST
SAGCEM
Small
Sagar Cements Limited
Cement
match 167
17
101.0
-0.3%
-2548%
OVERVALUED
SAURASHCEM
Small
Saurashtra Cement Limited
Cement
match 164
35
35.7
2.3%
-3401%
WATCHLIST
SHREDIGCEM
Small
Shree Digvijay Cement Co.Ltd
Cement
match 163
14
54.5
6.8%
-1537%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Mangalam Cement Limited operates in Cement, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
66Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 49th percentile of the scored universe and 47th percentile within Industrials. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
8 docs text-extracted · 2 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
49th percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 47th pctile, median 68 · Small: 54th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

8 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
65
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
60
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸9 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

7 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 9 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 9 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 13 Jun - Submission of Copy of the Newspaper Advertisements in respect of transfer of equity shares of the company to the Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF) …

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 5 Jun

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.