IP
IndiaPulse

Hindustan Unilever Limited (HINDUNILVR)

Large Cap

FMCG stocks · Large cap · NSE

Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) is a leading Indian consumer goods company. It operates across Home Care, Beauty & Wellbeing, Personal Care, and Foods segments. Recent strategic actions include the demerger of its Ice Cream business, acquisition of OZiva, and scaling up Minimalist, alongside significant capex in premium formats.

₹1,973.4
+11.40 · +0.58%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · FMCG P/E 36.0 (n=42)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
61

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
High Trust
85

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bearish
27

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
consistent
87

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -3% YoY · margin compression · Rev +10% YoY · +6% QoQ

Filed 28 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹17,341 Cr+10.1%+6.0%
EBITDA₹3,947 Cr+8.5%+2.9%
Operating margin23.0%+0 bps+0 bps
PAT₹2,680 Cr-3.2%-10.5%
PAT margin15.4%-212 bps-286 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T15:25:18.475Z
Management commentary snapshot

HUL reported a sequential step-up in performance for MQ'26 with 7% Underlying Sales Growth (USG) and 6% Underlying Volume Growth (UVG). EBITDA grew 6% with a 23.7% margin. FY'26 saw 5% USG and 4% UVG, with flat PAT (bei).

HUL demonstrated sequential growth improvement in MQ'26, driven by volume. Strategic initiatives like portfolio rotation, capex in premium formats, and omni-channel execution are progressing. While input cost volatility and subdued mass skin care are noted, management expects FY'27 to be better, supported by strong brands and operational agility.

Current business mix

FY'26 Revenue Contribution by Segment

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 4 reported categories.

Businessmix
Home Care37.0%
Beauty & Wellbeing23.0%
Personal Care15.0%
Foods22.0%
Growth engines

Premiumization Strategy

₹2,000 cr. capex committed towards premium formats; 4X expansion of Masstige & Wellbeing portfolio; double-digit growth in Skin Care market development cells.

Omni-channel Execution

Doubled turnover in Q-commerce in FY'26; 25%+ turnover growth in E-commerce in FY'26; ~2 lakh increase in stores covered in General Trade.

Home Care Segment Strength

Delivered strongest growth in 11 quarters; double-digit, broad-based growth in Fabric Wash; double-digit volume growth in Household Care.

Beauty & Wellbeing Momentum

Strong double-digit growth in Hair Care driven by volume; strong performance in premium skin care.

Capacity and execution

Capex for Premium Formats

₹2,000 cr. capex committed towards premium formats.

Tailwinds

Stable Underlying Demand

MQ'26 operating context noted a stable underlying demand trend.

Supportive Macro-economic Backdrop

MQ'26 operating context highlighted supportive monetary and fiscal policies.

Headwinds

Input Cost Volatility

Escalation in crude and crude-linked derivative costs in MQ'26 and FY'26.

Rupee Depreciation

FY'26 saw Rupee depreciation contributing to business impact of geo-political tension.

Subdued Mass Skin Care

Strong performance in premium skin care was offset by subdued performance in mass skin in Beauty & Wellbeing.

Risk radar

Input Cost Inflation

Supply-led inflation in crude-linked derivatives and crude price escalation pose a risk to margins.

Geo-political Disruption

Heightened geo-political tension can impact business through supply-led inflation and currency depreciation.

Intense Competition

Safe harbour statement mentions risks from intense competition and the pricing environment in the market.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

MQ'26 results highlight recent momentum and the impact of strategic actions, while FY'26 provides a comprehensive view of annual performance and the broader trajectory of the business, which is crucial for a consumer company with seasonal elements.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Underlying Volume Growth (UVG)

MQ'26 UVG at 6%; FY'26 UVG at 4%.

EBITDA Margin

MQ'26 EBITDA as a % of Turnover was 23.7% (-50 bps YoY); FY'26 EBITDA as a % of Turnover was 23.6% (-70 bps YoY).

Distribution Expansion (General Trade)

General Trade direct coverage increased by ~2 lakh stores in FY'26 vs FY'25.

Market Share Gains

Home Care strengthened market leadership, Hair Care strengthened market leadership, ~400 bps share gain in Bodywash, highest ever market share in Laundry powders, Closeup gained market shares.

Management forward view

FY'27 Outlook

Management expects FY'27 to be better than FY'26, led by portfolio and channel transformation.

Growth Focus

Focus is on driving competitive, volume-led revenue growth anchored to four key priorities.

Margin Management

Judicious balancing of pricing, savings, and media investments to neutralize short-term impacts from the Middle East situation.

EBITDA Margin Guidance

Consolidated EBITDA margin is expected to be around the current guided range.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Underlying Volume Growth (UVG)MQ'26 UVG at 6%Sustained high-single digit UVG, indicating successful volume-led growth strategy.
EBITDA MarginMQ'26 EBITDA margin at 23.7%Stability around the current guided range, despite input cost pressures and reinvestments.
Premiumization Success₹2,000 cr. capex committed to premium formatsTangible market share gains and accelerated growth in premium and masstige segments.
Omni-channel PerformanceDoubled Q-commerce turnover in FY'26Continued strong turnover growth and expanded reach in Q-commerce, E-commerce, and General Trade.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

27Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -4.4% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 40
Sector 3M: -3.3% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

HINDUNILVRdaily · 1Y · AUTO-12.5%
Latest close ₹1973.40 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.3%
RSI
37
MACD hist
-3.09
52W pos
3%
2026-09-04O ₹1967.00H ₹1984.20L ₹1950.40C ₹1973.40Vol 22.5L sh
₹1.93k₹2.05k₹2.18k₹2.31k₹2.43k52L1973.402026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 37.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~4.6% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 37 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

18
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-5.8%
3M return
-7.5%
6M return
-7.7%
1Y return
-23.5%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
-1
Sector rank
#16
Industry rank
#27
Stage evidence
  • Price is 9.2% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -2.1%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 77.11+0.59%
758392101109Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2677
RS vs Nifty 50077

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 61 · UNDERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

61U-SCORE
Premium Compounder

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation8/30
Growth12/25
Quality18/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow5/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
61

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

61/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 31.1%.
  • Quality contributes 18/20 to the score.

Main drags

  • Valuation is weaker at 8/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 12/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 5/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
42.0
PB
9.5
EV/EBITDA
27.8
ROE
31.0%
ROCE
28.4%
FCF Yield
1.6%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+31.1%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
61
Previous: 61
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+31.1%
Previous: +31.1%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
63
63
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
61

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹544.51
-262.4% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
45.0
Growth-justified Value
₹2,864.7
+31.1% MoS
PEG
3.13

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
85High Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

High Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 98th percentile of the scored universe and 93rd percentile within FMCG. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 61.9%.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
172 docs text-extracted · 27 concalls text-extracted
Score band
High Trust

Management behaviour ranks as unusually reliable. Still verify valuation and cycle risk.

Relative rank
98th percentile

overall median 67 · FMCG: 93rd pctile, median 78 · Large: 94th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

172 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

High Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
82
strong · capital discipline
Results
87
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 61.9%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 1.6%.
  • 12 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • No major Trust Lite risk flags.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
42.00
P/B
9.53
EV/EBITDA
27.84
Market Cap
463668.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
31.00%
ROCE
28.40%
ROA
18.78%
Dividend Y
2.08%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
7.00%
EPS 5Y
13.00%
Revenue 3Y
2.00%
EPS 3Y
14.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.03
Interest Coverage
42.28×
Altman Z
8.54
Book Value
207.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
1.58%
FCF Positive Y
12/5
OCF
10999.00 Cr
EPS TTM
63.66

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
61.90%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
4%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in FMCG, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.