IP
IndiaPulse

Gillette India Limited (GILLETTE)

Large Cap

FMCG stocks · Large cap · NSE

Gillette India Limited manufactures and markets grooming products, including traditional and electric shaving, and female grooming. It also offers oral care products, encompassing both power and manual solutions. The company focuses on product superiority, packaging, communication, and retail execution to drive consumer choice.

₹7,312.5
-28.50 · -0.39%
Quote04 Sept, 03:58 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · FMCG P/E 36.0 (n=42)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
69

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
High Trust
88

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bearish
27

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
consistent
87

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 22/100

margin compression · Rev +11% YoY · PAT +9% YoY

Filed 30 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹783 Cr+10.8%-1.1%
EBITDA₹228 Cr+8.6%-17.7%
Operating margin29.0%-100 bps-600 bps
PAT₹159 Cr+8.9%-17.6%
PAT margin20.3%-34 bps-406 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-22T07:22:40.889Z
Management commentary snapshot

Gillette India reports strong FY25-26 results with 8% sales growth and 23% PAT growth, driven by consistent performance despite soft consumption trends.

The company delivered robust financial performance in FY25-26, with double-digit PAT growth, despite a challenging external landscape marked by soft rural and urban consumption. The integrated growth strategy, focusing on superiority, portfolio, disruption, and productivity, appears to be yielding results. However, external headwinds persist.

Growth engines

Superiority to Win with Consumers

Strategy focuses on product, packaging, communication, and retail execution to deliver consumer and customer value.

Portfolio Performance

Driving brand choice across Grooming (shaving, electric, female) and Oral Care (power, manual) segments.

Constructive Disruption

Implementing AI-led automated on-shelf availability assessment, smart assortment, and agile supply chain optimization.

Productivity to Fuel Investments

Integrated strategy to deliver same or better output with lower spending across materials, manufacturing, ad spend, working capital, and overhead.

Tailwinds

Stable Economic Indicators

India shows stable economic indicators and investment by government, outpacing global GDP growth.

Headwinds

External Landscape Changes

The company faces challenges from inflation, media fragmentation, and changes in the retail landscape.

Soft Consumption Trends

Consumption continues to be soft in both rural and urban markets.

Global Trade Policy & Macro Factors

Evolving global trade policy and macroeconomic factors can impact international businesses.

Risk radar

Soft Consumption Demand

Consumption continues to be soft in both Rural and Urban areas, posing a risk to volume growth.

Inflationary Pressures

While core inflation is muted, energy inflation is a factor to watch, potentially impacting input costs.

Evolving Retail Landscape

Changes in the retail landscape present challenges for execution and distribution.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare YOY

The company changed its fiscal year, making direct QoQ or previous 9-month YoY comparisons non-comparable. Results are indexed versus a comparable 12-month period in the prior year (April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025).

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Sales Growth (FY25-26)

Sales increased by +8% for FY 2025-26, indexed versus the comparable 12-month period in the last year.

PAT Growth (FY25-26)

Profit After Tax (PAT) grew by +23% for FY 2025-26, indexed versus the comparable 12-month period in the last year.

Productivity Savings

INR 38 crores productivity savings were delivered for FY 25/26, integrated into the strategy across materials, manufacturing, ad spend, working capital, and overhead.

Consumption Trends

Consumption continues to be soft in both Rural and Urban markets.

Management forward view

Integrated Growth Strategy

Management is focused on an integrated growth strategy built on superiority, portfolio performance, constructive disruption, productivity, and an empowered organization.

Employee Wellbeing & Value

Prioritizing employee wellbeing and delivering a superior employee value equation is a focus area.

Social Impact

The company aims to improve learning outcomes, impacting over 1 crore children through P&G Shiksha efforts.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Rural and Urban ConsumptionSoftSigns of improvement in demand trends across both segments.
Energy InflationMuted core inflation, but energy inflation is a watch point.Any significant escalation in energy costs that could impact margins.
Productivity SavingsINR 38 crores for FY25/26Continued delivery of productivity savings to fuel investments and protect margins.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

27Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -4.1% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 40
Sector 3M: -3.3% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

GILLETTEdaily · 1Y · AUTO-10.6%
Latest close ₹7312.50 on 2026-09-04
Bar
-0.4%
RSI
33
MACD hist
-6.71
52W pos
3%
2026-09-04O ₹7340.00H ₹7371.00L ₹7300.00C ₹7312.50Vol 9,291 sh
₹7.14k₹7.48k₹7.82k₹8.16k₹8.49k52L7312.502026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 33. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~4.3% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 33 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

16
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-4.8%
3M return
-4.5%
6M return
-8.5%
1Y return
-26.2%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
+1
Sector rank
#16
Industry rank
#27
Stage evidence
  • Price is 6.8% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -1.3%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 68.25-0.38%
66758493102Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2668
RS vs Nifty 50068

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 69 · UNDERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

69U-SCORE
Premium Compounder

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation5/30
Growth18/25
Quality20/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
69

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

69/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 20.7%.
  • Quality contributes 20/20 to the score.

Main drags

  • Valuation is weaker at 5/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 18/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 12/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
35.7
PB
25.2
EV/EBITDA
23.0
ROE
66.5%
ROCE
90.7%
FCF Yield
2.5%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+20.7%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
69
Previous: 69
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+20.7%
Previous: +20.7%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
74
74
68
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹1,156.61
-532.2% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
45.0
Growth-justified Value
₹9,225.9
+20.7% MoS
PEG
1.36

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
88High Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

High Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 100th percentile of the scored universe and 100th percentile within FMCG. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 75%.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
25 docs text-extracted · 7 concalls text-extracted
Score band
High Trust

Management behaviour ranks as unusually reliable. Still verify valuation and cycle risk.

Relative rank
100th percentile

overall median 67 · FMCG: 100th pctile, median 78 · Large: 100th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

25 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

High Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
98
strong · capital discipline
Results
87
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 75%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 2.4%.
  • 12 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • No major Trust Lite risk flags.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
35.70
P/B
25.21
EV/EBITDA
22.98
Market Cap
23831.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
66.50%
ROCE
90.70%
ROA
35.70%
Dividend Y
2.46%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
13.00%
EPS 5Y
23.00%
Revenue 3Y
11.00%
EPS 3Y
31.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
80.08×
Altman Z
10.21
Book Value
290.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
2.48%
FCF Positive Y
12/5
OCF
607.00 Cr
EPS TTM
205.02

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
75.00%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
4%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in FMCG, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.