IP
IndiaPulse

Emami Limited (EMAMILTD)

Large Cap

FMCG stocks · Large cap · NSE

Emami Ltd, founded in 1974, is one of India’s leading FMCG companies manufacturing and marketing personal care and healthcare products. It has a portfolio of over 550 products, including Navratna, BoroPlus, Zandu Balm, and Kesh King. The company has expanded through strategic acquisitions and investments in new-age FMCG segments.

₹366.05
-2.15 · -0.58%
Quote04 Sept, 03:57 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · FMCG P/E 36.0 (n=42)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
62

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
74

medium confidence · 4/4 claims checked

Technical
Bearish
27

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
34

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -15% YoY · margin compression · Rev +15% YoY · +12% QoQ

Filed 04 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹1,039 Cr+14.9%+12.3%
EBITDA₹225 Cr+6.1%+21.0%
Operating margin22.0%-100 bps+200 bps
PAT₹139 Cr-15.2%-2.8%
PAT margin13.4%-476 bps-208 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-12T08:37:43.047Z
Management commentary snapshot

Emami reported a 4% consolidated revenue decline and 15% EBITDA drop in Q4FY26, impacted by a disrupted summer season and geopolitical issues in West Asia. However, the non-summer domestic portfolio showed healthy 11% growth, and gross margins expanded by 250 bps.

Consolidated revenue and EBITDA declined in Q4FY26 and FY26 due to temporary external headwinds like unfavorable summer and West Asia conflict. Management believes these are passing, with core domestic non-summer portfolio showing resilience. Gross margin expansion is positive, but overall performance is under pressure.

Current business mix

FY26 Revenue Contribution

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.

Businessmix
International Business18.0%
Domestic Business82.0%
Growth engines

Non-summer Domestic Portfolio

Non-summer domestic portfolio delivered healthy growth of 11% (volume growth +7%) in Q4FY26, demonstrating resilience.

Organised & New Age Channels

Organised channels increased salience to ~32% of domestic business in FY26 (vs 12% in FY20), with Quick Commerce and GT Marts growing rapidly.

Strategic Investments in New-Age FMCG

Increased stake in Axiom Ayurveda (AloFrut) and acquiring majority stake in IncNut (Vedix, SkinKraft) to strengthen future growth portfolio.

The Man Company & Brillare

These brands delivered +34% growth in Q4FY26 and +20% in FY26, contributing to D2C brands' 9% share of domestic business.

Tailwinds

Resilience of Core Domestic Business

The non-summer domestic portfolio delivered healthy 11% growth in Q4FY26, demonstrating underlying business strength.

Gross Margin Expansion

Gross Margins improved to 68.4% in Q4FY26 (+250 bps) due to disciplined cost management, calibrated pricing, and operational efficiencies.

Early Q1FY27 Trends

Management is encouraged by early trends in Q1FY27, particularly across the summer portfolio, supported by expanded distribution.

Headwinds

Unfavorable Seasonal Conditions

Q4FY26 was impacted by unfavourable seasonal conditions affecting the summer portfolio, leading to a -22% decline.

Geopolitical Disruptions in West Asia

International business revenues declined by 5% in Q4FY26 due to West Asia conflict impacting shipping routes, supply chains, and freight costs.

Input Cost Pressures

Despite input cost pressures during the quarter, the Company improved its Gross Margins.

Risk radar

Geopolitical Instability

West Asia conflict impacted international business, supply chains, and increased freight costs, with normalization dependent on stabilization.

Seasonal Volatility

Unfavorable seasonal conditions significantly impacted the summer portfolio (-22% in Q4FY26), highlighting dependence on weather patterns.

Competition in New-Age Segments

Entry into fast-growing healthy beverage and personalized BPC segments through acquisitions implies exposure to competitive new-age markets.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Nov 2025
Analyst reading lens
Compare YOY

The document provides Q4FY26 and full FY26 results, comparing them directly to Q4FY25 and FY25 respectively. This is appropriate for a seasonal business like FMCG, where quarterly performance is best understood against the same period in the prior year.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Consolidated Revenue Growth (Q4FY26)

Consolidated revenues declined by 4% to ₹925 crore during Q4FY26.

Domestic Net Sales ex-Summer Growth (Q4FY26)

Domestic Net Sales ex-Summer grew +11% (Volume Growth: +7%) in Q4FY26.

International Business Growth (Q4FY26)

International business revenues declined by 5% in Q4FY26 due to geopolitical disruptions in the West Asia region.

Gross Margin (Q4FY26)

Gross Margins improved to 68.4% in Q4FY26, an expansion of 250 basis points.

Management forward view

Temporary Nature of Headwinds

Mr. Harsha V Agarwal stated, 'While these factors affected near-term performance, we believe they represent a passing phase rather than a structural concern'.

Expected Business Momentum Improvement

Mr. Harsha V Agarwal expects 'business momentum to improve from next quarter itself'.

Focus on Long-Term Growth

Mr. Harsha V Agarwal emphasized 'continued investments behind its core brands and strategic expansion into high-growth new-age FMCG segments'.

Confidence in Sustained Profitable Growth

Mr. Mohan Goenka stated, 'We remain confident in the strength of our brands and our ability to deliver sustained profitable growth'.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Summer Portfolio Performance-22% growth in Q4FY26Improvement in Q1FY27, as management expects momentum to pick up.
International Business Growth-5% decline in Q4FY26Stabilization of geopolitical situation in West Asia and subsequent recovery in international revenues.
Contribution of Organised & New Age Channels32% of domestic business in FY26Continued increase in salience, especially from Quick Commerce and GT Marts, and D2C brands.
Performance of New Acquisitions (Axiom, IncNut)Strategic investments made in Q1FY27Integration progress and contribution to overall growth and portfolio transformation in FY27.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Show extracted source claims
revenue outlookpartially deliveredquantified

The 4% GST-driven destocking from Q2 is very confident to be fully recovered in Q3.

Timeframe: Q3 (FY26)Direction: recoveryConfidence: very confident

"we are very confident that it will be recovered in Q3."

Outcome check: Revenue YoY averaged 2.9% across 2 later quarter(s).

revenue outlookpartially deliveredquantified

The company is very confident of seeing better results in Q3, expecting close to double-digit or definitely high single-digit growth.

Timeframe: Q3 (FY26)Direction: growthConfidence: very confident

"definitely high single digits is 100% on the cards."

Outcome check: Revenue YoY averaged 2.9% across 2 later quarter(s).

revenue outlookpartially deliveredquantified

The strategic investments business is expected to grow at a strong double-digit rate in the second half, higher than the first half.

Timeframe: second half (FY26)Direction: growthConfidence: expect

"we expect the business to grow at even a higher rate than the first half, strong double digit."

Outcome check: Revenue YoY averaged 2.9% across 2 later quarter(s).

revenue outlookdelivered

The company remains optimistic about a robust and profitable second half, supported by favorable winter, normalized trade post-GST, and strategic interventions.

Timeframe: second half (FY26)Direction: robust, profitableConfidence: optimistic

"We remain optimistic about a robust and profitable second half"

Outcome check: PAT YoY averaged 1.3% across 2 later quarter(s).

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

27Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -3.9% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 40
Sector 3M: -3.3% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

EMAMILTDdaily · 1Y · AUTO-22.4%
Latest close ₹366.05 on 2026-09-04
Bar
-1.1%
RSI
34
MACD hist
-3.47
52W pos
2%
2026-09-04O ₹370.00H ₹371.40L ₹361.85C ₹366.05Vol 12.9L sh
₹354.42₹391.44₹428.47₹465.49₹502.5252L366.052026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 34.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~4.1% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 34 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

6
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-11.3%
3M return
-6.4%
6M return
-14.5%
1Y return
-39.3%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
-3
Sector rank
#16
Industry rank
#27
Stage evidence
  • Price is 13.2% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.2%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 61.57-0.58%
58718396108Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2662
RS vs Nifty 50062

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 62 · UNDERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

62U-SCORE
Financial Turnaround

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation12/30
Growth10/25
Quality16/20
Balance Sheet11/15
Cash Flow7/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
62

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

62/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 3.9%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 51.5%.

Main drags

  • Valuation is weaker at 12/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 10/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 7/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
21.1
PB
5.5
EV/EBITDA
14.1
ROE
26.2%
ROCE
28.1%
FCF Yield
3.9%
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
+51.5%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
62
Previous: 62
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+51.5%
Previous: +51.5%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
68
68
62
62
62
62
62
62
62
62
62
62

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹160.79
-127.7% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
44.0
Growth-justified Value
₹754.26
+51.5% MoS
PEG
2.45

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
74Healthy Trust · medium confidenceClaim-tested Trust

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Management has 100% delivered/partly-delivered outcomes on 4 checked claims. It ranks around the 75th percentile of the scored universe and 32nd percentile within FMCG. Main check: results consistency is weak at 34/100.

Healthy Trust: 4/4 extracted management claims have outcome checks; 25% were fully delivered and 3 were partially delivered.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
59 extracted concalls · 4/4 claims matched
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
75th percentile

overall median 67 · FMCG: 32nd pctile, median 78 · Large: 56th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Early sample

4/4 claims checked. Use as directional, not final.

Claim delivery
100% delivered or partly delivered

4/4 claims checked · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · medium confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using management claims matched with later outcomes.
Confidence
Useful directional evidence exists, but still verify the latest filings.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
72
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
34
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 3.9%.
  • 11 years of positive FCF.
  • Debt/equity is 0.06.

Trust risks

  • ROCE trend is -2.6%.
  • 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
  • 1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
21.10
P/B
5.46
EV/EBITDA
14.06
Market Cap
15978.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
26.20%
ROCE
28.10%
ROA
19.58%
Dividend Y
2.73%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
6.00%
EPS 5Y
11.00%
Revenue 3Y
4.00%
EPS 3Y
5.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.06
Interest Coverage
69.43×
Altman Z
9.19
Book Value
67.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
3.92%
FCF Positive Y
11/5
OCF
801.00 Cr
EPS TTM
17.15

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
54.84%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
2%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in FMCG, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.