IP
IndiaPulse

EID Parry India Limited (EIDPARRY)

Large Cap

FMCG stocks · Large cap · NSE

EID Parry is a diversified Indian company with interests in Sugar & Biofuels, Nutraceuticals, and Consumer Products. It operates sugar plants and distilleries across South Indian states, focusing on operational efficiency and portfolio reshaping for long-term value creation.

₹781.35
+3.10 · +0.40%
Quote04 Sept, 03:58 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · FMCG P/E 36.0 (n=42)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
WATCHLIST
33

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
68

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
44

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
61

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -33% YoY · margin compression · Rev +3% YoY · +14% QoQ

Filed 12 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹9,018 Cr+3.4%+14.4%
EBITDA₹751 Cr-6.7%+22.9%
Operating margin8.0%-100 bps+0 bps
PAT₹312 Cr-32.8%NDF
PAT margin3.5%-186 bps+710 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-03T17:23:28.146Z
Management commentary snapshot

FY26 results show a challenging year with consolidated revenue from operations at INR 7,055 Cr (down 6.2% YoY) and a PBT loss of INR 216 Cr (vs loss of INR 74 Cr YoY), impacted by significant exceptional items and underperforming segments.

Management acknowledges a challenging year, undertaking portfolio reshaping and exiting a business. Consolidated losses increased significantly due to exceptional items and underperforming segments like Consumer Products and Distillery. A strategic reset is underway, but execution and turnaround in loss-making segments are critical.

Growth engines

Consumer Products Portfolio Premiumization

Transition to value-added, brand-led portfolio (jaggery & other sweeteners) and de-focus from lower-contribution bulk categories like rice and pulses.

Nutraceuticals Market Expansion & New Products

Regaining share in key EU and US markets, expanding in emerging markets, and progressing entry into new product segments around Derma/Hair Health.

Sugar & Biofuels Revenue Maximization

Maximising revenue streams across sugar, co-generation, and distillery segments through operational efficiencies and cost reduction.

Capacity and execution

New Jaggery Facility

Investment in a new state-of-the-art Jaggery facility in Karnataka is underway, expected to be commissioned by the end of FY27 Q3.

Tailwinds

Domestic Sugar Pricing Outlook

Projected lower cane output and closing stock in SY26E are expected to lead to a Neutral/Positive pricing outlook.

Branded Sugar Market Growth

Branded white sugar market in India expected to grow at ~8-9% p.a. to ~INR 8,000 Cr by 2030, driven by increased branded penetration.

Niche Sweeteners Adoption

Non-sugar/Jaggery-based sweeteners constitute ~2% of the market but are driving growth at ~30%.

Headwinds

Sugar & Biofuels Cost Pressures

Increasing cost pressures, unfavorable economics in the Ethanol segment, and a dull market for Sugar exports.

Distillery Segment Profitability

Loss due to increase in feed stock cost and reduction in selling price.

Consumer Products Performance

Increase in loss due to lower sales volume, higher input costs, and channel corrections.

Risk radar

Geopolitical and Policy Uncertainty

Management highlights the need to navigate an uncertain geopolitical and policy environment.

Portfolio Realignment Challenges

Decision to exit Parry Sugars & Refinery business due to operational challenges, structural unviability, and high debt.

Underperforming Bulk Categories

Initial foray into lower-contribution bulk categories such as rice and pulses did not meet expectations.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is essential for understanding full-year performance and the impact of seasonality in the sugar business. QoQ provides insight into recent momentum and the immediate effects of strategic resets in Consumer Products and Nutraceuticals.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Sugar Revenue (FY26)

INR 5,366 Cr (vs INR 5,781 Cr FY25)

Sugar PBT (FY26)

INR 54 Cr (vs loss of INR 115 Cr FY25)

Distillery PBT (FY26)

Loss of INR 14 Cr (vs profit of INR 37 Cr FY25)

Nutraceuticals PBT (FY26)

INR 19 Cr (vs INR 3 Cr FY25)

Management forward view

FY27 Priorities: 'Disciplined Renewal'

Focus on strengthening the core, driving margin improvement, stronger working capital/cash flow management, and accelerating digital/AI-led transformation.

Consumer Products Strategic Reset

FY25-26 marked a year of strategic reset and sharper prioritization, recalibrating away from lower-contribution bulk categories towards value-added segments.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Sugar Segment PBTINR 54 Cr (FY26)Sustained profitability improvement and positive impact from operational efficiencies.
Distillery Segment PBTLoss of INR 14 Cr (FY26)Reversal of losses, indicating better management of feedstock costs and selling prices.
Consumer Products PBTLoss of INR 109 Cr (FY26)Margin expansion and improved profitability from portfolio premiumization and channel strategies.
New Jaggery Facility CommissioningExpected by end of FY27 Q3Timely completion and successful ramp-up of the new facility in Karnataka.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

44Neutral

SMA20 +2.1% / mo · MACD −

Stock trend: 47
Sector RS: 40
Sector 3M: -3.3% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

EIDPARRYdaily · 1Y · AUTO-6.3%
Latest close ₹781.35 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.4%
RSI
47
MACD hist
-3.35
52W pos
20%
2026-09-04O ₹778.25H ₹784.50L ₹774.85C ₹781.35Vol 2.7L sh
₹686.89₹749.09₹811.29₹873.49₹935.6852L781.352026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 47.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 rising (~2.0% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 47 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 30% off 52W high · 12% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

20
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-2.9%
3M return
+6.2%
6M return
-3.6%
1Y return
-28.2%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
+8
Sector rank
#16
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is 2.3% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -1.9%.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 64.9+0.40%
57687991102Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2665
RS vs Nifty 50065

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 33 · WATCHLIST · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

33U-SCORE
WATCHLIST

Fundamental score breakdown

WATCHLIST
Valuation7/30
Growth7/25
Quality1/20
Balance Sheet8/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
33

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

33/100 · WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Balance sheet contributes 8/15 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -82.3%.
  • Quality is weaker at 1/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 7/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
17.1
PB
1.6
EV/EBITDA
4.1
ROE
7.8%
ROCE
17.0%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.4
MoS
-82.3%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
33
Previous: 33
Verdict
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
-82.3%
Previous: -82.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +1 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
35
35
33
33
33
33
33
33
32
32
32
33

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹538.37
-45.1% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
16.4
Growth-justified Value
₹428.53
-82.3% MoS
PEG
2.44

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
68Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 56th percentile of the scored universe and 14th percentile within FMCG. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 52/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: 2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
66 docs text-extracted · 36 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
56th percentile

overall median 67 · FMCG: 14th pctile, median 78 · Large: 32nd pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

66 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
81
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
52
watch · capital discipline
Results
61
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 4 years of positive FCF.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • OPM spread across recent quarters is 2%.

Trust risks

  • 2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ROE is low at 7.9%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
17.10
P/B
1.58
EV/EBITDA
4.13
Market Cap
13905.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
7.85%
ROCE
17.00%
ROA
4.20%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
16.00%
EPS 5Y
7.00%
Revenue 3Y
3.00%
EPS 3Y
-11.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.40
Interest Coverage
7.30×
Altman Z
2.65
Book Value
493.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
4/5
OCF
1542.00 Cr
EPS TTM
26.13

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
41.28%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
19%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in FMCG, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.