IP
IndiaPulse

All E Technologies Ltd. (ALLETEC)

SME Cap

IT stocks · SME cap · NSE

All E Technologies Ltd. (ALLETEC) is an Indian IT services company specializing in Microsoft AI Cloud Partner Program solutions. It provides digital transformation, data & AI, enterprise applications (ERP/CRM), and cloud infrastructure services across diverse geographies and industries, focusing on Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Power Platform.

₹137.25
+4.00 · +3.00%
Quote04 Sept, 03:52 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · IT P/E 22.6 (n=200)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Strong fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Candidate for deeper work
Valuation is strong. Wait for stronger Trust evidence before treating this as high conviction.
Good U-Score but weak results consistency: verify latest quarters.
U-Score
DEEP VALUE
75

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
70

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
47

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
22

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -20% YoY · margin compression · Rev +9% YoY · +7% QoQ

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹37.2 Cr+9.1%+7.0%
EBITDA₹4.7 Cr-28.8%+9.7%
Operating margin12.5%-666 bps+31 bps
PAT₹5.1 Cr-19.9%-13.5%
PAT margin13.6%-494 bps-322 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-19T14:54:06.204Z
Management commentary snapshot

ALLETEC reported a soft FY'26 with revenue and profit dips, attributed by management to a cautious demand cycle and strategic investments in business development and AI capabilities. Q4 FY'26 also saw sequential and YoY declines in key financial metrics.

The thesis is under stress due to the reported decline in revenue and profits for FY'26 and Q4, reflecting a challenging demand environment. Management frames this as a deliberate investment year to build scale and AI capabilities, with fundamentals remaining intact. The ability to convert these investments into future growth is key.

Current business mix

Revenue by Industry (FY'26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 10 reported categories.

Businessmix
Professional Services35.0%
Manufacturing16.0%
Green Energy & EPC10.0%
Retail9.0%
Food & Beverages7.0%
Financial Services7.0%
Digital Native4.0%
Trade & Distribution4.0%
Education4.0%
Travel4.0%
Growth engines

Move up-market

null

Enhanced focus on larger accounts that bring higher revenue, last several years, and expand over time.

Strengthen Data & AI solutions

null

Building capability for solutions customers are now actively seeking, leveraging Microsoft Fabric-based analytics modernization.

Proprietary IP

null

Developing differentiated, stickier offerings that set the company apart in larger deals.

International expansion

null

Extend the Middle East and APAC momentum through local presence.

Tailwinds

Microsoft Partner Credentials

null

Attained all six Microsoft Solutions Partner designations, signaling validated capability across the entire Microsoft Cloud stack.

Strong Balance Sheet

null

~₹163 Cr cash & investments, effectively debt-free, providing strategic flexibility for future growth.

High Customer Retention

null

Sustained high repeat + recurring revenue (90.6% in FY'26) indicates strong customer relationships and stickiness.

Geographic Traction

null

Strengthening market position in Americas and expanding in Middle East & Africa, with steady growth in India.

Headwinds

Cautious Demand Environment

null

Mid-market customers across several regions became cautious and deferred new commitments amid global uncertainty.

Technology Change Uncertainty

null

An unprecedented pace of technology change left customers unsure they were investing in the right solutions, lengthening decision cycles.

Increased Pre-sales Costs

null

High AI interest requires more pre-sales and sales effort per deal as value is still being defined for customers.

Macroeconomic Factors

null

Shifting global trade dynamics and geopolitical conflicts contributed to market stress, impacting customer spending.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

Both YoY and QoQ comparisons are relevant. YoY provides insight into the full impact of the 'transitional year' and cautious demand cycle. QoQ highlights recent sequential momentum, which is important for IT services given the project-based nature and potential for quick shifts in demand.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Total Revenue (FY'26)

null

INR 1,378.7 Mn (vs FY'25: 1,399.7 Mn)

Reported Net Profit (FY'26)

null

INR 257.2 Mn (vs FY'25: 301.5 Mn)

PAT Margin (FY'26)

null

17.2% (vs FY'25: 19.6%)

Repeat + Recurring Revenue (FY'26)

null

90.6%

Management forward view

Investment Year

null

FY'26 was a deliberate investment year in business development and AI capabilities through a cautious demand cycle.

Fundamentals Intact

null

Management asserts that the profitable, debt-free, cash-rich business fundamentals are intact and strengthening.

Mid-term Revenue Goal

null

A ₹500 Cr revenue target is a mid-term goal, not guidance, requiring both organic and inorganic growth.

Capital Allocation Priorities

null

Priorities include maintaining strategic flexibility, pursuing value-accretive acquisitions, and continuing capability investments.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Revenue GrowthFY'26 revenue declined YoY.Reversal of revenue decline and acceleration from new investments in BD and AI capabilities.
PAT MarginFY'26 PAT margin at 17.2%, Q4 at 15.6%.Stabilization and improvement in profitability as strategic investments yield results.
Customer Additions35 customers added in FY'26, 8 in Q4.Acceleration in new customer acquisition, particularly in larger accounts as the company moves up-market.
Cash & Investments~₹163 Cr cash & investments.Disciplined deployment of cash in value-accretive M&A and capability expansion, as per stated capital allocation strategy.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

47Neutral

SMA20 -7.3% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low

Stock trend: 40
Sector RS: 57
Sector 3M: +0.1% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

ALLETECdaily · 1Y · AUTO-8.3%
Latest close ₹137.25 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+1.0%
RSI
59
MACD hist
1.82
52W pos
12%
2026-09-04O ₹135.90H ₹137.65L ₹135.90C ₹137.25Vol 22,400 sh
₹111.38₹135.71₹160.05₹184.39₹208.7352L137.252026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 59. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 falling (~7.9% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 59 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 54% off 52W high · 19% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 75 · DEEP VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

75U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

DEEP VALUE
Valuation22/30
Growth23/25
Quality12/20
Balance Sheet10/15
Cash Flow5/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
-2
Raw sum
75

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

75/100 · DEEP VALUE

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 66.5%.
  • Growth contributes 23/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 2 points.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 5/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 12/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

IT valuation: PE and EV/EBITDA against growth and margins

Asset-light IT companies deserve valuation support only when growth, margins, and cash conversion hold up.

IT PE/EVEBITDA
Primary lens
PE and EV/EBITDA relative to revenue growth, margins, and cash conversion.
Secondary checks
Deal pipeline, attrition, dollar revenue growth, FCF yield.
Main risk check
Low PE can reflect weak growth or margin pressure.
PE
10.9
PB
1.6
EV/EBITDA
11.6
ROE
17.1%
ROCE
22.2%
FCF Yield
1.8%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+66.5%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
75
Previous: 75
Verdict
DEEP VALUE
Previous: DEEP VALUE
Margin of safety
+66.5%
Previous: +66.5%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -5 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
76
76
75
75
75
76
77
78
79
80
80
75

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹150.99
+9.1% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
33.8
Growth-justified Value
₹410.02
+66.5% MoS
PEG
0.39

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
70Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 63rd percentile of the scored universe and 58th percentile within IT. Main check: results consistency is weak at 22/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: ROCE trend is -3.1%.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
38 docs text-extracted · 18 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
63rd percentile

overall median 67 · IT: 58th pctile, median 69 · SME: 81st pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

38 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
88
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
72
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
22
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 1.8%.
  • 5 years of positive FCF.
  • Debt/equity is 0.01.

Trust risks

  • ROCE trend is -3.1%.
  • 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
  • 1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
10.90
P/B
1.64
EV/EBITDA
11.58
Market Cap
277.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
17.10%
ROCE
22.20%
ROA
11.43%
Dividend Y
1.09%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
18.00%
EPS 5Y
25.00%
Revenue 3Y
16.00%
EPS 3Y
32.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.01
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
6.37
Book Value
83.60

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
1.81%
FCF Positive Y
5/5
OCF
17.00 Cr
EPS TTM
12.12

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
50.10%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
12%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 138-1.4% vs prev
0140.0Mar 2020: 54.0Mar 2021: 61.0Mar 2022: 70.0Mar 2023: 88.0Mar 2024: 116Mar 2025: 140Mar 2026: 138FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 26.0-13.3% vs prev
030.0Mar 2020: 2.0Mar 2021: 10.0Mar 2022: 8.0Mar 2023: 12.0Mar 2024: 20.0Mar 2025: 30.0Mar 2026: 26.0FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 15.4-26.2% vs prev
025.6Mar 2020: 6.5%Mar 2021: 25.6%Mar 2022: 18.2%Mar 2023: 12.0%Mar 2024: 16.8%Mar 2025: 20.8%Mar 2026: 15.4%FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Peers

Business-comparable names in IT, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.