Systango Technologies Ltd. (SYSTANGO)
SME CapIT stocks · SME cap · NSE
Systango Technologies Ltd. operates in Software Services, within the IT sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Strong fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Good · 67/100Rev +50% YoY · PAT +56% YoY · operating leverage · margin compression
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹45 Cr | +50.0% | +0.0% |
| EBITDA | ₹15 Cr | +7.1% | -21.1% |
| Operating margin | 33.0% | -500 bps | -900 bps |
| PAT | ₹14 Cr | +55.6% | -22.2% |
| PAT margin | 31.1% | -573 bps | -889 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Issuer presentation review pending
Systango Technologies Ltd. operates in Software Services, within the IT sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Trend score and candlestick chart
53NeutralMACD + · near 52W low
Technical chart
SYSTANGOdaily · 1Y · AUTO-5.9%Daily technical trend read
Mixed signalsSignals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 54. Wait for confirmation.
- Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
- SMA20 roughly flat — short-term momentum stalled.
- RSI(14) at 54 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
- 45% off 52W high · 11% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 81 · DEEP VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 81 · DEEP VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Fundamental score breakdown
DEEP VALUEWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 69.3%.
- Growth contributes 24/25 to the score.
Main drags
- Penalty bucket subtracts 2 points.
- Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Valuation is weaker at 20/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
IT valuation: PE and EV/EBITDA against growth and margins
Asset-light IT companies deserve valuation support only when growth, margins, and cash conversion hold up.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Factor attribution
Modelled fair value
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 97th percentile of the scored universe and 95th percentile within IT. No major sub-score weakness stands out.
High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 72.2%.
Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.
overall median 67 · IT: 95th pctile, median 69 · SME: 99th pctile, median 64
7 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Healthy Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 72.2%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸4 years of positive FCF.
- ▸Debt/equity is 0.00.
Trust risks
- ▸No major Trust Lite risk flags.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 10.40
- P/B
- 2.44
- EV/EBITDA
- 9.43
- Market Cap
- 330.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 26.80%
- ROCE
- 33.00%
- ROA
- 21.33%
- Dividend Y
- 3.11%
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 31.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 42.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 20.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 32.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.00
- Interest Coverage
- —
- Altman Z
- 8.80
- Book Value
- 92.40
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 4/5
- OCF
- 34.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 21.73
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 72.17%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 11%
Financial History
Updated 5/9/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable names in IT, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable names in IT, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable peers in IT — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.