Trident Techlabs Ltd. (TECHLABS)
SME CapIT stocks · SME cap · NSE
Trident Techlabs Ltd. operates in Software Services, within the IT sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Bad · 0/100Rev -47% YoY · PAT -143% YoY · margin compression
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹33.7 Cr | -47.5% | -46.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹-3.9 Cr | -131.2% | -123.3% |
| Operating margin | -11.7% | -3437 bps | -3817 bps |
| PAT | ₹-5.3 Cr | -142.6% | -146.7% |
| PAT margin | -15.7% | -3023 bps | -3366 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Issuer presentation review pending
Trident Techlabs Ltd. operates in Software Services, within the IT sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Trend score and candlestick chart
39Bearishfull bear SMA stack · SMA20 -10.8% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low
Technical chart
TECHLABSdaily · 1Y · AUTO-43.3%Daily technical trend read
Bearish setupTrend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 41.
- Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
- SMA20 falling (~12.1% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 41 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
- 82% off 52W high · 10% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 35 · WATCHLIST · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 35 · WATCHLIST · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Fundamental score breakdown
WATCHLISTWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- FCF yield is supportive at 3.7%.
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Growth contributes 19/25 to the score.
Main drags
- Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
- Valuation is weaker at 2/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Quality is weaker at 2/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
IT valuation: PE and EV/EBITDA against growth and margins
Asset-light IT companies deserve valuation support only when growth, margins, and cash conversion hold up.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -1 points.
Factor attribution
Modelled fair value
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 59th percentile of the scored universe and 54th percentile within IT. Main check: results consistency is weak at 38/100.
Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 68%. Key concern: 1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.
overall median 67 · IT: 54th pctile, median 69 · SME: 77th pctile, median 64
8 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Mixed Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 68%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸FCF yield is positive at 3.7%.
Trust risks
- ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
- ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 47.1%.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 32.80
- P/B
- 3.17
- EV/EBITDA
- 15.55
- Market Cap
- 199.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 10.10%
- ROCE
- 16.40%
- ROA
- 6.07%
- Dividend Y
- 0.87%
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 28.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 104.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 13.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 9.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.36
- Interest Coverage
- 5.07×
- Altman Z
- 5.46
- Book Value
- 36.30
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- 3.73%
- FCF Positive Y
- 3/5
- OCF
- 8.06 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 3.51
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 68.00%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 2%
Financial History
Updated 5/9/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable names in IT, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable names in IT, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable peers in IT — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.