IP
IndiaPulse

Aditya Birla Lifestyle Brands Limited (ABLBL)

Large Cap

Consumer stocks · Large cap · NSE

Aditya Birla Lifestyle Brands Limited (ABLBL) operates in the lifestyle and fashion segment, managing a portfolio of brands across various channels including retail, wholesale, and e-commerce, with a focus on both established lifestyle brands and emerging businesses.

₹86.07
+2.58 · +3.09%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 23.3 (n=433)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
WATCHLIST
41

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
69

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bearish
34

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
consistent
95

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Good · 70/100

Rev +11% YoY · PAT +21% YoY · margin expansion · operating leverage

Filed 01 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹2,046 Cr+11.1%-5.9%
EBITDA₹308 Cr+17.1%-12.5%
Operating margin15.0%+100 bps-100 bps
PAT₹29 Cr+20.8%-47.3%
PAT margin1.4%+12 bps-111 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T15:57:25.160Z
Management commentary snapshot

ABLBL reported strong Q4 FY26 results with 12% revenue growth and 14% EBITDA growth, driven by double-digit performance in both Lifestyle Brands and Emerging Business segments, alongside significant normalized PAT growth of 58%.

The company demonstrated robust performance in Q4 and FY26, with consistent double-digit revenue and EBITDA growth, strong retail LTL, and significant profitability improvements across segments. Strategic expansion and channel momentum support the underlying thesis.

Current business mix

Lifestyle Brands Revenue by Channel (Q4 FY26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 4 reported categories.

Businessmix
Retail63.7%
Wholesale22.1%
E-commerce7.2%
Others7.0%
Growth engines

Multi-channel Performance

Revenue up by 12% led by strong multi-channel performance across brands.

Emerging Business Growth

Emerging business overall revenue up 18% YoY led by strong retail performance.

E-commerce & Wholesale Momentum

Double digit YoY growth across e-com & departmental store business.

Brand Refresh & Presence

Ongoing celebrity and sports led associations reinforcing brand relevance; larger store facades building dominant & impressive brand presence.

Capacity and execution

Overall Store Expansion

Net addition of 33 stores in Q4; 300+ gross store additions in FY26.

Lifestyle Brands Network

Accelerated network expansion with 230+ gross store additions in FY26.

Reebok Store Additions

50+ gross additions in FY26, now available at 210+ stores.

VH Innerwear Counters

Added ~1500 counters in FY26, present across ~38000 trade outlets and 100+ exclusive stores.

Tailwinds

Preference for Versatile Dressing

Growing preference for comfort-led, multi-occasion wear and increasing influence of tech in formal wear.

Tech & AI Adoption

Accelerated adoption of Tech and AI, integrating intelligence across operations and value chain, with hyperlocal fulfilment as a key focus.

Headwinds

Geopolitical Factors

Geopolitical factors at play causing some disruptions towards the end of Q4.

Uneven Wedding Calendar

No wedding dates in Jan, with Feb–Mar dates more clustered vs last year, impacting sales.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare YOY

The investor presentation consistently compares Q4 FY26 to Q4 FY25 and FY26 to FY25, highlighting year-over-year growth rates for all key financial and operational metrics.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Revenue Growth

ABLBL sales for Q4 up 12% vs LY; FY26 overall sales up 7% vs LY.

EBITDA Growth

EBITDA grew 14% vs LY in Q4; FY26 EBITDA grew 13% vs LY.

EBITDA Margin

Overall ABLBL margin at 17.2% in Q4; FY26 margin at 17.0%, up 80 bps YoY.

Normalized PAT Growth

PAT normalized up 58% vs LY in Q4; FY26 PAT normalized up 61% vs LY.

Management forward view

Aggressive Expansion

Management has 'kick started aggressive expansion engine for medium term'.

Demerger & Transition

Seamless demerger and GST transition with limited operational impact.

VH Innerwear Breakeven

VH Innerwear is 'on path to breakeven'.

Hyperlocal Fulfilment Focus

Hyperlocal fulfilment is a key focus for integrating intelligence across operations.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Retail LTL Growth6% (Q4 FY26)Sustained double-digit LTL growth across segments, especially in small towns and emerging businesses.
EBITDA Margin17.2% (Q4 FY26)Continued margin expansion, particularly in the Emerging Business segment.
Store Additions33 net stores (Q4 FY26), 300+ gross stores (FY26)Pace of network expansion and utilization of new stores.
Emerging Business Profitability4.2% EBITDA margin (Q4 FY26)Path to breakeven for VH Innerwear and overall profitability trajectory of emerging brands.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

34Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -8.5% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low

Stock trend: 26
Sector RS: 45
Sector 3M: -2.3% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

ABLBLdaily · 1Y · AUTO-17.3%
Latest close ₹86.07 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+2.2%
RSI
43
MACD hist
0.07
52W pos
5%
2026-09-04O ₹84.18H ₹86.90L ₹83.72C ₹86.07Vol 8.5L sh
₹80.76₹90.92₹101.08₹111.24₹121.4052L86.072026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 43. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~9.3% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 43 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

6
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-8.3%
3M return
-12.8%
6M return
-14.9%
1Y return
-39.5%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
-3
Sector rank
#12
Industry rank
#23
Stage evidence
  • Price is 12.7% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.1%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 62.1+3.09%
57718498112Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2662
RS vs Nifty 50062

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 41 · WATCHLIST · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

41U-SCORE
WATCHLIST

Fundamental score breakdown

WATCHLIST
Valuation2/30
Growth17/25
Quality9/20
Balance Sheet1/15
Cash Flow6/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
41

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

41/100 · WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 9.7%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Growth contributes 17/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -69.8%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 2/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 1/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
49.2
PB
7.4
EV/EBITDA
6.1
ROE
14.9%
ROCE
15.0%
FCF Yield
9.7%
Debt/Equity
2.1
MoS
-69.8%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
41
Previous: 41
Verdict
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
-69.8%
Previous: -69.8%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +1 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
47
47
41
41
41
41
41
40
41
40
40
41

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹19.45
-342.4% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
35.0
Growth-justified Value
₹50.68
-69.8% MoS
PEG
0.69

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
69Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 59th percentile of the scored universe and 64th percentile within Consumer. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 40/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: Debt/equity is 2.14.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
20 docs text-extracted · 8 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
59th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 64th pctile, median 66 · Large: 35th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

20 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
40
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
95
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is 9.7%.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust risks

  • Debt/equity is 2.14.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
49.20
P/B
7.42
EV/EBITDA
6.10
Market Cap
10505.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
14.90%
ROCE
15.00%
ROA
2.02%
Dividend Y
0.58%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
4.81%
EPS 5Y
71.27%
Revenue 3Y
4.81%
EPS 3Y
71.27%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
2.14
Interest Coverage
3.83×
Altman Z
2.46
Book Value
11.60

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
9.72%
FCF Positive Y
2/5
OCF
1219.00 Cr
EPS TTM
1.45

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
46.60%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
6%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Consumer, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.