IP
IndiaPulse

Sapphire Foods India Limited (SAPPHIRE)

Large Cap

Consumer stocks · Large cap · NSE

YUM’s franchisee operator in India, Sri Lanka & Maldives, operating 1052 restaurants (575 KFC, 466 Pizza Hut, 11 Taco Bell) as of March 31, 2026. It is Sri Lanka’s largest international QSR chain.

₹228.43
-0.33 · -0.14%
Quote04 Sept, 03:57 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 23.3 (n=433)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
29

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
60

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
56

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
47

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 45/100

Rev +15% YoY · margin expansion · +13% QoQ

Filed 24 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹891 Cr+14.7%+12.5%
EBITDA₹140 Cr+23.9%+12.9%
Operating margin16.0%+100 bps+0 bps
PAT₹14 CrNDFNDF
PAT margin1.6%+183 bps+321 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-03T18:31:08.129Z
Management commentary snapshot

Q4 FY26 Restaurant Sales grew 11% YoY to ₹7,898 Mn, with EBITDA up 10% to ₹1,249 Mn. However, FY26 EBITDA declined 2% YoY to ₹4,804 Mn, and Pizza Hut India's Restaurant EBITDA turned negative at -3.3% for FY26.

While Q4 FY26 showed some sales and EBITDA growth, the full-year FY26 performance indicates a decline in overall EBITDA and a concerning negative Restaurant EBITDA for Pizza Hut India. KFC's ADSPR also declined, suggesting underlying demand challenges.

Current business mix

Omni Channel Mix (FY26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 3 reported categories.

Businessmix
Delivery44.0%
Take Away23.0%
Dine In33.0%
Growth engines

KFC Expansion

Management aims to continue the current pace of expansion, adding 60-80 KFC stores per year.

Sri Lanka Operations

Restaurant Related Revenue grew 18% YoY in INR for FY26, with 9 net restaurant additions.

Delivery Channel Growth

Revenue from Delivery increased from 21% in FY19 to 44% in Q4FY26, indicating strong channel shift.

KFC Taste Innovations

Launch of global “Saucy” concept in Dunked in Jan’26 and “KFC Shawowrma” innovation to drive customer frequency.

Capacity and execution

Total Restaurants

1052 total restaurants across India, Sri Lanka, and Maldives as of March 31, 2026, with 89 net additions in FY26.

KFC Restaurants

575 KFC restaurants as of March 31, 2026, with 73 net additions in FY26.

Pizza Hut Restaurants

341 Pizza Hut restaurants as of March 31, 2026, with 7 net additions in FY26.

Sri Lanka Restaurants

136 restaurants as of March 31, 2026, with 9 net additions in FY26.

Tailwinds

Cost Optimization Initiatives

Implementation of zero-based cost budgeting and the PACE SETTER program for benchmarking costs among restaurants.

Optimized Restaurant Size

Focus on smaller sized omni-channel restaurants, reducing average size by ~45% for both KFC and Pizza Hut since FY19.

Risk radar

Pizza Hut Profitability Decline

Pizza Hut India's Restaurant EBITDA % turned negative to -3.3% in FY26, a significant drop from 2.4% in FY25.

KFC Average Daily Sales per Restaurant (ADSPR) Decline

KFC India's ADSPR decreased from ₹114k in FY25 to ₹110k in FY26, indicating potential pressure on same-store sales.

Overall EBITDA Margin Contraction

Company-wide EBITDA margin for FY26 declined by 170 bps YoY to 15.4%, despite revenue growth.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare YOY

The presentation provides Q4 FY26 vs Q4 FY25 and FY26 vs FY25 data, making YoY the most relevant comparison for assessing annual performance and quarterly trends against the previous year.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Restaurant Sales Growth

Q4 FY26: +11% YoY to ₹7,898 Mn; FY26: +8% YoY to ₹31,159 Mn.

EBITDA Margin

Q4 FY26: 15.8% (down 20 bps YoY); FY26: 15.4% (down 170 bps YoY).

KFC India Average Daily Sales per Restaurant (ADSPR)

FY26: ₹110k (down from ₹114k in FY25).

KFC India Restaurant EBITDA %

FY26: 16.3% (down 100 bps YoY from 17.3%).

Management forward view

KFC Brand Priorities

Focus on craveable taste innovations, value offerings, frictionless customer experience (digital kiosks), and continued accessibility through expansion.

Pizza Hut Brand Priorities

Emphasis on differentiated Dine-In experience, hot & fresh delivery, competitive value, taste superiority, and mass media advertising.

Proposed Merger

The board of directors of Sapphire Foods & Devyani International approved a merger scheme on January 1, 2026, subject to statutory and regulatory approvals.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Pizza Hut India Restaurant EBITDA %-3.3% (FY26)Signs of improvement towards positive profitability and sustained growth in the segment.
KFC India Average Daily Sales per Restaurant (ADSPR)₹110k (FY26)Stabilization and reversal of the declining trend in ADSPR, indicating healthy demand.
Overall EBITDA Margin15.4% (FY26)Improvement in margins, especially given stated cost optimization initiatives and restaurant size optimization.
Devyani International Merger ApprovalsBoard approved (Jan 1, 2026)Progress on obtaining statutory and regulatory approvals for the proposed merger.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

56Neutral

SMA20 +25.0% / mo · MACD −

Stock trend: 63
Sector RS: 45
Sector 3M: -2.3% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

SAPPHIREdaily · 1Y · AUTO+22.4%
Latest close ₹228.43 on 2026-09-04
Bar
-0.0%
RSI
54
MACD hist
-3.32
52W pos
45%
2026-09-04O ₹228.50H ₹233.99L ₹225.56C ₹228.43Vol 7.1L sh
₹133.97₹166.66₹199.34₹232.03₹264.7252L228.432026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 54. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • Recent golden cross (SMA50 crossed above SMA200).
  • SMA20 rising (~20.0% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 54 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 32% off 52W high · 63% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

50
RS percentile
Stage 2 Uptrend
1M return
+1.9%
3M return
+28.9%
6M return
+34.9%
1Y return
-30.0%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
+22
Sector rank
#12
Industry rank
#23
Stage evidence
  • Price is 20.2% above the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is above the 30-week proxy and its slope is rising +2.3%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are positive.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
Sector
neutral
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 68.71-0.15%
49637790104Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2669
RS vs Nifty 50069

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 29 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

29U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation1/30
Growth13/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet4/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
29

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

29/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 3.7%.
  • Cash flow contributes 8/10 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 13/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -7012.5%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 1/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
2983.0
PB
5.3
EV/EBITDA
9.7
ROE
-1.0%
ROCE
4.0%
FCF Yield
3.7%
Debt/Equity
1.0
MoS
-7012.5%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
29
Previous: 29
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-7012.5%
Previous: -7012.5%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
38
38
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
Growth-justified P/E
41.9
Growth-justified Value
-7012.5% MoS
PEG
229.46

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
60Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 28th percentile of the scored universe and 30th percentile within Consumer. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 28/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: 3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
124 docs text-extracted · 34 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
28th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 30th pctile, median 66 · Large: 17th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

124 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
61
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
28
weak · capital discipline
Results
47
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 3.7%.
  • 6 years of positive FCF.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • 3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • Debt/equity is 1.02.
  • ROCE is low at 4%.
  • ROE is low at -1%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
2983.00
P/B
5.27
EV/EBITDA
9.74
Market Cap
7341.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
-1.03%
ROCE
3.98%
ROA
-0.49%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
25.00%
EPS 5Y
13.00%
Revenue 3Y
11.00%
EPS 3Y
-8.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
1.02
Interest Coverage
4.01×
Altman Z
4.59
Book Value
43.30

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
3.73%
FCF Positive Y
6/5
OCF
507.00 Cr
EPS TTM
-0.50

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
26.06%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
44%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Consumer, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.