Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 1 Sep
Source: Bse
Consumer stocks · Micro cap · NSE
Relaxo Footwears Limited is a leading Indian footwear manufacturer with a diversified brand portfolio including Hawai, Flite, and Sparx. It operates 9 manufacturing facilities with a capacity of ~10.5 lakh pairs/day and a wide distribution network across ~70,000+ retailers, 630 distributors, and 420 EBOs.
full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -14.8% / mo · MACD + · sector -3.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue +7.8% · PAT +12.2% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
margin compression · Rev +8% YoY · PAT +12% YoY
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹705 Cr | +7.8% | -6.1% |
| EBITDA | ₹108 Cr | +9.1% | -12.9% |
| Operating margin | 15.0% | +0 bps | -200 bps |
| PAT | ₹55 Cr | +12.2% | -19.1% |
| PAT margin | 7.8% | +31 bps | -125 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 20/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 38.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 25 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Q4FY26 saw strong sequential and YoY recovery with revenue up 8.05% YoY to 751 Cr and volumes up 11.11% YoY to 5.0 Cr pairs, driving PAT growth of 20.37% YoY to 68 Cr. Full-year FY26 revenue declined 3.13% YoY to 2,702 Cr and volumes declined 1.69% YoY to 17.5 Cr pairs, but PAT improved 5.25% YoY to 179 Cr due to margin expansion.
The company's Q4FY26 performance indicates a strong rebound in volumes and profitability, suggesting effective operational adjustments. While full-year revenue and volume growth remain a concern, the improvement in PAT and margins is positive. The decline in average realization per pair warrants close monitoring for pricing power.
Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 3 reported categories.
Expected to grow at 9.7% CAGR from 2025-2034 to 4,433 Bn.
India's organised footwear market expected to grow at 13% CAGR from 674 Bn (2025) to 1,995 Bn (2034).
Fastest-growing footwear category, projected to expand at ~10% CAGR.
Online shopping, virtual try-ons, and AI-powered personalization are reshaping customer experiences.
Accelerating the shift of India’s footwear market toward the organised sector.
Driving demand and accelerating the shift to the organised sector.
Gaining share, reflecting rising workforce participation and faster fashion cycles.
Average realization per pair declined YoY in both Q4FY26 and for the full year FY26.
FY26 saw a YoY decline in both revenue and number of pairs sold.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
YoY comparison is essential for assessing annual performance and Q4 against the previous year's base. QoQ comparison is critical to gauge sequential momentum and the effectiveness of recent strategies, especially given the significant Q4 recovery from Q3.
Q4FY26 volumes grew 11.11% YoY to 5.0 Cr pairs; FY26 volumes declined 1.69% YoY to 17.5 Cr pairs.
Declined 1.96% YoY in Q4FY26 to 150 and 1.92% YoY for FY26 to 153.
Q4FY26 EBITDA margin was 16.5% (+40 bps YoY, +610 bps QoQ); FY26 EBITDA margin was 13.8% (+10 bps YoY).
~70,000+ Retailers/Multi-Brand Outlets, ~630 Active Pan-India Distributors, 420 Exclusive Brand Outlets.
Continuous focus on optimising operations, including lean manufacturing and yield improvement.
Focus on cost optimisation in manufacturing to enable competitive pricing.
Strong in-house manufacturing capabilities help maintain end-to-end quality.
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| Volume Growth Trend | Q4FY26 volumes up 11.11% YoY; FY26 volumes down 1.69% YoY. | Sustained sequential and YoY volume growth to confirm market demand recovery. |
| Average Realization per Pair | Declined 1.96% YoY in Q4FY26 and 1.92% YoY for FY26. | Stabilization or improvement in pricing to support revenue expansion. |
| EBITDA Margin Performance | Q4FY26 EBITDA margin 16.5% (+40 bps YoY); FY26 EBITDA margin 13.8% (+10 bps YoY). | Continued margin expansion or stability, indicating effective cost management. |
| Organised Market Share | Not explicitly stated, but company operates in a growing organised market. | Company's ability to capture growth and increase its share in the expanding organised footwear sector. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 81st percentile of the scored universe and 84th percentile within Consumer. No major sub-score weakness stands out.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Consumer: 84th pctile, median 66 · Micro: 66th pctile, median 73
96 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse