Skip to content

Zenith Steel Pipes & Industries Limited (ZENITHSTL)

Small Cap

Metals stocks · Small cap · NSE

Zenith Steel Pipes & Industries Limited operates in Minerals, within the Metals sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹5.07
+0.05 · +1.00%
Market cap ₹73.3 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 09:16 am IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 09:16 am IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result14 Aug, 12:06 am IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage11/14 · 79%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Metals P/E 23.2 (n=92)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

30Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -7.3% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 49
Sector 3M: -3.4% vs Nifty 500 -4.4%
Metals FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

ZENITHSTLD candles · FIT view-21.9%TODAY · PROVISIONAL
Latest price ₹5.07 on 2026-10-21

Today's candle is provisional from the latest intraday quote; completed-candle scans remain unchanged.

Bar
+0.0%
RSI
41
MACD hist
-0.00
52W pos
11%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹5.07H ₹5.07L ₹5.07C ₹5.07Vol 20 shIntraday candle
₹4.56₹5.12₹5.68₹6.23₹6.79₹5.072026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

ZENITHSTLNifty MetalNifty 500
-9%-1%+7%+16%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026ZENITHSTL -6.5%Nifty Metal -3.8%Nifty 500 -5.6%
ZENITHSTL
-6.5%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Metal
-3.8%
Vs Nifty 500
-0.9 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-51.4%
₹10.3
52W range position
10%
₹4.4 - ₹10.3
ATR (14)
5.0%
₹0.3
Volume vs 20D
0.61x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹4.8 - ₹5.7
31.0% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
15

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -62.0% · PAT -54.2% YoY

Technical
Bearish
30

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-104.6%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
57

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -62% YoY · PAT -54% YoY · margin expansion · operating leverage

Filed 13 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹7.2 Cr-62.0%-36.4%
EBITDA₹-0.1 Cr+97.3%+95.4%
Operating margin-1.7%+2185 bps+2127 bps
PAT₹0.4 Cr-54.2%-68.3%
PAT margin6.1%+106 bps-618 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
26.40
P/B
—
EV/EBITDA
—
Market Cap
73.30Cr

Profitability

ROE
—
ROCE
39.20%
ROA
2.61%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-7.00%
EPS 5Y
2.00%
Revenue 3Y
-31.00%
EPS 3Y
30.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
-4.74×
Altman Z
-1.27
Book Value
-17.50

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
11/5
OCF
-1.09 Cr
EPS TTM
0.28

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
15.64%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
13%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 53.4-55.2% vs prev
0183.6Mar 2017: 157Mar 2018: 170Mar 2019: 184Mar 2020: 101Mar 2021: 77.9Mar 2022: 163Mar 2023: 165Mar 2024: 143Mar 2025: 119Mar 2026: 53.4FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 4.4+1804.3% vs prev
-120.2011.6Mar 2017: -33.2Mar 2018: -41.1Mar 2019: -120Mar 2020: -28.3Mar 2021: -13.6Mar 2022: 11.6Mar 2023: -14.4Mar 2024: -0.7Mar 2025: 0.2Mar 2026: 4.4FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
No data

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 41.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~8.1% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 41 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 51% off 52W high · 15% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

14
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-10.0%
3M return
-6.5%
6M return
-26.2%
1Y return
-43.9%
RS 1D
+2
RS 20D
-28
Sector rank
#4
Industry rank
#14
Stage evidence
  • Price is 11.3% below the 30-week proxy without full trend alignment.
  • The 30-week proxy changed -0.4% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
leading
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
261 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 74.09-0.55%
6181100120139Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2674
RS vs Nifty 50074

Valuation & peers

U-Score 15 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

15U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation5/30
Growth6/25
Quality3/20
Balance Sheet4/15
Cash Flow3/10
Piotroski
4/9 (+1)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
15

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

15/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Cash flow contributes 3/10 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 4/15 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 6/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is -1.3, in distress territory.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -104.6%.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
26.4
PB
—
EV/EBITDA
—
ROE
—
ROCE
39.2%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
-104.6%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
15
Previous: 15
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-104.6%
Previous: -102.6%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
12
12
12
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
8.8
Growth-justified Value
₹2.48
-104.6% MoS
PEG
8.25

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Metals — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
PRAKASHSTL
Small
Prakash Steelage Limited
Mining
match 96
20
99.1
9.1%
-4075%
OVERVALUED
RAJMET
Small
Rajnandini Metal Limited
Mining
match 96
10
40.7
-0.2%
-1610%
OVERVALUED
SMLT
Small
Sarthak Metals Limited
Mining
match 93
17
21.9
3.8%
-469%
OVERVALUED
SHYAMCENT
Small
Shyam Century Ferrous Limited
Mining
match 92
32
7.4
1.1%
-310%
WATCHLIST
SAGARDEEP
Small
Sagardeep Alloys Limited
Mining
match 90
48
13.2
7.5%
+55%
FAIR VALUE

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Zenith Steel Pipes & Industries Limited operates in Minerals, within the Metals sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
57Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 20th percentile of the scored universe and 20th percentile within Metals. Main check: results consistency is weak at 19/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
2 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
20th percentile

overall median 67 · Metals: 20th pctile, median 70 · Small: 23rd pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

2 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
66
acceptable · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
52
watch · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
80
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
19
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸11 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.00.

Trust risks

  • ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-1 Cr.
  • ▸3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸Promoter holding is only 15.6%.
  • ▸0/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 11 Sep

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Change in Management 24 Aug - Bhavika Sharma ceased as Independent Director; Aradhana Nayak appointed Additional Independent Director from 24 Aug 2026.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementJun 2026

Jun 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 18 Aug - Newspaper Publication for unaudited standalone and consolidated financial result for the quarter ended June 30, 2026

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.