Skip to content

Rajnandini Metal Limited (RAJMET)

Small Cap

Metals stocks · Small cap · NSE

Rajnandini Metal Limited operates in Minerals, within the Metals sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹2.98
-0.01 · -0.33%
Market cap ₹85.2 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals02 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 01:19 am IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Metals P/E 23.2 (n=92)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

31Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -3.9% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 50
Sector 3M: -4.5% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Metals FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

RAJMETD candles · FIT view-25.9%
Latest close ₹2.98 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-0.3%
RSI
34
MACD hist
-0.00
52W pos
10%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹2.99H ₹3.05L ₹2.94C ₹2.98Vol 1.9L sh
₹2.88₹3.22₹3.56₹3.90₹4.24₹2.982026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

RAJMETNifty MetalNifty 500
-13%-5%+2%+10%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026RAJMET -10.8%Nifty Metal -3.8%Nifty 500 -5.6%
RAJMET
-10.8%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Metal
-3.8%
Vs Nifty 500
-5.2 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-43.6%
₹5.3
52W range position
10%
₹2.7 - ₹5.3
ATR (14)
3.3%
₹0.1
Volume vs 20D
0.86x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.1 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹2.9 - ₹3.2
13.6% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
10

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -29.7% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Bearish
31

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-1609.6%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
64

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -30% YoY · margin expansion

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹52 Cr-29.7%-8.0%
EBITDA₹1 Cr+174.3%-55.7%
Operating margin2.0%+389 bps-216 bps
PAT₹0.4 CrNDF-65.5%
PAT margin0.8%+344 bps-125 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
40.70
P/B
1.51
EV/EBITDA
16.37
Market Cap
85.20Cr

Profitability

ROE
-0.21%
ROCE
4.87%
ROA
1.68%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-16.00%
EPS 5Y
-19.00%
Revenue 3Y
-37.00%
EPS 3Y
-32.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.23
Interest Coverage
1.67×
Altman Z
3.50
Book Value
2.04

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
41.08%
FCF Positive Y
4/5
OCF
22.00 Cr
EPS TTM
0.07

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
31.61%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
14%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 263-74.6% vs prev
01212Mar 2012: 80.0Mar 2018: 141Mar 2019: 137Mar 2020: 148Mar 2021: 631Mar 2022: 1,028Mar 2023: 1,029Mar 2024: 1,212Mar 2025: 1,034Mar 2026: 263FY12FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 0.0+100.0% vs prev
-2.0015.0Mar 2012: 0.0Mar 2018: 1.0Mar 2019: 1.0Mar 2020: 1.0Mar 2021: 5.0Mar 2022: 10.0Mar 2023: 14.0Mar 2024: 15.0Mar 2025: -2.0Mar 2026: 0.0FY12FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 0.0+100.0% vs prev
-3.5034.5Mar 2012: 0.0%Mar 2018: 12.5%Mar 2019: 7.7%Mar 2020: 7.1%Mar 2021: 26.3%Mar 2022: 34.5%Mar 2023: 33.3%Mar 2024: 26.3%Mar 2025: -3.5%Mar 2026: 0.0%FY12FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 34.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~4.1% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 34 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 44% off 52W high · 10% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

21
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-5.4%
3M return
-10.8%
6M return
-26.8%
1Y return
-31.0%
RS 1D
+2
RS 20D
0
Sector rank
#4
Industry rank
#14
Stage evidence
  • Price is 15.4% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -2.3%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
leading
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 65.34+0.71%
62728292102Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2665
RS vs Nifty 50065

Valuation & peers

U-Score 10 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

10U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation2/30
Growth0/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet6/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
3/9 (+1)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
10

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

10/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 41.1%.
  • Cash flow contributes 8/10 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 6/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -1609.6%.
  • Growth is weaker at 0/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
40.7
PB
1.5
EV/EBITDA
16.4
ROE
-0.2%
ROCE
4.9%
FCF Yield
41.1%
Debt/Equity
0.2
MoS
-1609.6%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
10
Previous: 10
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-1609.6%
Previous: -1609.6%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹1.79
-66.2% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
2.5
Growth-justified Value
₹0.17
-1609.6% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Metals — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
ZENITHSTL
Small
Zenith Steel Pipes & Industries Limited
Mining
match 96
15
26.4
—
-103%
OVERVALUED
SMLT
Small
Sarthak Metals Limited
Mining
match 95
17
21.9
3.8%
-469%
OVERVALUED
PRAKASHSTL
Small
Prakash Steelage Limited
Mining
match 94
20
99.1
9.1%
-4075%
OVERVALUED
SHYAMCENT
Small
Shyam Century Ferrous Limited
Mining
match 93
32
7.4
1.1%
-310%
WATCHLIST
MCL
Small
Madhav Copper Limited
Mining
match 91
19
31.3
9.4%
-289%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Rajnandini Metal Limited operates in Minerals, within the Metals sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
64Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 42nd percentile of the scored universe and 36th percentile within Metals. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 22/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
42nd percentile

overall median 67 · Metals: 36th pctile, median 70 · Small: 47th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
67
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
22
weak · capital discipline
Results
56
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 38.4%.
  • ▸4 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸Interest coverage is 1.7x.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 3.9%.
  • ▸ROE is low at -1%.
  • ▸ROCE trend is -7.1%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

3 shown
Annual reportMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Annual report · Rajnandini Metal Limited has informed the Exchange regarding Letter to those Shareholders whose e-mail ID is not registered with the Company, containing weblink and the exact path,

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.