Skip to content

VILIN BIO MED LTD. (VILINBIO)

SME Cap

Pharma stocks · SME cap · NSE

VILIN BIO MED LTD. operates in Medical Devices, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹53.25
+0.00 · +0.00%
Market cap ₹86.2 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals05 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result01 Jun, 08:00 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags04 Oct 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Pharma P/E 33.5 (n=187)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

78Bullish

SMA20 +12.2% / mo · MACD − · sector +3.8pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 64
Sector RS: 98
Sector 3M: -1.8% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but the sector index is below its 100-session average. View sector evidence

Technical chart

VILINBIOD candles · FIT view+45.1%
Latest close ₹53.25 on 2026-10-16
Bar
-4.8%
RSI
51
MACD hist
-0.39
52W pos
82%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-16O ₹55.95H ₹55.95L ₹53.25C ₹53.25Vol 16,000 sh
₹32.96₹40.29₹47.62₹54.95₹62.2852H₹53.25VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

VILINBIONifty PharmaNifty 500
-12%+8%+27%+47%16 Jul3 Sept16 Oct16 Oct 2026VILINBIO +26.0%Nifty Pharma -1.0%Nifty 500 -4.2%
VILINBIO
+26.0%
Nifty 500
-4.2%
Nifty Pharma
-1.0%
Vs Nifty 500
+30.2 pp
Chart stats
16 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-12.6%
₹61
52W range position
82%
₹19 - ₹61
ATR (14)
4.6%
₹2.5
Volume vs 20D
0.90x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.1 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹49.7 - ₹60
57.3% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, while price trend supports entry. This looks more like momentum/speculation than a clean fundamental investment setup.

Weak U-Score but strong trend: momentum may be ahead of fundamentals.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
31

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Good
55

Revenue +299.5% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Bullish
78

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+6.8%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
67

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Good · 55/100

Rev +300% YoY · margin expansion · +237% QoQ

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹32.6 Cr+299.5%+237.5%
EBITDA₹2.9 CrNDF+741.2%
Operating margin8.8%NDF+525 bps
PAT₹1.8 CrNDF+1086.7%
PAT margin5.5%NDF+391 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
44.60
P/B
3.04
EV/EBITDA
24.83
Market Cap
86.20Cr

Profitability

ROE
7.51%
ROCE
10.80%
ROA
5.52%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
30.00%
EPS 5Y
74.00%
Revenue 3Y
51.00%
EPS 3Y
16.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.01
Interest Coverage
45.71×
Altman Z
8.33
Book Value
18.60

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.46%
FCF Positive Y
2/5
OCF
0.70 Cr
EPS TTM
1.27

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
56.65%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
89%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 32.6+237.5% vs prev
032.6Mar 2022: 5.0Sep 2022: 4.1Mar 2023: 8.2Sep 2023: 7.7Mar 2024: 8.2Sep 2024: 4.5Mar 2025: 10.3Sep 2025: 9.7Mar 2026: 32.6FY22Q2 22FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 1.8+1086.7% vs prev
-0.601.8Mar 2022: 0.0Sep 2022: 0.6Mar 2023: 0.7Sep 2023: 0.8Mar 2024: -0.6Sep 2024: 0.1Mar 2025: 0.1Sep 2025: 0.1Mar 2026: 1.8FY22Q2 22FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bullish setup

Trend is constructive — long-term trend unclear. RSI 51.

  • SMA20 rising (~10.9% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 51 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 13% off 52W high · 181% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

94
RS percentile
Stage 2 UptrendEstablished S2
1M return
-9.7%
3M return
+20.7%
6M return
+53.7%
1Y return
+106.8%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
-1
Sector rank
#1
Industry rank
#3
Stage evidence
  • Price is 22.9% above the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is above the 30-week proxy and its slope is rising +9.0%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are positive.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
S2 entered
18 Feb 2026
S2 age
140 trading sessions
Sector
leading
Industry
leading
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
206 observations
16 Oct 2026Value 203.41-2.95%
60104147191234Sept 25Jan 26Jun 26Oct 26203
RS vs Nifty 500203

Valuation & peers

U-Score 31 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

31U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation3/30
Growth19/25
Quality1/20
Balance Sheet10/15
Cash Flow2/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
-9
Raw sum
31

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

31/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Growth contributes 19/25 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 10/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 9 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 1/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 3/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Healthcare valuation: PE/EVEBITDA with regulatory and pipeline checks

Healthcare valuation needs both earnings quality and regulatory/pipeline context.

Pharma PE/EVEBITDA
Primary lens
PE and EV/EBITDA adjusted for product mix and R&D/pipeline quality.
Secondary checks
USFDA risk, launch pipeline, margin trend, domestic vs export mix.
Main risk check
Regulatory setbacks or one-off product cycles can distort valuation.
PE
44.6
PB
3.0
EV/EBITDA
24.8
ROE
7.5%
ROCE
10.8%
FCF Yield
0.5%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+6.8%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
31
Previous: 31
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
+6.8%
Previous: +6.8%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹23.05
-131.0% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
45.0
Growth-justified Value
₹57.15
+6.8% MoS
PEG
0.88

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Pharma — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
OSELDEVICE
SME
Osel Devices Ltd.
Medical Devices
match 152
60
21.1
18.7%
+53%
UNDERVALUED
POLYMED
Large
Poly Medicure Limited
Medical Devices
match 148
32
50.1
9.0%
-11%
WATCHLIST
GML
SME
Galaxy Medicare Ltd.
Medical Devices
match 134
67
8.3
10.8%
+81%
UNDERVALUED
ANONDITA
SME
Anondita Medicare Ltd.
Medical Devices
match 130
59
61.0
40.2%
-72%
FAIR VALUE
INFLUX
SME
Influx Healthtech Ltd.
Medical Devices
match 126
27
31.8
19.0%
-296%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

VILIN BIO MED LTD. operates in Medical Devices, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
67Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 52nd percentile of the scored universe and 39th percentile within Pharma. Main check: results consistency is weak at 29/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
52nd percentile

overall median 67 · Pharma: 39th pctile, median 70 · SME: 66th pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
68
acceptable · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
65
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
68
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
29
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 56.7%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is positive at 0.6%.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.01.

Trust risks

  • ▸Promoter holding fell 7.2%.
  • ▸4 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸ROE is low at 7.5%.
  • ▸0/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

2 shown
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.