Skip to content

The United Nilgiri Tea Estates Company Limited (UNITEDTEA)

Small Cap

Consumer stocks · Small cap · NSE

The United Nilgiri Tea Estates Company Limited operates in Retail / E-Commerce, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹411.6
+0.30 · +0.07%
Market cap ₹207 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 01:32 am IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage12/14 · 86%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

29Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -5.9% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector -3.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 24
Sector RS: 36
Sector 3M: -9.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

UNITEDTEAD candles · FIT view-23.9%
Latest close ₹411.60 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-0.1%
RSI
39
MACD hist
0.91
52W pos
10%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹412.20H ₹415.90L ₹409.05C ₹411.60Vol 1,054 sh
₹383.19₹432.77₹482.35₹531.93₹581.5152L₹411.602026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

UNITEDTEANifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
-15%-8%-1%+6%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026UNITEDTEA -11.1%Nifty Consumer Durabl… -9.7%Nifty 500 -5.6%
UNITEDTEA
-11.1%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Consumer Durables
-9.7%
Vs Nifty 500
-5.5 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-30.2%
₹590
52W range position
10%
₹392.2 - ₹590
ATR (14)
3.1%
₹12.9
Volume vs 20D
0.53x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.1 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹392.2 - ₹439
18.0% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
27

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -10.5% · PAT -20.4% YoY

Technical
Bearish
29

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-116.4%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
60

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -10% YoY · PAT -20% YoY · margin compression · +22% QoQ

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹19.8 Cr-10.5%+21.6%
EBITDA₹5.1 Cr-23.8%+48.5%
Operating margin25.6%-449 bps+465 bps
PAT₹6.4 Cr-20.4%+74.3%
PAT margin32.2%-404 bps+973 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
17.70
P/B
1.78
EV/EBITDA
12.94
Market Cap
207.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
10.80%
ROCE
14.00%
ROA
9.60%
Dividend Y
0.77%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
1.00%
EPS 5Y
1.00%
Revenue 3Y
9.00%
EPS 3Y
9.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
—
Altman Z
8.42
Book Value
233.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
1/5
OCF
6.00 Cr
EPS TTM
23.60

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
49.86%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
5%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 19.8+21.6% vs prev
025.0Sep 2023: 19.2Dec 2023: 23.6Mar 2024: 21.9Jun 2024: 23.0Sep 2024: 25.0Dec 2024: 22.9Mar 2025: 18.9Jun 2025: 22.1Sep 2025: 21.1Dec 2025: 23.8Mar 2026: 16.3Jun 2026: 19.8Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 6.4+74.3% vs prev
08.0Sep 2023: 3.9Dec 2023: 4.3Mar 2024: 3.0Jun 2024: 3.7Sep 2024: 6.4Dec 2024: 4.5Mar 2025: 3.8Jun 2025: 8.0Sep 2025: 4.9Dec 2025: 5.3Mar 2026: 3.7Jun 2026: 6.4Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 39. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~6.2% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 39 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

43
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-4.6%
3M return
-11.1%
6M return
-23.3%
1Y return
-7.7%
RS 1D
+6
RS 20D
+8
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#22
Stage evidence
  • Price is 15.0% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -2.4%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 91.87+1.10%
8695105115125Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2692
RS vs Nifty 50092

Valuation & peers

U-Score 27 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

27U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation6/30
Growth6/25
Quality3/20
Balance Sheet8/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-2
Raw sum
27

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

27/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Balance sheet contributes 8/15 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 6/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 2 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -116.4%.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 1/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
17.7
PB
1.8
EV/EBITDA
12.9
ROE
10.8%
ROCE
14.0%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
-116.4%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
27
Previous: 27
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-116.4%
Previous: -116.4%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹351.74
-17.0% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
8.1
Growth-justified Value
₹190.22
-116.4% MoS
PEG
11.06

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
RANASUG
Small
Rana Sugars Limited
Retail
match 109
22
—
-4.1%
-911%
OVERVALUED
TEAMGTY
Small
Team India Guaranty Limited
Retail
match 109
20
472.0
—
-1391%
OVERVALUED
PAVNAIND
Small
Pavna Industries Limited
Retail
match 109
15
28.5
2.6%
-371%
OVERVALUED
SAKHTISUG
Small
Sakthi Sugars Limited
Retail
match 109
12
—
-59.4%
—
OVERVALUED
SIGIND
Small
Signet Industries Limited
Retail
match 108
46
8.4
8.0%
+69%
FAIR VALUE

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

The United Nilgiri Tea Estates Company Limited operates in Retail / E-Commerce, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
60Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 28th percentile of the scored universe and 30th percentile within Consumer. Main check: results consistency is weak at 19/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
28th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 30th pctile, median 66 · Small: 32nd pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
43
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
88
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
68
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
19
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.00.

Trust risks

  • ▸Only 1 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • ▸1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 16.2%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

4 shown
Annual reportMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Annual report · UNITEDTEA: The United Nilgiri Tea Estates Company Limited has informed the Exchange about Copy of Newspaper Publication on dispatch of Annual Report for the financial year ended 31

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportJul 2026

Annual report · The United Nilgiri Tea Estates Company Limited has informed the Exchange about General Updates on dispatch of letter to shareholders containing a weblink directing to the Annual Re

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.