Skip to content

Rana Sugars Limited (RANASUG)

Small Cap

Consumer stocks · Small cap · NSE

Rana Sugars Limited operates in Retail / E-Commerce, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹12.6
-0.66 · -4.98%
Market cap ₹209 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result14 Aug, 05:53 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags04 Oct 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

32Bearish

SMA20 -9.1% / mo · MACD − · sector -3.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 29
Sector RS: 36
Sector 3M: -9.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

RANASUGD candles · FIT view-4.7%
Latest close ₹12.60 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-3.7%
RSI
34
MACD hist
-0.08
52W pos
38%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹13.09H ₹13.60L ₹12.35C ₹12.60Vol 3.2L sh
₹11.27₹12.63₹13.98₹15.34₹16.7052H₹12.602026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

RANASUGNifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
-15%+3%+21%+39%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026RANASUG +6.1%Nifty Consumer Durabl… -9.7%Nifty 500 -5.6%
RANASUG
+6.1%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Consumer Durables
-9.7%
Vs Nifty 500
+11.7 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-23.4%
₹16.5
52W range position
38%
₹10.2 - ₹16.5
ATR (14)
5.0%
₹0.6
Volume vs 20D
0.86x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.5 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹12.4 - ₹14.6
38.0% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
22

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -12.6% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Bearish
32

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-911.0%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
52

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -13% YoY · margin compression · +6% QoQ

Filed 14 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹464 Cr-12.6%+5.9%
EBITDA₹-11 Cr-257.1%-155.0%
Operating margin-2.3%-360 bps-690 bps
PAT₹-21 CrNDF-175.0%
PAT margin-4.5%-397 bps-1092 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
—
P/B
0.37
EV/EBITDA
9.15
Market Cap
209.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
-4.09%
ROCE
3.29%
ROA
0.46%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
7.00%
EPS 5Y
-13.00%
Revenue 3Y
2.00%
EPS 3Y
-21.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.61
Interest Coverage
0.88×
Altman Z
2.10
Book Value
37.20

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
50.72%
FCF Positive Y
9/5
OCF
92.00 Cr
EPS TTM
0.38

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
22.64%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
56%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 464+5.9% vs prev
0531.0Sep 2023: 340Dec 2023: 337Mar 2024: 415Jun 2024: 462Sep 2024: 386Dec 2024: 390Mar 2025: 475Jun 2025: 531Sep 2025: 345Dec 2025: 429Mar 2026: 438Jun 2026: 464Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -21.0-175.0% vs prev
-21.0040.0Sep 2023: -15.0Dec 2023: 6.0Mar 2024: 22.0Jun 2024: 2.0Sep 2024: -15.0Dec 2024: 14.0Mar 2025: 40.0Jun 2025: -3.0Sep 2025: -14.0Dec 2025: 13.0Mar 2026: 28.0Jun 2026: -21.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 34.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 falling (~10.0% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 34 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 23% off 52W high · 23% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

51
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-12.7%
3M return
+6.1%
6M return
-10.6%
1Y return
-12.1%
RS 1D
-6
RS 20D
-15
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#22
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 4.1% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +2.3% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 91.18-3.99%
728191100110Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2691
RS vs Nifty 50091

Valuation & peers

U-Score 22 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

22U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation8/30
Growth2/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet4/15
Cash Flow10/10
Piotroski
4/9 (+1)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
22

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

22/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 50.7%.
  • Cash flow contributes 10/10 to the score.
  • Valuation contributes 8/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -911.0%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
—
PB
0.4
EV/EBITDA
9.2
ROE
-4.1%
ROCE
3.3%
FCF Yield
50.7%
Debt/Equity
0.6
MoS
-911.0%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
22
Previous: 22
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-911.0%
Previous: -911.0%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹17.83
+29.3% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
3.3
Growth-justified Value
₹1.25
-911.0% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
TEAMGTY
Small
Team India Guaranty Limited
Retail
match 110
20
472.0
—
-1391%
OVERVALUED
UNITEDTEA
Small
The United Nilgiri Tea Estates Company Limited
Retail
match 109
27
17.7
10.8%
-116%
OVERVALUED
PAVNAIND
Small
Pavna Industries Limited
Retail
match 109
15
28.5
2.6%
-371%
OVERVALUED
SAKHTISUG
Small
Sakthi Sugars Limited
Retail
match 109
12
—
-59.4%
—
OVERVALUED
SHREYANIND
Small
Shreyans Industries Limited
Retail
match 108
17
—
1.5%
—
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Rana Sugars Limited operates in Retail / E-Commerce, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
52Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 10th percentile of the scored universe and 12th percentile within Consumer. Main check: results consistency is weak at 15/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
8 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
10th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 12th pctile, median 66 · Small: 12th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

8 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
66
acceptable · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
51
watch · leverage and solvency
Discipline
22
weak · capital discipline
Results
15
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 50.2%.
  • ▸9 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸Promoter holding is only 22.6%.
  • ▸Interest coverage is 0.9x.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 3.5%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 4 Sep - Copies of the Newspaper Publication in the Newspapers as per the provisions of SEBI (LODR)

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 19 Aug - Copy of the Newspaper Publication for informing the shareholders of the Company about the opening of Special Window as per SEBI Notification

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 17 Jul - Shareholders have been informed to update their email ids for the upcoming AGM

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.