Skip to content

Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Limited (TMPV)

Large Cap

Auto stocks · Large cap · NSE

Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Limited (TMPV) is the consolidated passenger vehicle business of Tata Motors, encompassing Tata Passenger Vehicles (PV) and Electric Vehicles (EV) in India, and Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) globally. It includes manufacturing, sales, and related operations.

₹278
-8.85 · -3.09%
Market cap ₹1,05,720 Cr
IndicesNifty 500
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals16 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result13 Aug, 04:06 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags04 Oct 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Auto P/E 25.7 (n=127)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

34Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -7.5% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low

Stock trend: 24
Sector RS: 49
Sector 3M: -6.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Auto FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

TMPVD candles · FIT view-20.7%
Latest close ₹278.00 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-2.1%
RSI
38
MACD hist
1.12
52W pos
4%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹284.00H ₹285.85L ₹277.80C ₹278.00Vol 52.7L sh
₹265.41₹302.75₹340.10₹377.44₹414.7952L₹278.002026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

TMPVNifty AutoNifty 500
-22%-10%+1%+12%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026TMPV -17.4%Nifty Auto -5.4%Nifty 500 -5.6%
TMPV
-17.4%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Auto
-5.4%
Vs Nifty 500
-11.8 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-33.7%
₹419
52W range position
4%
₹272.2 - ₹419
ATR (14)
2.7%
₹7.5
Volume vs 20D
0.49x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹287 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹272.2 - ₹303.8
28.5% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Strong fundamentals, management trust needs verification, but price trend argues for patience. Suitable for staggered entry or watchlist confirmation rather than aggressive buying.

Strong U-Score but weak trend: timing is not confirming the thesis.

Suggested next step
Add to watchlist
Fundamental setup is interesting, but technical confirmation is weak.
U-Score
Legacy · DEEP VALUE
78

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue +9.3% · PAT -78.5% YoY

Technical
Bearish
34

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+96.7%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Mixed Trust
55

medium confidence · 3/4 claims checked

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -79% YoY · margin compression · Rev +9% YoY

Filed 13 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹95,799 Cr+9.3%-9.2%
EBITDA₹6,176 Cr-24.3%-45.1%
Operating margin6.0%-300 bps-500 bps
PAT₹859 Cr-78.5%-85.4%
PAT margin0.9%-367 bps-467 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
106.00
P/B
0.94
EV/EBITDA
5.03
Market Cap
105720.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
75.70%
ROCE
2.73%
ROA
20.97%
Dividend Y
1.05%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
6.00%
EPS 5Y
101.00%
Revenue 3Y
-1.00%
EPS 3Y
232.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.71
Interest Coverage
5.69×
Altman Z
1.81
Book Value
304.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
6/5
OCF
13041.00 Cr
EPS TTM
215.18

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
42.51%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
10%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 335.6k-8.3% vs prev
0434kMar 2017: 269.7kMar 2018: 291.6kMar 2019: 301.9kMar 2020: 261.1kMar 2021: 249.8kMar 2022: 278.5kMar 2023: 346.0kMar 2024: 434.0kMar 2025: 366.1kMar 2026: 335.6kFY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 82.6k+193.6% vs prev
-29k083kMar 2017: 7,557Mar 2018: 9,091Mar 2019: -28.7kMar 2020: -12.0kMar 2021: -13.4kMar 2022: -11.3kMar 2023: 2,690Mar 2024: 31.8kMar 2025: 28.1kMar 2026: 82.6kFY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 73.8+204.2% vs prev
-47.7073.8Mar 2017: 13.0%Mar 2018: 9.5%Mar 2019: -47.7%Mar 2020: -19.0%Mar 2021: -24.3%Mar 2022: -25.4%Mar 2023: 5.9%Mar 2024: 37.5%Mar 2025: 24.2%Mar 2026: 73.8%FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 38.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~8.1% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 38 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Valuation & peers

U-Score 78 · legacy U-Score band DEEP VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies

78U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · DEEP VALUE
Valuation30/30
Growth17/25
Quality13/20
Balance Sheet8/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
78

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

78/100 · legacy band DEEP VALUE

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 96.7%.
  • Valuation contributes 30/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 8/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 13/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
106.0
PB
0.9
EV/EBITDA
5.0
ROE
75.7%
ROCE
2.7%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.7
MoS
+96.7%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
78
Previous: 78
Legacy U-Score band
DEEP VALUE
Previous: DEEP VALUE
Margin of safety
+96.7%
Previous: +96.7%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹1,213.19
+77.1% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
38.5
Growth-justified Value
₹8,295.19
+96.7% MoS
PEG
0.69

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Auto — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
TMCV
Large
Tata Motors Limited
Auto / Auto Ancillary
match 165
54
21.0
34.0%
-32%
FAIR VALUE
HYUNDAI
Large
Hyundai Motor India Limited
Passenger Vehicles
match 123
58
32.2
29.9%
+17%
FAIR VALUE
HEROMOTOCO
Large
Hero MotoCorp Limited
Two Wheelers
match 101
71
18.1
28.1%
+50%
UNDERVALUED
BOSCHLTD
Large
Bosch Limited
Auto Components
match 93
45
55.6
14.6%
-46%
WATCHLIST
EICHERMOT
Large
Eicher Motors Limited
Two Wheelers & CV
match 92
61
33.4
24.0%
+9%
UNDERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-10-13T08:46:11.344Z
Management commentary snapshot

Q1 FY27 consolidated revenue grew 9.3% YoY to 95.8K Cr, but EBITDA margin contracted 130 bps YoY to 7.4%. JLR faced volume declines and margin pressure, while India PV delivered strong volume and revenue growth, with EV volumes more than doubling YoY.

Consolidated results are under stress due to JLR's significant volume and profitability decline, driven by supply issues, geopolitical events, and model transitions. While India PV shows robust growth, its contribution is insufficient to offset JLR's drag on consolidated margins and FCF. Management's focus on new launches and cost control is critical, but execution risks remain high given the challenging environment.

Current business mix

Tata PV Powertrain Mix (Q1 FY27)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 4 reported categories.

Businessmix
Petrol42.0%
Diesel12.0%
CNG27.0%
EV19.0%
Growth engines

EV Portfolio Expansion

Tata PV's EV off-take volumes grew 112% YoY, maintaining ~40% market share.

New Product Launches

Sierra.ev, next-gen Tiago & Tiago.ev, Range Rover Electric, Range Rover GT, and Jaguar Type 01 are poised for launch.

North America Growth

JLR plans to double down on growth in North America.

Favorable Powertrain Shifts

Tata PV leverages growing demand for CNG and EV with its strong portfolio.

Capacity and execution

Production Scale-up

Tata PV plans to scale up production of key models and undertake capacity expansion to meet market demand.

Investment Spend

JLR's Q1 investment spend was 0.9bn, in line with expectations for new product launches.

Tailwinds

Robust Domestic Demand

Strong PV industry volumes in India, supported by robust post-GST 2.0 demand environment.

Green Powertrain Growth

High growth in green powertrains (EV & CNG) and favorable regulation & policies for EVs in India.

Strong Demand Pipeline

Tata PV reports a strong demand pipeline for its products.

Headwinds

Supply Chain Disruptions

Temporary supply constraints, including a fire at a major component supplier, affected JLR volumes.

Commodity & FX Pressures

Elevated commodity levels and unfavorable operational FX impacted margins for both JLR and Tata PV.

Geopolitical & Market Disruption

Middle East conflict and market conditions pushed JLR's retail VME up, impacting profitability.

Jaguar Model Wind-down

Planned wind down of outgoing Jaguar models ahead of new launches affected JLR volumes.

Risk radar

Global Geopolitical Developments

Implications from global geopolitical developments remain a key monitorable for JLR.

Luxury Segment Industry Trends

Industry trends in the luxury segment are a key monitorable for JLR.

Supply Chain Volatility

Persistent supply chain headwinds could continue to impact production and volumes.

Commodity Price Inflation

Elevated commodity prices could continue to pressure margins if not fully passed through.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Nov 2025
Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY is crucial for assessing overall growth and performance against the previous year, especially for the seasonal auto business. QoQ is important for JLR to track sequential recovery from supply constraints and model transitions, and for Tata PV to monitor momentum.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Volume Growth (JLR Wholesales)

Down 9.2% YoY to 79.3K units.

Volume Growth (JLR Retails)

Down 15.4% YoY to 79.9K units.

Volume Growth (Tata PV Wholesales)

Up 46.1% YoY to 182.3K units.

EV Offtake Volumes (Tata PV)

Up 112% YoY to 11.5K units.

Management forward view

JLR Priorities

Seamless execution of launch pipeline, organization pivot to double down growth in North America, and achieving enterprise missions plan.

Tata PV Priorities

Debottlenecking supply chain, expanding production capacity, sustaining market leadership in EV, and mitigating cost headwinds to improve margins.

Consolidated Strategy

Drive brand-led growth and increase meaningful synergies across supplier ecosystem, software/digital technologies, and strategic partnerships.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
JLR Wholesale Volumes79.3K units (Q1 FY27)Recovery from supply constraints and model transitions.
Tata PV EV Offtake Volumes11.5K units (Q1 FY27)Sustained growth and market share amidst rising competition.
Consolidated EBITDA Margin7.4% (Q1 FY27)Improvement from cost actions and commodity price moderation.
JLR Free Cash Flow( 998m) (Q1 FY27)Positive FCF generation in subsequent quarters, typical for Q1 to be negative.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Show extracted source claims
capex timelinenot yet verifiable

Domestic India business is net cash, providing flexibility to fund a rich product investment cycle that will be coming through in the years.

Timeframe: In the yearsDirection: IncreaseConfidence: Implied high

"fund the rich product investment cycle that will be coming through in the years"

export growthcontradicted

JLR will continue to focus on growing its overseas business in the second half of the fiscal year.

Timeframe: H2Direction: GrowingConfidence: Implied high

"continue to focus on growing our overseas business"

Outcome check: Revenue YoY averaged -9.3% across 2 later quarter(s).

pricingdelivered

VME (Variable Marketing Expense) levels are anticipated to stay elevated for some time due to challenging market conditions.

Timeframe: For some timeDirection: ElevatedConfidence: Anticipate

"we anticipate VME levels to stay elevated for some time"

Outcome check: OPM moved from -2.0% to average 6.0% (+8.0 pp).

revenue outlookdelivered

Production losses experienced will heavily impact Q3, with a return to normal expected in Q4 as pipeline fill completes.

Timeframe: Q3, Q4Direction: Negative (Q3), Normalization (Q4)Confidence: Implied high

"The production losses we have experienced will also impact quite heavily on Q3. It's only in Q4, as our pipeline fill completes that we will return to normal."

Outcome check: Revenue YoY averaged -9.3% across 2 later quarter(s).

Trust Score
55Mixed Trust · medium confidenceClaim-tested Trust

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Management has 67% delivered/partly-delivered outcomes on 3 checked claims, with 1 adverse claim outcome. It ranks around the 16th percentile of the scored universe and 6th percentile within Auto. Main check: results consistency is weak at 17/100.

Mixed Trust: 3/4 extracted management claims have outcome checks; 67% were fully delivered and 0 were partially delivered. 1 claim(s) were contradicted or failed. Key concern: 3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Computed 20 Oct 2026
management-trust-v1
42 extracted concalls · 3/4 claims matched
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
16th percentile

overall median 67 · Auto: 6th pctile, median 74 · Large: 9th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Early sample

3/4 claims checked. Use as directional, not final.

Claim delivery
67% delivered or partly delivered

3/4 claims checked · 1 contradicted/failed claim

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · medium confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using management claims matched with later outcomes.
Confidence
Useful directional evidence exists, but still verify the latest filings.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
73
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
46
watch · capital discipline
Results
17
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸6 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 2.7%.
  • ▸ROCE trend is -9.9%.
  • ▸1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Allotment of ESOP / ESPS 21 Sep - Pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, we are enclosing herewith an intimation regarding the allotment of 1,00,596 Equity Shares under TMPVL …

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Press Release / Media Release 7 Sep - JLR targets £1.7 billion savings over two years, cutting around 4,000 roles through consultation.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 28 Aug - Pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, we are enclosing herewith the details of the Analyst Meet scheduled to be held ....

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 14 Aug - Pursuant to Regulation 47 of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, we are enclosing herewith the newspaper publication of the financial results for the first quarter …

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.