IP
IndiaPulse

Swiggy Limited (SWIGGY)

Mid Cap

Consumer stocks · Mid cap · NSE

Swiggy is an Indian urban convenience platform offering food delivery, quick commerce (Instamart), and out-of-home dining (Dineout). It aims to elevate consumer quality of life through unparalleled convenience, focusing on growth and profitability across its diverse service portfolio.

₹276.1
+6.80 · +2.53%
Quote04 Sept, 03:58 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage10/14 · 71%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 23.3 (n=433)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
15

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
60

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
43

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
stable
67

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Good · 55/100

Rev +37% YoY · margin expansion · +7% QoQ

Filed 30 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹6,812 Cr+37.3%+6.7%
EBITDA₹-651 Cr+31.8%+6.7%
Operating margin-10.0%+900 bps+100 bps
PAT₹-791 CrNDFNDF
PAT margin-11.6%+1252 bps+92 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-04T08:07:45.435Z
Management commentary snapshot

Swiggy's Q4 FY26 saw Food GOV surge 22.6% YoY, a 15-quarter high, driven by order/user volume. Quick commerce GOV grew 68.8% YoY, with contribution margin improving to -1.8%. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA losses narrowed to INR 652 Cr, while Food delivery achieved a record 3.3% Adjusted EBITDA margin.

The company is demonstrating strong execution in food delivery, achieving record profitability and growth. Quick commerce is prioritizing unit economics, showing significant margin improvement despite intense competition. Overall platform losses are narrowing, supporting the long-term profitability thesis.

Growth engines

Food Delivery Affordability

99-Store and Toing (affordable restaurant marketplace) lower entry barriers for value-conscious consumers.

Food Delivery Convenience/Speed

Bolt and One BLCK redefine convenience for time-sensitive users, driving user growth.

Dineout Platform Expansion

Cross-sell from Food delivery to dining creates a compounding organic flywheel, with 52k active restaurant partners.

Quick Commerce Differentiation

Instamart aims to be a destination for 'everyday upgrades' with differentiated assortment, like Noice (clean-food private brand).

Capacity and execution

Quick Commerce Darkstores

Total darkstore area increased to over 4.8 Mn sq ft (+21.1% YoY), adding 7 darkstores to reach 1,143 across 129 cities.

Darkstore Utilization

Current utilization at ~40%; can comfortably double business without significant new store additions (except for densification).

Tailwinds

Expanding Discretionary Incomes

In-restaurant dining is a secular growth opportunity, with the category significantly underpenetrated even in top-tier cities.

Food Delivery Growth Initiatives

Disciplined execution and focused launches across 'selection-speed-affordability' framework driving momentum.

Quick Commerce Market Opportunity

Medium term opportunity remains attractive, aiming for over 1 lakh crore Net Order Value business with 4-5% EBITDA.

Headwinds

Quick Commerce Competition

Highly competitive segment with increasing players and intensity, leading to a temporary order volume slowdown.

Gig Workforce Migration

Peak harvest season and state elections triggered temporary migration, constraining delivery partner supply across the industry.

Increased Delivery Times

Momentary increase in promised delivery times across some cities due to gig worker shortage, leading to demand throttling.

Risk radar

New Food Delivery Competition

New entrants must find value vectors not already addressed; Swiggy proactively pre-empts these openings through targeted innovations.

Quick Commerce Profitability vs. Growth

Deliberate choice to prioritize margin integrity over vanity volume in response to irrational discounting and high variable costs.

Instamart Differentiation Execution

Long-term success hinges on ability to drive differentiation, not just value/price, requiring work with partner brands across categories.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY is crucial for assessing annual growth trends and market penetration in a growing sector. QoQ is vital for tracking sequential momentum, operational efficiency improvements, and the impact of recent strategic decisions, especially in competitive quick commerce.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Food delivery GOV

Grew 22.6% YoY to INR 9,005 Cr, a 15-quarter high.

Food delivery Adjusted EBITDA Margin

Increased to 3.3% of GOV (+41bps YoY, +26bps QoQ), a lifetime high.

Food delivery MTU

Accelerated to 21% YoY (+0.2 Mn QoQ), reaching 18.3 Mn.

Quick commerce GOV

Grew 68.8% YoY to INR 7,881 Cr.

Management forward view

Food Delivery GOV Growth

Reiterate sustainable medium term guidance of 18-20% YoY GOV growth.

Food Delivery Adjusted EBITDA Margin

Adjusted EBITDA margin guidance of 5% of GOV in the medium-term remains unchanged.

Quick Commerce Contribution Margin

Confident of achieving break-even CM guidance in Q1FY27, having made rapid progress of 450 bps improvement.

Capex Reduction

Overall capex investments to meaningfully come down in FY27, with significant headroom created in infrastructure network.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Quick Commerce Contribution Margin-1.8% (Q4FY26), -1.1% (Mar-26)Achieving break-even in Q1FY27, as guided by management.
Food Delivery Adjusted EBITDA Margin3.3% of GOVProgressive movement towards 5% of GOV in the medium-term.
Quick Commerce Darkstore Utilization~40%Increased utilization to drive compounding operating leverage and business doubling.
Consolidated Cash BalanceINR 15,053 CrNormalization of working capital and meaningful reduction in capex in FY27.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

43Neutral

SMA20 +1.4% / mo · MACD −

Stock trend: 42
Sector RS: 45
Sector 3M: -2.3% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

SWIGGYdaily · 1Y · AUTO-7.5%
Latest close ₹276.10 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+2.5%
RSI
49
MACD hist
-1.73
52W pos
17%
2026-09-04O ₹269.30H ₹284.40L ₹269.30C ₹276.10Vol 18.4Cr sh
₹230.61₹258.87₹287.14₹315.40₹343.6652L276.102026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 49.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 rising (~1.4% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 49 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 42% off 52W high · 17% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

15
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-1.7%
3M return
+10.5%
6M return
-1.7%
1Y return
-36.8%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
+1
Sector rank
#12
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 0.0% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed -2.3% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 68.14+2.53%
577186100115Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2668
RS vs Nifty 50068

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 15 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

15U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation2/30
Growth6/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet5/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
2/9 (+0)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
15

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

15/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Balance sheet contributes 5/15 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 6/25 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 1/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 2/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 1/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
PB
4.2
EV/EBITDA
ROE
-29.1%
ROCE
-24.1%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
15
Previous: 15
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
17
17
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
Growth-justified P/E
7.4
Growth-justified Value
— MoS
PEG

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
60Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 28th percentile of the scored universe and 30th percentile within Consumer. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 40/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-2898 Cr.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
32 docs text-extracted · 15 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
28th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 30th pctile, median 66 · Mid: 14th pctile, median 76

Evidence depth
Financial-only

32 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
40
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
81
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
67
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-2898 Cr.
  • ROCE is low at -24.1%.
  • ROE is low at -29.1%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
P/B
4.16
EV/EBITDA
Market Cap
76212.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
-29.10%
ROCE
-24.10%
ROA
-14.85%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
55.00%
EPS 5Y
Revenue 3Y
41.00%
EPS 3Y

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.14
Interest Coverage
-13.83×
Altman Z
7.87
Book Value
66.40

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
2/5
OCF
-2898.00 Cr
EPS TTM
-14.01

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
17%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Consumer, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.