Annual report
Annual Report 2026
Source: Nse
Sumit Woods Limited (SUMIT)
Small CapReal Estate stocks · Small cap · NSE
Sumit Woods Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 05:57 pm ISTDetails
Quote21 Oct, 05:57 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 01:46 am IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Real Estate P/E 22.2 (n=72)
Technical timing lens
Trend score and candlestick chart
36BearishSMA20 -3.4% / mo · MACD − · sector -5.2pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)
Stock trend: 29
Sector RS: 45
Sector 3M: -10.8% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Real Estate FPI tailwindNot confirmed
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Technical chart
SUMITD candles · FIT view-17.9%Latest close ₹43.45 on 2026-10-21
Bar
-10.2%
RSI
33
MACD hist
-0.38
52W pos
20%
2026-10-21O ₹48.40H ₹48.40L ₹42.22C ₹43.45Vol 28,204 sh
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context
Relative performance and chart statistics
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
SUMITNifty RealtyNifty 500
- SUMIT
- -17.0%
- Nifty 500
- -6.5%
- Nifty Realty
- -13.1%
- Vs Nifty 500
- -10.5 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026- From 52W high
- -55.0%
- 52W range position
- 18%
- ATR (14)
- 8.8%
- Volume vs 20D
- 1.09x
- Avg traded value
- ₹0.1 Cr
- 20D price channel
- ₹42.2 - ₹53
₹96.5
₹31.7 - ₹96.5
₹3.8
Latest completed session
20-session average
55.4% annualized volatility
Research snapshot
What the evidence says now
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.
Suggested next step
Verify management risk first
Do not let cheap valuation override weak Trust or governance evidence.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED23
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Latest result
Average37
Revenue +6.9% · PAT +17.8% YoY
Technical
Bearish36
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Valuation
Legacy model+7.5%
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Trust
Limited evidence44
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Latest result
Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026
Average · 37/100margin compression · Rev +7% YoY · PAT +18% YoY · +59% QoQ · operating leverage
Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹45.2 Cr | +6.9% | +59.4% |
| EBITDA | ₹4.5 Cr | -30.0% | +3.9% |
| Operating margin | 10.1% | -530 bps | -536 bps |
| PAT | ₹4 Cr | +17.8% | +208.4% |
| PAT margin | 8.9% | +83 bps | +432 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 36.30
- P/B
- 1.29
- EV/EBITDA
- 23.19
- Market Cap
- 242.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 3.50%
- ROCE
- 6.55%
- ROA
- 1.64%
- Dividend Y
- 0.39%
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 15.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 18.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- -2.00%
- EPS 3Y
- -7.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.63
- Interest Coverage
- 1.75×
- Altman Z
- 1.69
- Book Value
- 39.20
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 4/5
- OCF
- -46.87 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 1.41
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 60.85%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 26%
Financial History
Updated 21/10/2026
Revenue
₹ CrLatest: 45.2+59.4% vs prev
Net Profit
₹ CrLatest: 4.0+208.4% vs prev
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Daily technical trend read
Bearish setupTrend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 33.
- Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
- SMA20 falling (~3.5% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 33 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
- 52% off 52W high · 37% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Nifty 500 leadership
Relative Strength & Trend Stage
13
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-12.3%
3M return
-17.0%
6M return
-17.9%
1Y return
-49.5%
RS 1D
-4
RS 20D
-11
Sector rank
#18
Industry rank
#69
Stage evidence
- Price is 10.3% below the 30-week proxy without full trend alignment.
- The 30-week proxy changed +2.6% over 20 sessions.
- The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 50.43-6.40%
RS vs Nifty 50050
Valuation & peers
U-Score 23 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Valuation & peers
U-Score 23 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Distress Watch
Fundamental score breakdown
U band · OVERVALUEDValuation3/30
Growth13/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet4/15
Cash Flow3/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
23
Why this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
23/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED
Positive drivers
- Growth contributes 13/25 to the score.
- Cash flow contributes 3/10 to the score.
- Balance sheet contributes 4/15 to the score.
Main drags
- Altman Z is 1.7, in distress territory.
- Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
- Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model
Real estate valuation: NAV, pre-sales, debt, and inventory quality
Real estate valuation depends more on project economics and balance sheet than simple PE.
Primary lens
NAV and market cap versus project pipeline and pre-sales.
Secondary checks
Inventory age, net debt, collections, execution record.
Main risk check
Book value can overstate value if inventory is slow or debt is high.
PE
36.3
PB
1.3
EV/EBITDA
23.2
ROE
3.5%
ROCE
6.5%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.6
MoS
+7.5%
Score movement
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
23
Previous: 23
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
+7.5%
Previous: +0.2%
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
23
23
Factor attribution
No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Modelled fair value
Graham Number
₹35.26
-23.2% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
33.3
Growth-justified Value
₹46.95
+7.5% MoS
PEG
2.02
Comparable companies
Peers
Business-comparable peers in Real Estate — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
RPPINFRA
Small
R.P.P. Infra Projects Limited
Real Estate
match 167
16
122.0
1.9%
-1360%
OVERVALUED
SHRADHA
Small
Shradha Realty Limited
Real Estate
match 164
64
8.9
7.0%
+74%
UNDERVALUED
RUDRA
Small
Rudra Global Infra Products Limited
Real Estate
match 164
45
11.5
10.4%
+64%
WATCHLIST
NILAINFRA
Small
Nila Infrastructures Limited
Real Estate
match 163
67
10.6
12.9%
+69%
UNDERVALUED
VIPULLTD
Small
Vipul Limited
Real Estate
match 163
13
—
-3.9%
—
OVERVALUED
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business and thesis
Issuer presentation review pending
Sumit Woods Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trust Score
44Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 2nd percentile of the scored universe and 7th percentile within Real Estate. Main check: results consistency is weak at 5/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
8 docs text-extracted · 1 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
Relative rank
2nd percentile
overall median 67 · Real Estate: 7th pctile, median 61 · Small: 2nd pctile, median 66
Evidence depth
Financial-only
8 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
Claim delivery
Outcome history still building
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Limited evidence · low confidenceWhat it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Do not rely on management narrative unless hard turnaround evidence is visible.
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Promoter
90
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
52
watch · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
33
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
30
weak · capital discipline
Results
5
weak · quarterly consistency
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 60.9%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸Promoter holding increased 2.5%.
- ▸4 years of positive FCF.
Trust risks
- ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-47 Cr.
- ▸Altman Z is 1.70.
- ▸3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
- ▸Interest coverage is 1.8x.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Continue researching Sumit Woods Limited
Important announcements & filings
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Open source ↗
Credit rating
Credit-rating report · Sumit Woods Limited has informed the Exchange about Credit Rating
Source: Nse
Investor presentationSep 2025
Investor presentation · Sumit Woods Limited has informed the Exchange about Investor Presentation
Source: Nse
Annual reportMar 2025
Mar 2025 · Annual report · Sumit Woods Limited has informed the Exchange about Communication providing the weblink including exact path for Annual Report of the Company for the financial year ended March 31,
Source: Nse
Credit rating
Credit-rating report · Sumit Woods Limited has informed the Exchange about Credit Rating- Others
Source: Nse
Annual report
Annual Report 2025
Source: Nse
Investor presentationFeb 2025
Investor presentation · Sumit Woods Limited has informed the Exchange about Investor Presentation
Source: Nse
Concall transcriptFeb 2025
Earnings-call transcript · Sumit Woods Limited has informed the Exchange about Transcript
Source: Nse
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.