Skip to content

R.P.P. Infra Projects Limited (RPPINFRA)

Small Cap

Real Estate stocks · Small cap · NSE

R.P.P. Infra Projects Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹47.33
-2.21 · -4.46%
Market cap ₹252 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result01 Aug, 12:34 am IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Real Estate P/E 22.2 (n=72)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

29Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -8.0% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -5.2pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 45
Sector 3M: -10.8% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

RPPINFRAD candles · FIT view-42.1%
Latest close ₹47.33 on 2026-10-21
Bar
-3.4%
RSI
33
MACD hist
-0.18
52W pos
0%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹49.01H ₹49.08L ₹47.05C ₹47.33Vol 40,133 sh
₹45.30₹54.94₹64.58₹74.22₹83.8652L₹47.332026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

RPPINFRANifty RealtyNifty 500
-29%-18%-7%+5%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026RPPINFRA -26.2%Nifty Realty -13.1%Nifty 500 -6.5%
RPPINFRA
-26.2%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Realty
-13.1%
Vs Nifty 500
-19.7 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-63.0%
₹128
52W range position
0%
₹47.1 - ₹128
ATR (14)
5.1%
₹2.4
Volume vs 20D
0.99x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.2 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹47.1 - ₹56.3
37.2% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
16

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue +0.0% · PAT -74.5% YoY

Technical
Bearish
29

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-1294.8%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
51

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -74% YoY · margin compression · Rev +0% YoY

Filed 31 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹347.1 Cr+0.0%-23.1%
EBITDA₹6.2 Cr-67.8%+121.9%
Operating margin1.8%-374 bps+801 bps
PAT₹2.8 Cr-74.5%NDF
PAT margin0.8%-232 bps+371 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
122.00
P/B
0.47
EV/EBITDA
35.70
Market Cap
252.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
1.86%
ROCE
6.43%
ROA
0.39%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
24.00%
EPS 5Y
-9.00%
Revenue 3Y
13.00%
EPS 3Y
-28.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.20
Interest Coverage
0.13×
Altman Z
2.59
Book Value
108.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
9/5
OCF
7.00 Cr
EPS TTM
0.84

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
39.18%
Promoter Pledge
26.80%
Momentum 52W
1%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 347-23.1% vs prev
0451.6Sep 2023: 372Dec 2023: 326Mar 2024: 412Jun 2024: 336Sep 2024: 394Dec 2024: 355Mar 2025: 346Jun 2025: 347Sep 2025: 317Dec 2025: 375Mar 2026: 452Jun 2026: 347Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 2.8+121.1% vs prev
-13.1018.9Sep 2023: 17.0Dec 2023: 16.1Mar 2024: 13.6Jun 2024: 16.5Sep 2024: 18.9Dec 2024: 18.9Mar 2025: 11.7Jun 2025: 10.8Sep 2025: 13.8Dec 2025: 0.7Mar 2026: -13.1Jun 2026: 2.8Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 33.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~8.7% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 33 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

3
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-11.6%
3M return
-26.2%
6M return
-43.9%
1Y return
-60.9%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
-1
Sector rank
#18
Industry rank
#69
Stage evidence
  • Price is 25.5% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -4.1%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 38.41-3.57%
35526986103Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2638
RS vs Nifty 50038

Valuation & peers

U-Score 16 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

16U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation3/30
Growth5/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet3/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
-2
Raw sum
16

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

16/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 5/25 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 3/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Promoter pledge is 26.8%.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 2 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -1294.8%.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
122.0
PB
0.5
EV/EBITDA
35.7
ROE
1.9%
ROCE
6.4%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.2
MoS
-1294.8%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
16
Previous: 16
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-1294.8%
Previous: -1359.9%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹45.18
-4.8% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
4.0
Growth-justified Value
₹3.39
-1294.8% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Real Estate — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
EMAMIREAL
Small
Emami Realty Limited
Real Estate
match 176
17
—
—
—
OVERVALUED
MBLINFRA
Small
MBL Infrastructure Limited
Real Estate
match 175
21
—
-7.2%
—
OVERVALUED
NILAINFRA
Small
Nila Infrastructures Limited
Real Estate
match 175
67
10.6
12.9%
+69%
UNDERVALUED
NIMBSPROJ
Small
Nimbus Projects Limited
Real Estate
match 175
23
—
-18.4%
—
OVERVALUED
RUDRA
Small
Rudra Global Infra Products Limited
Real Estate
match 175
45
11.5
10.4%
+64%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

R.P.P. Infra Projects Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
51Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 9th percentile of the scored universe and 18th percentile within Real Estate. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 10/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
33 docs text-extracted · 6 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
9th percentile

overall median 67 · Real Estate: 18th pctile, median 61 · Small: 10th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

33 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
46
watch · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
59
watch · leverage and solvency
Discipline
10
weak · capital discipline
Results
39
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸FCF yield is 5.6%.
  • ▸10 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸Promoter pledge is elevated at 26.8%.
  • ▸4 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸Interest coverage is 0.1x.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 4.9%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Investor presentationJun 2026

Jun 2026 · PPT

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Award_of_Order_Receipt_of_Order 23 May - RPP Infra received ₹5.13 crore SIPCOT work order for hard rock removal, to be executed in 12 months.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual report

Annual Report For FY 2025-26 To Shareholders Whose Email Ids Are Not Registered 3 Sep

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.