Skip to content

MBL Infrastructure Limited (MBLINFRA)

Small Cap

Real Estate stocks · Small cap · NSE

MBL Infrastructure Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹21.33
-1.04 · -4.65%
Market cap ₹356 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals18 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result24 Jul, 01:38 am IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Real Estate P/E 22.2 (n=72)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

30Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -2.2% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -5.2pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 20
Sector RS: 45
Sector 3M: -10.8% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

MBLINFRAD candles · FIT view-17.9%
Latest close ₹21.33 on 2026-10-21
Bar
-4.7%
RSI
41
MACD hist
-0.12
52W pos
12%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹22.38H ₹22.85L ₹21.25C ₹21.33Vol 23,119 sh
₹19.90₹23.21₹26.52₹29.82₹33.13₹21.332026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

MBLINFRANifty RealtyNifty 500
-20%-12%-4%+4%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026MBLINFRA -15.5%Nifty Realty -13.1%Nifty 500 -6.5%
MBLINFRA
-15.5%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Realty
-13.1%
Vs Nifty 500
-9.0 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-51.3%
₹43.8
52W range position
12%
₹18.4 - ₹43.8
ATR (14)
7.4%
₹1.6
Volume vs 20D
0.34x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.2 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹20.5 - ₹25.9
54.5% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
21

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Average
45

Revenue +35.6% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Bearish
30

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
—

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
58

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 45/100

Rev +36% YoY · margin expansion

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹37.6 Cr+35.6%-28.0%
EBITDA₹10.1 Cr+146.4%+70.0%
Operating margin27.0%+10574 bps+1556 bps
PAT₹-5.2 CrNDFNDF
PAT margin-13.8%+3114 bps+239 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
—
P/B
0.37
EV/EBITDA
18.41
Market Cap
356.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
-7.18%
ROCE
7.74%
ROA
-0.51%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-3.00%
EPS 5Y
1.00%
Revenue 3Y
3.00%
EPS 3Y
-14.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
1.03
Interest Coverage
0.58×
Altman Z
0.70
Book Value
62.70

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
24.44%
FCF Positive Y
7/5
OCF
82.00 Cr
EPS TTM
-1.00

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
74.57%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
21%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 37.5-28.0% vs prev
074.3Sep 2023: 20.9Dec 2023: 32.7Mar 2024: 24.0Jun 2024: 33.8Sep 2024: 33.0Dec 2024: 30.4Mar 2025: 31.2Jun 2025: 27.7Sep 2025: 74.3Dec 2025: 50.7Mar 2026: 52.2Jun 2026: 37.5Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -5.2+38.7% vs prev
-47.50223.8Sep 2023: -11.1Dec 2023: -9.3Mar 2024: -11.3Jun 2024: 224Sep 2024: 23.8Dec 2024: -30.7Mar 2025: -47.5Jun 2025: -12.4Sep 2025: 7.7Dec 2025: -9.4Mar 2026: -8.5Jun 2026: -5.2Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 41.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~2.2% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 41 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 51% off 52W high · 16% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

14
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-2.0%
3M return
-15.5%
6M return
-16.0%
1Y return
-48.9%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
+4
Sector rank
#18
Industry rank
#69
Stage evidence
  • Price is 13.8% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -1.1%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 54.33-3.76%
48637893108Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2654
RS vs Nifty 50054

Valuation & peers

U-Score 21 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

21U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation5/30
Growth3/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet3/15
Cash Flow10/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
21

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

21/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 24.4%.
  • Cash flow contributes 10/10 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 3/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 0.7, in distress territory.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
—
PB
0.4
EV/EBITDA
18.4
ROE
-7.2%
ROCE
7.7%
FCF Yield
24.4%
Debt/Equity
1.0
MoS
—
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
21
Previous: 21
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
—
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
21
21
21
21

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
8.1
Growth-justified Value
—
— MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Real Estate — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
NIMBSPROJ
Small
Nimbus Projects Limited
Real Estate
match 180
23
—
-18.4%
—
OVERVALUED
EMAMIREAL
Small
Emami Realty Limited
Real Estate
match 179
17
—
—
—
OVERVALUED
RPPINFRA
Small
R.P.P. Infra Projects Limited
Real Estate
match 177
16
122.0
1.9%
-1360%
OVERVALUED
NILAINFRA
Small
Nila Infrastructures Limited
Real Estate
match 174
67
10.6
12.9%
+69%
UNDERVALUED
RUDRA
Small
Rudra Global Infra Products Limited
Real Estate
match 173
45
11.5
10.4%
+64%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

MBL Infrastructure Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
58Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 22nd percentile of the scored universe and 38th percentile within Real Estate. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 21/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
43 docs text-extracted · 1 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
22nd percentile

overall median 67 · Real Estate: 38th pctile, median 61 · Small: 25th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

43 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
21
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
43
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 74.6%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 23.2%.
  • ▸7 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸Altman Z is 0.70.
  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 1.03.
  • ▸Interest coverage is 0.6x.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 21 Sep

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Investor presentation

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Investor Presentation 17 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 17 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual report

Reg. 34 (1) Annual Report. 13 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.