IP
IndiaPulse

SJVN Limited (SJVN)

Large Cap

Power stocks · Large cap · NSE

SJVN Limited is a Navratna CPSE, a joint venture of the Govt. of India & Govt. of H.P., engaged in power generation. It operates hydro, thermal, and solar power projects, with a focus on expanding its renewable energy portfolio and transmission lines.

₹65.23
+0.25 · +0.38%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Power P/E 16.6 (n=92)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Verify management risk first
Do not let cheap valuation override weak Trust or governance evidence.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
17

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Weak Trust
48

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bearish
24

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
29

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -1% YoY · margin compression · Rev +52% YoY

Filed 31 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹1,394 Cr+52.0%-6.8%
EBITDA₹850 Cr+20.2%-6.6%
Operating margin61.0%-1600 bps+0 bps
PAT₹225 Cr-1.3%NDF
PAT margin16.1%-872 bps+2403 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-03T18:37:42.521Z
Management commentary snapshot

FY26 revenue increased 22% YoY to INR 3,545 cr, driven by tariff true-up. PAT rose 4% YoY to INR 1,008 cr. Q4 FY26 revenue surged 109% YoY, with PAT up 308% YoY. Total generation increased 25% YoY to 13,302 MU. Company commissioned 1730 MW capacity (1070 MW solar, 660 MW thermal).

While SJVN achieved significant capacity additions and revenue growth, consolidated losses from new thermal and solar plants, coupled with lower PLF/CUF and challenges in converting awarded REIA projects into PPAs, indicate operational and execution stress. The ambitious long-term capacity targets are under review.

Growth engines

Buxar Thermal Power Plant (1320 MW)

First unit of 660 MW commissioned on Nov 14, 2025. Unit 2 (660 MW) synchronized May 8, 2026, commercial operation expected by end of May 2026.

Bikaner Solar Power Project (1000 MW)

Commissioned on December 24, 2025, significantly enhancing SJVNL’s renewable energy portfolio.

Dhaulasidh Hydro Project (69.5 MW)

Significant advancement achieved, targeted for commissioning by March 2027.

Arun-III Hydro Project (900 MW, Nepal)

Considerable progress achieved, including critical electromechanical equipment and transmission logistics. Plan to commission all four units by December 2028.

Capacity and execution

FY26 Capacity Additions

Achieved a total capacity addition of 1730 Megawatt during '25-'26, comprising of 1070 solar and 660 Megawatt of thermal. Total installed capacity stands at 4196 megawatts.

Under Construction Portfolio

Currently constructing four hydro projects (1561.5 MW), second unit of Buxar Thermal (660 MW), and 10 solar projects (1705 MW). Total under construction portfolio is 3926.5 Megawatt.

FY27 Planned Capacity Additions

Capacity addition of Buxar Thermal Unit 2 (660 MW), Dhaulasidh Hydro Electric Project (69.5 MW) by March '27, and around 1,555 Megawatt of solar capacity by March '27.

FY28 Planned Capacity Additions

Plan to add around 650 Megawatts, mainly due to solar projects.

Tailwinds

Government Support for Renewable Energy

Bikaner solar project developed under the CPSU scheme of the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India.

Growing Regional Power Demand

Buxar power plant will supply 85% of its annual generation to the state of Bihar, contributing substantially to meeting the region's growing power demand.

Headwinds

Lower PLF/CUF for New Plants

Buxar Thermal Unit-1 ran at 60% PLF due to low demand and power curtailment by beneficiaries. SGEL experienced 'slightly lower CUF' on some commissioned plants.

Solar Project Curtailment

Bikaner 1000 MW project faces ~120 MW curtailment due to SVR availability issues, expected to be resolved by October 2026. Potential curtailment in Khawada, Gujarat (~300 MW) due to transmission line delays.

Challenges in REIA PPA Conversion

Only 6 GW of PPAs signed out of 16 GW awarded under REIA. Balance pending due to DISCOM demand/configuration mismatch and lower subsequent bid tariffs.

Geological Surprises in Hydro Projects

Arun-III hydro project faced some geological surprises with the dam right bank, requiring time to stabilize the area.

Risk radar

Project Execution and Connectivity Delays

Nepal hydro project faced geological issues and government approval delays. Bikaner solar project's full capacity is impacted by SVR delivery delays. Khawada solar projects face connectivity delays due to transmission lines.

Regulatory Changes Impacting Tax Benefits

Increased tax expenses due to discontinuation of reduction under section 81A of the Income Tax Act 1961 for Rampur Hydropower Station and KWPP.

Market Demand and Curtailment Risk

Buxar Thermal Unit-1 ran below optimal PLF due to low demand and solar power influx. Solar projects face curtailment due to grid balancing requirements and transmission infrastructure.

High Trade Receivables

Trade receivables increased significantly to INR 1,299 crores as of March 31, 2026, including INR 906 crores of unbilled debtors.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is crucial for assessing overall financial performance and generation trends, as power generation can be seasonal. QoQ is relevant for Q4 specific performance and to monitor sequential momentum of new capacity ramp-up and utilization.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Total Generation

Total generation from all power stations stands at 13,302 million units in FY26 as compared to 10,646 million units in FY25, reflecting an increase of 25% YoY.

Nathpa Jhakri Hydro Power Station Generation

Achieved a generation of 7,506 million units in FY26 as compared to 7,421 million units in FY25.

Rampur Hydro Power Station Generation

Recorded a generation of 2,108 million units in FY26 as compared to 2,074 million units in FY25.

Buxar Thermal Power Plant Unit-1 PLF

Buxar Unit-1 has started operating at a PLF of around 60% in Q4 FY26.

Management forward view

Reviewing Long-Term Capacity Targets

Previous projections of 25 GW by 2030 and 50 GW by 2040 are under review due to project delays and market assessment. A new business plan with realistic targets will be shared soon.

Focus on Consolidating Ongoing Projects

Company is trying to consolidate itself with the ongoing projects and will make future projections based on realistic targets.

Expects Buxar Thermal to be Profitable in FY27

Management is 'very much sure' that Buxar Thermal Power plant will generate profit during FY27, after Unit 2 commissioning, stabilization, and running above 70% PLF.

Hopeful for REIA PPA Conversions

Despite challenges, management is hopeful that some pure solar PPAs with attractive tariffs (e.g., 2.53-2.54) may find buyers among DISCOMs.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Buxar Thermal PLF60% for Unit-1 in Q4 FY26Increase above 70% for profitability in FY27, post Unit 2 commissioning and stabilization.
Bikaner Solar Curtailment~120 MW curtailment on 1000 MW projectCommissioning of SVR by October 2026 to resolve curtailment and enable full capacity operation.
REIA PPA Conversion Rate6 GW signed out of 16 GW awardedProgress on converting the remaining 9 GW of awarded capacity into Power Sale Agreements.
Trade ReceivablesINR 1,299 crores as of March 31, 2026Reduction in outstanding receivables and timely billing and realization, especially for unbilled debtors.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

24Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -4.3% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low

Stock trend: 24
Sector RS:

Technical chart

SJVNdaily · 1Y · AUTO-10.2%
Latest close ₹65.23 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.3%
RSI
38
MACD hist
0.04
52W pos
7%
2026-09-04O ₹65.05H ₹65.55L ₹64.75C ₹65.23Vol 12.6L sh
₹62.02₹67.52₹73.01₹78.50₹84.0052L65.232026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 38. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~4.4% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 38 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

11
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-4.0%
3M return
-10.4%
6M return
-9.8%
1Y return
-30.9%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
-1
Sector rank
#17
Industry rank
#26
Stage evidence
  • Price is 9.0% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -1.5%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 64.61+0.39%
62728292102Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2665
RS vs Nifty 50065

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 17 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

17U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation1/30
Growth7/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet1/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
17

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

17/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 7/25 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 1/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.1, in distress territory.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -1517.3%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
40.1
PB
1.8
EV/EBITDA
12.8
ROE
4.6%
ROCE
5.7%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
2.3
MoS
-1517.3%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
17
Previous: 17
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-1517.3%
Previous: -1517.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
21
21
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹36.32
-79.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
2.5
Growth-justified Value
₹4.03
-1517.3% MoS
PEG

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
48Weak Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Weak Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 5th percentile of the scored universe and 7th percentile within Power. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 22/100.

Mixed Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 81.9%. Key concern: Debt/equity is 2.27.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
62 docs text-extracted · 50 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Weak Trust

Management or financial behaviour needs caution. Demand stronger valuation compensation.

Relative rank
5th percentile

overall median 67 · Power: 7th pctile, median 65 · Large: 3rd pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

62 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Weak Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
22
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
28
weak · capital discipline
Results
29
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 81.9%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 7 years of positive FCF.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • Debt/equity is 2.27.
  • Altman Z is 1.10.
  • 2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ROCE is low at 5.7%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
40.10
P/B
1.80
EV/EBITDA
12.81
Market Cap
25634.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
4.58%
ROCE
5.73%
ROA
1.23%
Dividend Y
2.30%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
13.00%
EPS 5Y
-19.00%
Revenue 3Y
16.00%
EPS 3Y
-22.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
2.27
Interest Coverage
2.41×
Altman Z
1.10
Book Value
36.20

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
7/5
OCF
1860.00 Cr
EPS TTM
1.62

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
81.85%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
7%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Power, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.