Skip to content

Silky Overseas Ltd. (SILKY)

SME Cap

Consumer stocks · SME cap · NSE

Delhi-based manufacturer of premium home furnishing products, established in 2016. A large-scale listed organized manufacturer in the predominantly unorganized mink blanket industry, operating under the 'Rian Décor' brand. Listed on NSE Emerge in July 2025.

₹68.2
+0.35 · +0.52%
Market cap ₹42.2 Cr
ThemesTextiles
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals05 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 12:49 am IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

36Bearish

SMA20 -2.8% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector -3.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 37
Sector RS: 36
Sector 3M: -9.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

SILKYD candles · FIT view-49.1%
Latest close ₹68.20 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-2.5%
RSI
47
MACD hist
0.40
52W pos
7%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹69.95H ₹69.95L ₹66.50C ₹68.20Vol 4,800 sh
₹56.92₹79.35₹101.78₹124.21₹146.6452L₹68.202026-06VolRSIMACD2026-052026-072026-082026-102026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

SILKYNifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
-17%-8%+1%+9%20 Jul2 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026SILKY -10.3%Nifty Consumer Durabl… -9.7%Nifty 500 -5.6%
SILKY
-10.3%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Consumer Durables
-9.7%
Vs Nifty 500
-4.7 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-60.1%
₹171
52W range position
7%
₹61 - ₹171
ATR (14)
7.3%
₹5
Volume vs 20D
0.74x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹61 - ₹80.9
60.6% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Investable fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Good U-Score but weak results consistency: verify latest quarters.

Suggested next step
Add to watchlist
Fundamental setup is interesting, but technical confirmation is weak.
U-Score
Legacy · UNDERVALUED
70

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -32.1% · PAT -71.3% YoY

Technical
Bearish
36

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+73.1%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
57

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -32% YoY · PAT -71% YoY · margin compression · +37% QoQ

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹17.1 Cr-32.1%+37.1%
EBITDA₹2.3 Cr-37.5%+700.0%
Operating margin13.5%-115 bps+1122 bps
PAT₹0.8 Cr-71.3%NDF
PAT margin4.7%-643 bps+961 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
8.69
P/B
0.73
EV/EBITDA
4.85
Market Cap
42.20Cr

Profitability

ROE
16.20%
ROCE
17.90%
ROA
5.26%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
29.00%
EPS 5Y
29.00%
Revenue 3Y
16.00%
EPS 3Y
87.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.42
Interest Coverage
4.98×
Altman Z
3.26
Book Value
91.30

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
3/5
OCF
-17.56 Cr
EPS TTM
7.61

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
60.53%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
5%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 17.1+37.1% vs prev
048.2Jun 2024: 21.1Sep 2024: 48.2Dec 2024: 31.0Mar 2025: 23.7Jun 2025: 25.3Sep 2025: 37.9Dec 2025: 32.1Mar 2026: 12.5Jun 2026: 17.1Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 0.8+232.8% vs prev
-0.603.9Jun 2024: 1.6Sep 2024: 3.9Dec 2024: 3.3Mar 2025: 2.6Jun 2025: 2.8Sep 2025: 2.3Dec 2025: 2.4Mar 2026: -0.6Jun 2026: 0.8Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 47. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~2.9% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 47 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 59% off 52W high · 12% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

3
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-2.5%
3M return
-35.0%
6M return
-51.3%
1Y return
-58.0%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
+1
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#36
Stage evidence
  • Price is 38.3% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -8.2%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
190 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 61.11+1.56%
5075101127152Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2661
RS vs Nifty 50061

Valuation & peers

U-Score 70 · legacy U-Score band UNDERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

70U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · UNDERVALUED
Valuation30/30
Growth22/25
Quality10/20
Balance Sheet10/15
Cash Flow2/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
70

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

70/100 · legacy band UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 73.1%.
  • Valuation contributes 30/30 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 22/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 2/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 10/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
8.7
PB
0.7
EV/EBITDA
4.8
ROE
16.2%
ROCE
17.9%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.4
MoS
+73.1%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE. Current PE is low at 8.7, so peak-cycle earnings risk should be checked.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
70
Previous: 70
Legacy U-Score band
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+73.1%
Previous: +73.1%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹125.03
+45.5% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
33.3
Growth-justified Value
₹253.41
+73.1% MoS
PEG
0.19

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
PARAMOUNT
SME
Paramount Dye Tec Ltd.
Textiles
match 87
34
4.1
10.1%
-468%
WATCHLIST
NAMAN
SME
Naman Industries Proxima Ltd.
Textiles
match 85
20
—
-3.0%
—
OVERVALUED
EASTSILK
Small
Eastern Silk Industries Limited
Textiles
match 85
60
0.7
15.6%
+71%
UNDERVALUED
NEELAM
SME
Neelam Linens and Garments (India) Ltd.
Textiles
match 85
41
8.5
3.9%
+74%
WATCHLIST
CEDAAR
SME
Cedaar Textile Ltd.
Textiles
match 85
4
—
-124.0%
—
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-10-01T00:50:06.886Z
Management commentary snapshot

9M FY26 revenue declined YoY, but EBITDA and PAT showed modest YoY growth with margin expansion. Q3 FY26 saw sequential revenue and EBITDA decline, while PAT improved.

Despite a YoY revenue decline for 9M FY26, the company demonstrated profit growth and margin expansion, indicating improved operational efficiency. Strategic initiatives in e-commerce, exports, and logistics are underway, supported by favorable industry tailwinds. However, the sequential decline in Q3 revenue and EBITDA warrants close monitoring.

Current business mix

Revenue by Product Category (FY2025)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 4 reported categories.

Businessmix
Semi - Finish Goods33.8%
Blankets30.9%
Trading24.9%
Other Manufacturing9.9%
Growth engines

E-commerce Expansion

Targeting 10-15% e-commerce revenue contribution to total sales in next 2-3 years from current 3%.

International Export Expansion

Successful UAE shipment completed; expansion into Middle East markets underway with 15-20% price premium over domestic B2B.

Product Portfolio Expansion

Strengthening product mix with premium and super-soft blanket variants positioned at the higher end of the price range for improved realizations and margins.

Logistics Network Expansion

Added three new warehouses in Jaipur, Ahmedabad, and Lucknow for faster deliveries (1-2 days) and expanded regional coverage.

Capacity and execution

Land Acquisition for Future Capacity

2 acres land acquired in Panipat with an investment of ₹15 Cr for future production capacity.

Operational Enhancements

Shed construction completed as per planned timelines, enhancing order leading to improved efficiency.

Tailwinds

Global Mink Blanket Market Growth

Expected CAGR of 7.5% (2025-2030) for the global mink blanket segment.

India Home Textile Market Growth

India home textile market expected to grow at a CAGR of 10.00% (2026-2033).

India E-commerce Penetration

E-commerce growing faster than traditional retail channels with a CAGR of 19.13% (2026-2034).

Rising Disposable Incomes

Rising disposable incomes in emerging markets fueling demand for luxury and premium comfort.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

The home furnishing business can be seasonal, making YoY comparison for 9M results relevant. QoQ comparison is useful to track sequential momentum, especially given the Q3 decline in revenue and EBITDA.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Capacity Utilization

Current utilization is 68.16% (FY2024-25 production of 4260.16 MT against 6250 MT annual installed capacity).

E-commerce Margins

Direct-to-consumer model enables superior margins (14-15%) compared to normal B2B (8-8.5%), offering a structural margin uplift of 5%.

Market Leadership

Company claims to be a market leader in 1.6 kg single bed mink blankets.

Production Cycle

Production cycle from raw material to finished goods is 10-15 days.

Management forward view

Cost Optimization Programs

Actively pursuing incentives under ETP, HSIP, and ATUFS schemes, expected to yield ₹30-50 lakh annual cost savings.

Strategic Partnership Achievement

Onboarded as a supplier for Myntra’s AURA brand.

D2C Margin Uplift

Management expects a structural margin uplift of 5% driven by the manufacturer-to-consumer model.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
E-commerce Contribution to Sales3%Progress towards the target of 10-15% in the next 2-3 years.
Capacity Utilization68.16%Ramp-up in utilization following land acquisition and operational enhancements.
International Export ExpansionSuccessful UAE shipment completedFurther expansion into Middle East markets and its revenue contribution.
Realization of Government IncentivesExpected ₹30-50 lakh annual cost savingsActual realization of cost savings from ETP, HSIP, and ATUFS schemes.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Trust Score
57Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 20th percentile of the scored universe and 22nd percentile within Consumer. Main check: results consistency is weak at 15/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
2 docs text-extracted · 1 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
20th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 22nd pctile, median 66 · SME: 21st pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

2 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
40
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
81
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
58
watch · capital discipline
Results
15
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 60.5%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.

Trust risks

  • ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-18 Cr.
  • ▸4 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸ROCE trend is -12.1%.
  • ▸1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
Annual reportSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Updates 25 Aug - Annual report FY2025-26 dispatched; AGM on September 21, 2026 with remote e-voting dates.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Annual Report 2026

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationFeb 2026

Feb 2026 · PPT

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Concall transcriptJan 2026

Jan 2026 · Transcript

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2025

Mar 2025 · Annual Report 2025

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.