Skip to content

P. E. Analytics Ltd. (PROPEQUITY)

SME Cap

Real Estate stocks · SME cap · NSE

P. E. Analytics Ltd. operates in Real Estate Analytics, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹187
+0.00 · +0.00%
Market cap ₹203 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 01:07 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 01:07 pm IST
Base fundamentals20 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result20 May, 10:16 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Real Estate P/E 22.2 (n=72)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

35Bearish

SMA20 -9.7% / mo · MACD − · sector -5.5pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 29
Sector RS: 43
Sector 3M: -11.5% vs Nifty 500 -6.0%

Latest FPI flow is positive, but a second consecutive positive fortnight is still required. View sector evidence

Technical chart

PROPEQUITYD candles · FIT view-10.5%
Latest close ₹187.00 on 2026-10-09
Bar
+0.0%
RSI
39
MACD hist
-1.30
52W pos
34%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-09O ₹187.00H ₹187.00L ₹187.00C ₹187.00Vol 1,200 sh
₹179.80₹202.90₹226.00₹249.10₹272.2052H₹187.00VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-072026-092026-10
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

PROPEQUITYNifty RealtyNifty 500
-22%-12%-3%+7%9 Jul21 Aug9 Oct9 Oct 2026PROPEQUITY -18.3%Nifty Realty -11.4%Nifty 500 -5.3%
PROPEQUITY
-18.3%
Nifty 500
-5.3%
Nifty Realty
-11.4%
Vs Nifty 500
-13.0 pp
Chart stats
9 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-30.2%
₹268
52W range position
34%
₹145 - ₹268
ATR (14)
5.1%
₹9.5
Volume vs 20D
0.38x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.1 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹184 - ₹230
67.4% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Investable fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · UNDERVALUED
66

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Good
65

Revenue +13.6% · PAT +14.3% YoY

Technical
Bearish
35

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+62.5%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
86

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Good · 65/100

Rev +14% YoY · PAT +14% YoY · margin expansion · +14% QoQ

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹25 Cr+13.6%+13.6%
EBITDA₹8 CrNDF+33.3%
Operating margin33.0%NDF+400 bps
PAT₹8 Cr+14.3%+14.3%
PAT margin32.0%NDF+18 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
13.00
P/B
1.87
EV/EBITDA
14.50
Market Cap
203.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
16.10%
ROCE
21.30%
ROA
13.11%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
16.00%
EPS 5Y
16.00%
Revenue 3Y
17.00%
EPS 3Y
15.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
—
Altman Z
8.16
Book Value
100.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
6.90%
FCF Positive Y
5/5
OCF
11.00 Cr
EPS TTM
14.97

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
72.26%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
34%

Financial History

Updated 18/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 25.0+13.6% vs prev
025.0Sep 2021: 11.0Mar 2022: 13.0Sep 2022: 14.0Mar 2023: 15.0Sep 2023: 18.0Mar 2024: 22.0Sep 2024: 23.0Mar 2025: 22.0Sep 2025: 22.0Mar 2026: 25.0Q2 21FY22Q2 22FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 8.0+14.3% vs prev
08.0Sep 2021: 4.0Mar 2022: 5.0Sep 2022: 5.0Mar 2023: 5.0Sep 2023: 5.0Mar 2024: 7.0Sep 2024: 7.0Mar 2025: 6.0Sep 2025: 7.0Mar 2026: 8.0Q2 21FY22Q2 22FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 39. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~10.7% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 39 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 30% off 52W high · 29% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

64
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-15.0%
3M return
-25.2%
6M return
+16.9%
1Y return
-
RS 1D
+7
RS 20D
-3
Sector rank
#18
Industry rank
#71
Stage evidence
  • Price is 8.0% below the 30-week proxy without full trend alignment.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +1.5% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Partial-history RS: the 3M and 6M weights are re-normalised because 12M history is unavailable.
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
173 observations
09 Oct 2026Value 95.3-1.15%
7589103116130Sept 25Jan 26Jun 26Oct 2695
RS vs Nifty 50095

Valuation & peers

U-Score 66 · legacy U-Score band UNDERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

66U-SCORE
Financial Turnaround

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · UNDERVALUED
Valuation17/30
Growth16/25
Quality13/20
Balance Sheet10/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
66

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

66/100 · legacy band UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 6.9%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 62.5%.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Valuation is weaker at 17/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 16/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Real estate valuation: NAV, pre-sales, debt, and inventory quality

Real estate valuation depends more on project economics and balance sheet than simple PE.

Real Estate NAV
Primary lens
NAV and market cap versus project pipeline and pre-sales.
Secondary checks
Inventory age, net debt, collections, execution record.
Main risk check
Book value can overstate value if inventory is slow or debt is high.
PE
13.0
PB
1.9
EV/EBITDA
14.5
ROE
16.1%
ROCE
21.3%
FCF Yield
6.9%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+62.5%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
66
Previous: 66
Legacy U-Score band
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+62.5%
Previous: +62.5%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹183.53
-1.9% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
33.3
Growth-justified Value
₹498.5
+62.5% MoS
PEG
0.83

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Real Estate — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
ACTIVEINFR
SME
Active Infrastructures Ltd.
Real Estate
match 9
23
25.4
8.8%
+24%
OVERVALUED
MADHAVIPL
Small
Madhav Infra Projects Limited
Real Estate
match 9
66
7.5
10.7%
+78%
UNDERVALUED
SHRADHA
Small
Shradha Realty Limited
Real Estate
match 7
64
8.9
7.0%
+74%
UNDERVALUED
HBESD
Small
HB Estate Developers Limited
Real Estate
match 7
54
14.0
6.4%
+59%
FAIR VALUE
VR
SME
V R Infraspace Ltd.
Real Estate
match 7
36
21.7
10.2%
+35%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

P. E. Analytics Ltd. operates in Real Estate Analytics, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
86Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 99th percentile of the scored universe and 99th percentile within Real Estate. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
13 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
99th percentile

overall median 67 · Real Estate: 99th pctile, median 61 · SME: 100th pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

13 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
90
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
88
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
82
strong · capital discipline
Results
77
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 72.3%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸Promoter holding increased 5.1%.
  • ▸FCF yield is 5.7%.

Trust risks

  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 16%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

10 shown
Annual reportSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Shareholders meeting 4 Sep - Annual Report 2025-26 submitted; 19th AGM scheduled for 28 September 2026 via video conferencing.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationAug 2026

Aug 2026 · PPT

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationMay 2026

May 2026 · PPT

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationMay 2026

May 2026 · PPT

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Annual Report 2026

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationJan 2026

Jan 2026 · PPT

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationNov 2025

Nov 2025 · PPT

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationAug 2025

Aug 2025 · PPT

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2025

Mar 2025 · Annual Report 2025

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationFeb 2025

Feb 2025 · PPT

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.