Skip to content

Precision Metaliks Ltd. (PRECISION)

SME Cap

Auto stocks · SME cap · NSE

Precision Metaliks Ltd. operates in Metal Components, within the Auto sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹6.55
-0.30 · -4.38%
Market cap ₹15 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 20 Oct, 03:50 pm IST
Details
Quote20 Oct, 03:50 pm IST
Base fundamentals20 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result01 Jun, 08:22 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage12/14 · 86%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Auto P/E 25.7 (n=127)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

33Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -11.8% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector -2.5pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 26
Sector RS: 43
Sector 3M: -7.5% vs Nifty 500 -5.0%
Auto FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

PRECISIOND candles · FIT view-18.1%
Latest close ₹6.55 on 2026-10-16
Bar
+0.0%
RSI
43
MACD hist
0.05
52W pos
5%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-16O ₹6.55H ₹6.55L ₹6.55C ₹6.55Vol 4,000 sh
₹5.65₹6.49₹7.32₹8.16₹9.0052L₹6.55VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-072026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

PRECISIONNifty AutoNifty 500
-12%+3%+19%+34%16 Jul25 Aug16 Oct16 Oct 2026PRECISION -1.5%Nifty Auto -3.7%Nifty 500 -4.2%
PRECISION
-1.5%
Nifty 500
-4.2%
Nifty Auto
-3.7%
Vs Nifty 500
+2.7 pp
Chart stats
16 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-74.8%
₹26
52W range position
4%
₹5.8 - ₹26
ATR (14)
5.1%
₹0.3
Volume vs 20D
0.17x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹5.8 - ₹7.4
50.9% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Verify management risk first
Do not let cheap valuation override weak Trust or governance evidence.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
7

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -100.0% · PAT -170.2% YoY

Technical
Bearish
33

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
—

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
40

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -100% YoY · PAT -170% YoY

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹0 Cr-100.0%-100.0%
EBITDA₹-4.4 CrNDF+20.4%
Operating marginNDFNDFNDF
PAT₹-3.3 Cr-170.2%NDF
PAT marginNDFNDFNDF

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
—
P/B
0.19
EV/EBITDA
—
Market Cap
15.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
-11.20%
ROCE
-5.68%
ROA
-5.37%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-27.00%
EPS 5Y
3.00%
Revenue 3Y
-62.00%
EPS 3Y
-47.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.02
Interest Coverage
-2.87×
Altman Z
0.58
Book Value
34.10

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
1/5
OCF
-41.47 Cr
EPS TTM
-4.06

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
41.51%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
5%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 10.5-91.8% vs prev
0195.8Mar 2019: 0.0Mar 2020: 22.2Mar 2021: 49.2Mar 2022: 126Mar 2023: 189Mar 2024: 196Mar 2025: 127Mar 2026: 10.5FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -9.3-1278.5% vs prev
-9.307.1Mar 2019: 0.0Mar 2020: 0.8Mar 2021: 1.5Mar 2022: 3.5Mar 2023: 7.1Mar 2024: 6.8Mar 2025: 0.8Mar 2026: -9.3FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: -11.9-1421.1% vs prev
-11.9014.8Mar 2019: 0.0%Mar 2020: 7.8%Mar 2021: 9.7%Mar 2022: 8.5%Mar 2023: 14.8%Mar 2024: 7.8%Mar 2025: 0.9%Mar 2026: -11.9%FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 43.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~13.4% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 43 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 67% off 52W high · 13% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

5
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-3.7%
3M return
-3.7%
6M return
-22.0%
1Y return
-69.8%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
+3
Sector rank
#3
Industry rank
#30
Stage evidence
  • Price is 15.2% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -4.8%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
neutral
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
231 observations
16 Oct 2026Value 34.83-4.78%
28486787106Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2635
RS vs Nifty 50035

Valuation & peers

U-Score 7 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

7U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation5/30
Growth4/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet5/15
Cash Flow0/10
Piotroski
2/9 (+0)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
7

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

7/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Balance sheet contributes 5/15 to the score.
  • Valuation contributes 5/30 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 4/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 0.6, in distress territory.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
—
PB
0.2
EV/EBITDA
—
ROE
-11.2%
ROCE
-5.7%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
—
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
7
Previous: 7
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
—
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
9.8
Growth-justified Value
—
— MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Auto — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
MANDEEP
SME
Mandeep Auto Industries Ltd.
Auto Components
match 135
34
15.9
3.3%
-825%
WATCHLIST
ITTL
SME
Innovative Tyres & Tubes Ltd.
Auto Components
match 121
18
—
—
—
OVERVALUED
AVATAR
SME
AVATAR Industries Limited
Auto Components
match 121
25
612.0
1.1%
-1388%
OVERVALUED
BIKEWO
SME
Bikewo Green Tech Ltd.
Auto Components
match 120
28
50.3
8.1%
-28%
OVERVALUED
PREMIUM
SME
Premium Plast Ltd.
Auto Components
match 120
32
55.1
14.5%
-43%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Precision Metaliks Ltd. operates in Metal Components, within the Auto sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
40Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 1st percentile of the scored universe and 1st percentile within Auto. Main check: results consistency is weak at 5/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
1st percentile

overall median 67 · Auto: 1st pctile, median 74 · SME: 1st pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Do not rely on management narrative unless hard turnaround evidence is visible.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
28
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
62
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
22
weak · capital discipline
Results
5
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.02.

Trust risks

  • ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-41 Cr.
  • ▸Altman Z is 0.58.
  • ▸4 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸Only 1 years of positive FCF.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

1 shown
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.