Annual reportSep 2026
Sep 2026 · General Updates 3 Sep - Mandeep Auto announces 3rd AGM on 24 September 2026 and dispatches FY26 annual report.
Source: Nse
Mandeep Auto Industries Ltd. (MANDEEP)
SME CapAuto stocks · SME cap · NSE
Mandeep Auto Industries Ltd. operates in Precision Components, within the Auto sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
₹17.1
+0.00 · +0.00%
Market cap ₹19.6 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm ISTDetails
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals20 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result01 Jun, 08:22 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Auto P/E 25.7 (n=127)
Technical timing lens
Trend score and candlestick chart
42NeutralSMA20 -5.5% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector -2.2pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)
Stock trend: 41
Sector RS: 44
Sector 3M: -7.8% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Auto FPI tailwindNot confirmed
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Technical chart
MANDEEPD candles · FIT view-21.9%Latest close ₹17.10 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-5.0%
RSI
39
MACD hist
0.01
52W pos
9%
2026-10-19O ₹18.00H ₹18.00L ₹17.10C ₹17.10Vol 6,000 sh
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context
Relative performance and chart statistics
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
MANDEEPNifty AutoNifty 500
- MANDEEP
- -10.7%
- Nifty 500
- -4.7%
- Nifty Auto
- -6.4%
- Vs Nifty 500
- -6.0 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026- From 52W high
- -46.4%
- 52W range position
- 6%
- ATR (14)
- 3.4%
- Volume vs 20D
- 0.65x
- Avg traded value
- ₹0 Cr
- 20D price channel
- ₹17 - ₹18.7
₹31.9
₹16.2 - ₹31.9
₹0.6
Latest completed session
20-session average
38.2% annualized volatility
Research snapshot
What the evidence says now
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.
Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · WATCHLIST34
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Latest result
Bad2
Revenue +20.5% · PAT -45.0% YoY
Technical
Neutral42
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Valuation
Legacy model-825.1%
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Trust
Limited evidence61
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Latest result
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Bad · 2/100PAT -45% YoY · margin compression · Rev +21% YoY · +18% QoQ
Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹20.1 Cr | +20.5% | +18.0% |
| EBITDA | ₹1.5 Cr | NDF | +101.3% |
| Operating margin | 7.5% | NDF | +312 bps |
| PAT | ₹0.8 Cr | -45.0% | +148.5% |
| PAT margin | 4.1% | NDF | +214 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 15.90
- P/B
- 0.48
- EV/EBITDA
- 7.03
- Market Cap
- 19.60Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 3.28%
- ROCE
- 4.63%
- ROA
- 2.36%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 22.59%
- EPS 5Y
- -26.52%
- Revenue 3Y
- 7.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 7.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.05
- Interest Coverage
- 14.00×
- Altman Z
- 3.55
- Book Value
- 35.70
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 0/5
- OCF
- 1.93 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 1.01
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 67.04%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 8%
Financial History
Updated 21/10/2026
Revenue
₹ CrLatest: 20.1+18.0% vs prev
Net Profit
₹ CrLatest: 0.8+148.5% vs prev
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Daily technical trend read
Bearish setupTrend is weak — long-term trend unclear. RSI 39.
- SMA20 falling (~5.8% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 39 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
- 37% off 52W high · 6% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Nifty 500 leadership
Relative Strength & Trend Stage
33
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-6.0%
3M return
-16.6%
6M return
-23.3%
1Y return
-
RS 1D
-6
RS 20D
+5
Sector rank
#5
Industry rank
#30
Stage evidence
- Price is 16.1% below the 30-week proxy.
- The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -6.7%.
- Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
weakening
Partial-history RS: the 3M and 6M weights are re-normalised because 12M history is unavailable.
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
149 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 62.21-4.41%
RS vs Nifty 50062
Valuation & peers
U-Score 34 · legacy U-Score band WATCHLIST · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Valuation & peers
U-Score 34 · legacy U-Score band WATCHLIST · valuation evidence and comparable companies
WATCHLIST
Fundamental score breakdown
U band · WATCHLISTValuation15/30
Growth6/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet14/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
34
Why this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
34/100 · legacy band WATCHLIST
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
- Balance sheet contributes 14/15 to the score.
- Valuation contributes 15/30 to the score.
Main drags
- Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
- Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -825.1%.
- Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model
Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium
Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
15.9
PB
0.5
EV/EBITDA
7.0
ROE
3.3%
ROCE
4.6%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
-825.1%
Score movement
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
34
Previous: 34
Legacy U-Score band
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
-825.1%
Previous: -825.1%
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
32
32
32
32
31
32
32
32
32
32
34
34
Factor attribution
No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Modelled fair value
Graham Number
₹28.48
+40.0% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
1.8
Growth-justified Value
₹1.85
-825.1% MoS
PEG
—
Comparable companies
Peers
Business-comparable peers in Auto — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
OBSCP
SME
OBSC Perfection Ltd.
Auto Components
match 150
39
64.3
19.6%
-63%
WATCHLIST
SANSERA
Micro
Sansera Engineering Limited
Auto Components
match 144
35
69.0
11.8%
-92%
WATCHLIST
PRECISION
SME
Precision Metaliks Ltd.
Auto Components
match 135
7
—
-11.2%
—
OVERVALUED
DELTIC
SME
Delta Autocorp Ltd.
Auto Components
match 122
35
8.9
8.1%
-14%
WATCHLIST
PREMIUM
SME
Premium Plast Ltd.
Auto Components
match 122
32
55.1
14.5%
-43%
WATCHLIST
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business and thesis
Issuer presentation review pending
Mandeep Auto Industries Ltd. operates in Precision Components, within the Auto sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trust Score
61Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 32nd percentile of the scored universe and 16th percentile within Auto. Main check: results consistency is weak at 31/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
Relative rank
32nd percentile
overall median 67 · Auto: 16th pctile, median 74 · SME: 36th pctile, median 64
Evidence depth
Financial-only
0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
Claim delivery
Outcome history still building
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Limited evidence · low confidenceWhat it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Promoter
90
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
43
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
31
weak · quarterly consistency
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 67%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸Promoter holding increased 3.5%.
- ▸Debt/equity is 0.05.
Trust risks
- ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
- ▸Only 0 years of positive FCF.
- ▸ROCE is low at 4.4%.
- ▸ROE is low at 3.1%.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Continue researching Mandeep Auto Industries Ltd.
Important announcements & filings
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Open source ↗
Annual report
Annual Report 2026
Source: Nse
Annual report
Annual Report 2025
Source: Nse
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.