IP
IndiaPulse

NTPC Green Energy Limited (NTPCGREEN)

Large Cap

Power stocks · Large cap · NSE

NTPC Green Energy Limited operates in the Power sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹89.36
+0.63 · +0.71%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Power P/E 16.6 (n=92)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
22

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Weak Trust
52

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bearish
22

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
60

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Good · 62/100

Rev +63% YoY · PAT +39% YoY · +21% QoQ · margin compression

Filed 22 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹1,107 Cr+62.8%+21.3%
EBITDA₹989 Cr+63.7%+27.8%
Operating margin89.0%+0 bps+400 bps
PAT₹305 Cr+38.6%+54.8%
PAT margin27.6%-480 bps+597 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

NTPC Green Energy Limited operates in the Power sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

22Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -1.5% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 22
Sector RS:

Technical chart

NTPCGREENdaily · 1Y · AUTO+2.3%
Latest close ₹89.36 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.7%
RSI
38
MACD hist
-0.18
52W pos
15%
2026-09-04O ₹88.74H ₹89.50L ₹88.65C ₹89.36Vol 13.7L sh
₹83.25₹92.86₹102.47₹112.09₹121.7052H52L89.362026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 38.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~1.5% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 38 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 26% off 52W high · 6% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

23
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-2.3%
3M return
-11.0%
6M return
-8.5%
1Y return
-15.2%
RS 1D
-6
RS 20D
-9
Sector rank
#17
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 7.9% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +0.2% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 84.46+0.70%
798998107116Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2684
RS vs Nifty 50084

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 22 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

22U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth17/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet0/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
22

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

22/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Growth contributes 17/25 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 1/10 to the score.
  • Valuation contributes 0/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.7, in distress territory.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -406.9%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
124.0
PB
4.0
EV/EBITDA
26.4
ROE
2.8%
ROCE
3.6%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
1.7
MoS
-406.9%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
22
Previous: 22
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-406.9%
Previous: -406.9%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +1 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
20
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
22

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹18.96
-371.3% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
24.8
Growth-justified Value
₹17.63
-406.9% MoS
PEG
3.08

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
52Weak Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Weak Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 10th percentile of the scored universe and 14th percentile within Power. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 35/100.

Mixed Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 89%. Key concern: Altman Z is 1.66.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
9 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Weak Trust

Management or financial behaviour needs caution. Demand stronger valuation compensation.

Relative rank
10th percentile

overall median 67 · Power: 14th pctile, median 65 · Large: 5th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

9 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Weak Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
43
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
35
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
38
weak · capital discipline
Results
60
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 89%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • Altman Z is 1.66.
  • Only 0 years of positive FCF.
  • Debt/equity is 1.67.
  • ROCE is low at 3.6%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
124.00
P/B
3.97
EV/EBITDA
26.43
Market Cap
75298.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
2.79%
ROCE
3.56%
ROA
1.00%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
168.35%
EPS 5Y
37.20%
Revenue 3Y
156.00%
EPS 3Y
45.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
1.67
Interest Coverage
2.78×
Altman Z
1.66
Book Value
22.50

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
0/5
OCF
2386.00 Cr
EPS TTM
0.71

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
89.01%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
15%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Power, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.