IP
IndiaPulse

The New India Assurance Company Limited (NIACL)

Large Cap

Financial Services stocks · Large cap · NSE

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. is an Indian multinational general insurance company with 107 years of operation, a strong brand image, and presence in 24 countries. It operates 1,668 offices in India and holds a AAA rating by CRISIL.

₹229.91
+34.58 · +17.70%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage11/14 · 79%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Financial Services P/E 18.5 (n=240)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, while price trend supports entry. This looks more like momentum/speculation than a clean fundamental investment setup.

Suggested next step
Momentum only
Trend is strong but fundamentals do not support a clean investment thesis.
Weak U-Score but strong trend: momentum may be ahead of fundamentals.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
13

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
57

low confidence · 2/6 claims checked

Technical
Bullish
78

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
mixed
53

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -159% YoY · margin compression · Rev +2% YoY

Filed 24 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹11,900 Cr+1.5%-5.1%
EBITDA₹-205 Cr-208.5%-1178.9%
Operating margin-1.7%-330 bps-180 bps
PAT₹-239 Cr-159.4%-141.2%
PAT margin-2.0%-544 bps-663 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-03T18:16:12.805Z
Management commentary snapshot

NIACL reported robust FY26 PAT growth of 40% YoY to Rs. 1,384 Cr, driven by better investment returns, despite a higher combined ratio of 122.57% and significant wage revision impact. Gross Written Premium grew 8.15% YoY, with Indian business outpacing industry growth.

While PAT growth was strong due to investment income, core underwriting profitability remains a concern with a combined ratio of 122.57% and negative underwriting results. The impact of wage revisions and persistent issues in Motor TP segment's incurred claim ratio highlight structural challenges. Market share gains are positive, but sustainability depends on improving underwriting performance.

Current business mix

Gross Written Premium by Segment (FY26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 7 reported categories.

Businessmix
Health & PA47.6%
Fire14.6%
Motor TP14.1%
Motor OD11.7%
Others9.3%
Marine2.4%
Crop0.3%
Growth engines

Indian Business Growth

Domestic gross direct premium income grew by 10.9% in FY26, outpacing the general insurance industry growth of 9.3%.

Market Share Gains

YoY market share in the Indian business increased from 12.56% to 12.74% in FY26.

Retail and MSME Focus

Management is optimistic about FY27 growth prospects with a strong focus on retail and MSME segments.

New Product Launches

Company is launching innovative new products and entering new lines like parametric insurance.

Capacity and execution

Domestic Presence

Operates 1,668 offices in India, underlining strong domestic presence.

Tailwinds

Better Investment Returns

Adverse impact of wage revision was partially offset by better investment returns during FY26.

Health Segment Improvement

The Health segment witnessed an improvement in loss ratio during FY26.

Headwinds

Wage Revision Impact

Absorbed full impact of wage revision and family pension amounting to Rs. 3525 Cr during FY26, with Rs. 597 Cr in Q4.

Motor TP Premium Stagnation

Incurred claim ratio impacted by higher loss ratio in Motor Third Party segment where premium revision has not yet happened.

Aviation Segment Loss

Unfortunate loss in the aviation segment contributed to higher incurred claim ratio in FY26.

Competitive Motor Segment

Motor segment performance was impacted by the intense competitive environment.

Risk radar

Underwriting Losses

Underwriting results were negative at Rs. (8,882) Cr for FY26, impacted by wage arrears and retirement benefits.

High Combined Ratio

Combined ratio for FY26 was 122.57%, indicating that claims and expenses exceed premiums earned.

Motor TP Profitability

Lack of premium revision in Motor TP segment continues to impact profitability and incurred claim ratio.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

The presentation provides both annual (FY26 vs FY25) and quarterly (Q4 FY26 vs Q4 FY25) results. Annual comparison is crucial for overall performance, while Q4 provides insight into recent momentum and the immediate impact of wage revisions.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Gross Written Premium (GWP)

Grew 8.15% YoY to Rs. 47,174 Cr in FY26; Q4 FY26 GWP grew 1.63% YoY to Rs. 11,619 Cr.

Profit After Tax (PAT)

Improved 40% YoY to Rs. 1,384 Cr in FY26; Q4 FY26 PAT improved 61% YoY to Rs. 558 Cr.

Combined Ratio

Increased to 122.57% in FY26 from 116.78% in FY25; Q4 FY26 combined ratio was 118.34% vs 111.46% in Q4 FY25.

Incurred Claim Ratio (ICR)

Increased to 98.65% in FY26 from 96.61% in FY25; Q4 FY26 ICR was 95.85% vs 94.43% in Q4 FY25.

Management forward view

Optimistic FY27 Outlook

CMD remains optimistic about the Company’s growth prospects in FY27.

Strategic Focus

Strong focus on retail and MSME segments for future growth.

Diversification

Emphasis on growth in segments other than Motor and Health where competitive intensity is high.

Risk Management

Further impetus on risk management initiatives and taking steps to improve the global credit rating.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Combined Ratio122.57% (FY26)Watch for sustained improvement below 115% to indicate better underwriting profitability.
Motor TP Premium RevisionNot yet happenedMonitor for any regulatory updates on premium revisions in the Motor Third Party segment.
Investment Income ContributionRs. 11,112 Cr (FY26)Assess if investment income can continue to offset underwriting losses and drive PAT growth.
Solvency Ratio1.84x (FY26)Track for stability or improvement, as it declined slightly from 1.91x in FY25.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Show extracted source claims
margin outlookpartially delivered

Loss ratios are expected to improve in the second half of the financial year.

Timeframe: H2FY26Direction: improveConfidence: expected

"loss ratios are expected to improve in the second half of the financial year"

Outcome check: OPM moved from -0.6% to average 0.0% (+0.6 pp).

margin outlooknot yet verifiable

Loss ratios are expected to improve in the second half of the financial year.

Timeframe: H2FY26Direction: improveConfidence: expected

"loss ratios are expected to improve in the second half of the financial year"

market share expansionnot yet verifiable

The company intends to enter new lines of business, such as parametric insurance.

Timeframe: FY26Direction: expansionConfidence: implicit

"Entering new lines like parametric insurance"

market share expansionnot yet verifiable

The company intends to enter new lines of business, such as parametric insurance.

Timeframe: FY26Direction: expansionConfidence: implicit

"Entering new lines like parametric insurance"

operational efficiencynot yet verifiable

The company is taking steps to improve its global credit rating.

Timeframe: FY26Direction: improveConfidence: implicit

"taking steps to improve the global credit rating"

operational efficiencynot yet verifiable

The company is taking steps to improve its global credit rating.

Timeframe: FY26Direction: improveConfidence: implicit

"taking steps to improve the global credit rating"

operational efficiencynot yet verifiable

Claim automation efforts will continue for faster claim settlement.

Timeframe: ongoing/futureDirection: improveConfidence: implicit

"Claim automation efforts continue for faster claim settlement"

operational efficiencynot yet verifiable

Claim automation efforts will continue for faster claim settlement.

Timeframe: ongoing/futureDirection: improveConfidence: implicit

"Claim automation efforts continue for faster claim settlement"

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

78Bullish

full bull SMA stack · SMA20 +7.6% / mo · RSI overbought · MACD + · near 52W high

Stock trend: 78
Sector RS:

Technical chart

NIACLdaily · 1Y · AUTO+64.7%
Latest close ₹229.91 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+17.0%
RSI
79
MACD hist
3.24
52W pos
96%
2026-09-04O ₹196.49H ₹234.39L ₹196.49C ₹229.91Vol 6.7Cr sh
₹111.10₹143.39₹175.68₹207.97₹240.2652H52L229.912026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bullish setup

Trend is constructive — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 79.

  • Price > SMA20 > SMA50 > SMA200 — full bullish stack.
  • SMA20 rising (~7.0% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 79 — overbought zone; risk of mean reversion.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • Within 3% of 52-week high — testing resistance.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

90
RS percentile
Stage 2 Uptrend
1M return
+29.8%
3M return
+52.4%
6M return
+66.7%
1Y return
+19.2%
RS 1D
+16
RS 20D
+39
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#7
Stage evidence
  • Price is 41.4% above the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is above the 30-week proxy and its slope is rising +3.4%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are positive.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
Sector
neutral
Industry
neutral
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 120.76+17.70%
688195109123Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 26121
RS vs Nifty 500121

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 13 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

13U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth3/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet5/15
Cash Flow3/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
-1
Raw sum
13

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

13/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Balance sheet contributes 5/15 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 3/10 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 3/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.2, in distress territory.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 1 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -737.0%.
Sector valuation model

NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality

Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.

NBFC P/B
Primary lens
P/B adjusted for ROA/ROE and leverage quality.
Secondary checks
AUM growth, spreads, credit cost, liquidity and ALM risk.
Main risk check
Fast growth with weak asset quality deserves a discount.
PE
49.2
PB
EV/EBITDA
ROE
4.9%
ROCE
4.3%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
-737.0%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
13
Previous: 13
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-737.0%
Previous: -737.0%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -1 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
21
23
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
13

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
Growth-justified P/E
5.9
Growth-justified Value
₹27.47
-737.0% MoS
PEG

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
57Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Management has 100% delivered/partly-delivered outcomes on 2 checked claims. It ranks around the 20th percentile of the scored universe and 35th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 32/100.

Mixed Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 85.4%. Key concern: Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-4532 Cr.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
105 docs text-extracted · 28 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
20th percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 35th pctile, median 62 · Large: 11th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

105 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
100% delivered or partly delivered

2/6 claims checked · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
52
watch · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
62
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
32
weak · capital discipline
Results
53
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 85.4%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 6 years of positive FCF.
  • Debt/equity is 0.00.

Trust risks

  • Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-4532 Cr.
  • Altman Z is 1.17.
  • 2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ROCE is low at 4.3%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
49.20
P/B
EV/EBITDA
Market Cap
37889.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
4.92%
ROCE
4.29%
ROA
0.70%
Dividend Y
0.65%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
9.00%
EPS 5Y
-3.00%
Revenue 3Y
7.00%
EPS 3Y
99.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
1.17
Book Value

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
6/5
OCF
-4532.00 Cr
EPS TTM
4.68

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
85.44%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
96%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Financial Services, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.