Skip to content

Nectar Lifesciences Limited (NECLIFE)

Small Cap

Pharma stocks · Small cap · NSE

Nectar Lifesciences Limited operates in Hospitals / Diagnostics, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹11.06
+0.52 · +4.93%
Market cap ₹204 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result14 Aug, 08:47 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Pharma P/E 33.5 (n=187)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

63Bullish

SMA20 -10.3% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector +3.8pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 40
Sector RS: 98
Sector 3M: -1.8% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but the sector index is below its 100-session average. View sector evidence

Technical chart

NECLIFED candles · FIT view-6.2%
Latest close ₹11.06 on 2026-10-19
Bar
+1.5%
RSI
56
MACD hist
0.05
52W pos
13%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹10.90H ₹11.06L ₹10.85C ₹11.06Vol 1.6L sh
₹9.73₹11.09₹12.45₹13.80₹15.16₹11.062026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

NECLIFENifty PharmaNifty 500
-10%+1%+13%+24%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026NECLIFE +2.4%Nifty Pharma -1.5%Nifty 500 -5.6%
NECLIFE
+2.4%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Pharma
-1.5%
Vs Nifty 500
+8.0 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-50.6%
₹22.4
52W range position
13%
₹9.3 - ₹22.4
ATR (14)
4.4%
₹0.5
Volume vs 20D
1.21x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.1 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹10 - ₹11.2
40.1% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
25

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -100.0% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Bullish
63

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
—

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
59

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -100% YoY · margin compression

Filed 14 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹0 Cr-100.0%-100.0%
EBITDA₹-27 Cr-2600.0%+52.6%
Operating margin-6198.0%-618200 bps-176100 bps
PAT₹-15 CrNDFNDF
PAT marginNDFNDFNDF

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
—
P/B
0.35
EV/EBITDA
—
Market Cap
204.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
-31.30%
ROCE
0.05%
ROA
-39.39%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-20.00%
EPS 5Y
-20.00%
Revenue 3Y
-24.00%
EPS 3Y
-24.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
-2.39×
Altman Z
4.21
Book Value
30.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
421.08%
FCF Positive Y
11/5
OCF
-349.00 Cr
EPS TTM
-11.50

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
51.84%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
10%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 0.0-100.0% vs prev
0452.0Sep 2023: 398Dec 2023: 452Mar 2024: 441Jun 2024: 359Sep 2024: 6.0Dec 2024: 0.0Mar 2025: 0.0Jun 2025: 5.0Sep 2025: 1.0Dec 2025: 0.0Mar 2026: 1.0Jun 2026: 0.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -15.0+77.9% vs prev
-176.0014.0Sep 2023: 1.0Dec 2023: 2.0Mar 2024: 1.0Jun 2024: 3.0Sep 2024: 6.0Dec 2024: 8.0Mar 2025: -130Jun 2025: -63.0Sep 2025: -176Dec 2025: 14.0Mar 2026: -68.0Jun 2026: -15.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 56. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 falling (~11.5% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 56 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 51% off 52W high · 19% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

38
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
+0.7%
3M return
+2.4%
6M return
-9.5%
1Y return
-26.3%
RS 1D
+6
RS 20D
+5
Sector rank
#1
Industry rank
#17
Stage evidence
  • Price is 2.8% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -1.3%.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
leading
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 79.04+6.02%
6586108129151Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2679
RS vs Nifty 50079

Valuation & peers

U-Score 25 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

25U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation5/30
Growth1/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet11/15
Cash Flow9/10
Piotroski
3/9 (+1)
Penalties
-2
Raw sum
25

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

25/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 421.1%.
  • Cash flow contributes 9/10 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 11/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 2 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 1/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Healthcare valuation: PE/EVEBITDA with regulatory and pipeline checks

Healthcare valuation needs both earnings quality and regulatory/pipeline context.

Pharma PE/EVEBITDA
Primary lens
PE and EV/EBITDA adjusted for product mix and R&D/pipeline quality.
Secondary checks
USFDA risk, launch pipeline, margin trend, domestic vs export mix.
Main risk check
Regulatory setbacks or one-off product cycles can distort valuation.
PE
—
PB
0.3
EV/EBITDA
—
ROE
-31.3%
ROCE
0.1%
FCF Yield
421.1%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
—
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
25
Previous: 25
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
—
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
2.4
Growth-justified Value
—
— MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Pharma — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
LOTUSEYE
Small
Lotus Eye Hospital and Institute Limited
Healthcare Services
match 165
13
1504.0
0.1%
-161992%
OVERVALUED
NATCAPSUQ
Small
Natural Capsules Limited
Healthcare Services
match 164
52
13.5
6.5%
+71%
FAIR VALUE
LYKALABS
Small
Lyka Labs Limited
Healthcare Services
match 164
20
—
-10.2%
—
OVERVALUED
MEDICO
Small
Medico Remedies Limited
Healthcare Services
match 163
65
13.0
19.0%
+71%
UNDERVALUED
VINEETLAB
Small
Vineet Laboratories Limited
Healthcare Services
match 160
5
65.0
3.7%
-1551%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Nectar Lifesciences Limited operates in Hospitals / Diagnostics, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
59Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 25th percentile of the scored universe and 16th percentile within Pharma. Main check: results consistency is weak at 5/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
11 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
25th percentile

overall median 67 · Pharma: 16th pctile, median 70 · Small: 28th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

11 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
82
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
74
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
88
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
30
weak · capital discipline
Results
5
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸Promoter holding increased 6.9%.
  • ▸FCF yield is 362.5%.
  • ▸11 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-349 Cr.
  • ▸3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 0.1%.
  • ▸ROE is low at -31.3%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 21 Aug - Please find attached herewith newspaper publication of notice of 31st Annual General Meeting, e-voting, book closure & other information.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 16 Jun - Please find attached herewith copy of newspaper publication as per Section 124(6) of Companies Act, 2013

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 1 Jun - Please find attached herewith the copy of newspapers for publication of financial results of the Company for the quarter and financial year ended on March …

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.