Skip to content

Lotus Eye Hospital and Institute Limited (LOTUSEYE)

Small Cap

Pharma stocks · Small cap · NSE

Lotus Eye Hospital and Institute Limited operates in Hospitals / Diagnostics, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹110.06
-4.30 · -3.76%
Market cap ₹241 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals03 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 01:42 am IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Pharma P/E 33.5 (n=187)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

65Bullish

SMA20 +1.6% / mo · MACD − · sector +3.8pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 42
Sector RS: 98
Sector 3M: -1.8% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but the sector index is below its 100-session average. View sector evidence

Technical chart

LOTUSEYED candles · FIT view-8.6%
Latest close ₹110.06 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-4.3%
RSI
45
MACD hist
-0.32
52W pos
25%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹114.99H ₹114.99L ₹109.50C ₹110.06Vol 63,022 sh
₹98.91₹110.51₹122.11₹133.71₹145.31₹110.062026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

LOTUSEYENifty PharmaNifty 500
-13%-7%-0%+6%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026LOTUSEYE -9.4%Nifty Pharma -1.5%Nifty 500 -5.6%
LOTUSEYE
-9.4%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Pharma
-1.5%
Vs Nifty 500
-3.8 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-25.1%
₹147
52W range position
25%
₹97.6 - ₹147
ATR (14)
4.1%
₹4.5
Volume vs 20D
4.22x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.2 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹106 - ₹117.9
36.7% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, while price trend supports entry. This looks more like momentum/speculation than a clean fundamental investment setup.

Weak U-Score but strong trend: momentum may be ahead of fundamentals.

Suggested next step
Momentum only
Trend is strong but fundamentals do not support a clean investment thesis.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
13

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Excellent
75

Revenue +26.2% · PAT +13.0% YoY

Technical
Bullish
65

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-161991.8%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
53

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Excellent · 75/100

Rev +26% YoY · PAT +13% YoY · margin expansion · +25% QoQ

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹17.1 Cr+26.2%+25.4%
EBITDA₹3 Cr+99.3%+514.6%
Operating margin17.3%+634 bps+1376 bps
PAT₹0.6 Cr+13.0%NDF
PAT margin3.6%-41 bps+593 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
1504.00
P/B
4.01
EV/EBITDA
27.24
Market Cap
241.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
0.13%
ROCE
1.41%
ROA
0.18%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
11.00%
EPS 5Y
-44.00%
Revenue 3Y
5.00%
EPS 3Y
-73.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.26
Interest Coverage
3.89×
Altman Z
7.82
Book Value
28.90

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
9/5
OCF
3.02 Cr
EPS TTM
0.07

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
40.14%
Promoter Pledge
87.20%
Momentum 52W
33%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 17.1+25.3% vs prev
017.1Sep 2023: 12.7Dec 2023: 12.0Mar 2024: 10.9Jun 2024: 12.9Sep 2024: 12.9Dec 2024: 12.3Mar 2025: 11.5Jun 2025: 13.5Sep 2025: 13.0Dec 2025: 13.6Mar 2026: 13.6Jun 2026: 17.1Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 0.6+290.6% vs prev
-0.300.8Sep 2023: 0.8Dec 2023: 0.7Mar 2024: 0.0Jun 2024: 0.6Sep 2024: 0.1Dec 2024: -0.2Mar 2025: 0.3Jun 2025: 0.5Sep 2025: 0.1Dec 2025: -0.3Mar 2026: -0.3Jun 2026: 0.6Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 45. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 rising (~1.6% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 45 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 25% off 52W high · 13% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

50
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-4.4%
3M return
-9.4%
6M return
-7.5%
1Y return
-8.4%
RS 1D
-7
RS 20D
-1
Sector rank
#1
Industry rank
#17
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 4.5% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +0.6% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
leading
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 95.96-2.76%
8291101110119Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2696
RS vs Nifty 50096

Valuation & peers

U-Score 13 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

13U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth4/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet3/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
13

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

13/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 3/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Promoter pledge is 87.2%.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -161991.8%.
Sector valuation model

Healthcare valuation: PE/EVEBITDA with regulatory and pipeline checks

Healthcare valuation needs both earnings quality and regulatory/pipeline context.

Pharma PE/EVEBITDA
Primary lens
PE and EV/EBITDA adjusted for product mix and R&D/pipeline quality.
Secondary checks
USFDA risk, launch pipeline, margin trend, domestic vs export mix.
Main risk check
Regulatory setbacks or one-off product cycles can distort valuation.
PE
1504.0
PB
4.0
EV/EBITDA
27.2
ROE
0.1%
ROCE
1.4%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.3
MoS
-161991.8%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
13
Previous: 13
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-161991.8%
Previous: -161991.8%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹6.75
-1531.3% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
1.0
Growth-justified Value
₹0.07
-161991.8% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Pharma — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
LYKALABS
Small
Lyka Labs Limited
Healthcare Services
match 166
20
—
-10.2%
—
OVERVALUED
NECLIFE
Small
Nectar Lifesciences Limited
Healthcare Services
match 165
25
—
-31.3%
—
OVERVALUED
NATCAPSUQ
Small
Natural Capsules Limited
Healthcare Services
match 162
52
13.5
6.5%
+71%
FAIR VALUE
MEDICO
Small
Medico Remedies Limited
Healthcare Services
match 161
65
13.0
19.0%
+71%
UNDERVALUED
VINEETLAB
Small
Vineet Laboratories Limited
Healthcare Services
match 160
5
65.0
3.7%
-1551%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Lotus Eye Hospital and Institute Limited operates in Hospitals / Diagnostics, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
53Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 12th percentile of the scored universe and 8th percentile within Pharma. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 30/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
6 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
12th percentile

overall median 67 · Pharma: 8th pctile, median 70 · Small: 14th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

6 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
35
weak · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
81
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
30
weak · capital discipline
Results
50
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸9 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸Promoters have pledged 87.2% of holding.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 1.2%.
  • ▸ROE is low at 0.1%.
  • ▸ROCE trend is -2.6%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
Annual report

Reg. 34 (1) Annual Report. 1 Sep - FY26 annual report notes turnover growth and commencement of Gobichettipalayam eye care centre.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Press Release / Media Release 27 Aug - Lotus Eye Hospital launches Lotus Optique optical store at SITRA campus, Coimbatore.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual report

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 1 Sep - Newspaper Advertisements published for 29th Annual General Meeting of the Company and Annual Report for the financial year 2025-26.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.