IP
IndiaPulse

Maruti Suzuki India Limited (MARUTI)

Large Cap

Auto stocks · Large cap · NSE

Maruti Suzuki India Limited (MSIL) is an Indian automobile manufacturer. Its wholly owned subsidiary, Suzuki Motor Gujarat Private Limited (SMG), amalgamated with MSIL effective April 1, 2025, with financials restated for comparison.

₹12,694
-163.00 · -1.27%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Auto P/E 26.5 (n=128)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Mixed fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
FAIR VALUE
56

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
79

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bearish
25

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
stable
75

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -9% YoY · margin compression · Rev +36% YoY

Filed 31 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹52,470 Cr+35.9%+0.0%
EBITDA₹4,313 Cr-6.7%-30.0%
Operating margin8.0%-400 bps-400 bps
PAT₹3,447 Cr-9.1%-5.8%
PAT margin6.6%-325 bps-40 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-03T15:38:08.527Z
Management commentary snapshot

Q4 FY26 sales volume grew 11.8% YoY, with Net Sales up 28.9% YoY, but PAT declined 6.9% YoY due to adverse commodity prices and lower non-operating income. FY26 saw 8.4% volume growth and 20.2% Net Sales growth, but PAT increased only 1.0% YoY.

Despite robust volume and revenue growth in Q4 and FY26, profitability was significantly impacted by adverse commodity prices and lower non-operating income. The company's ability to pass on costs and improve margins will be key for thesis revalidation.

Current business mix

Domestic Sales Volume by Segment (Q4 FY26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 6 reported categories.

Businessmix
Mini6.7%
Compact39.1%
UVs40.8%
Vans6.5%
LCV1.9%
Sales to other OEM5.0%
Growth engines

Exports

Exports volume surged by 61.3% YoY in Q4 FY26 and 34.6% YoY in FY26, contributing significantly to overall volume growth.

Utility Vehicles (UVs)

UV segment domestic sales grew 14.9% YoY in Q4 FY26 and 5.7% YoY in FY26, becoming the largest domestic segment at 40.8% in Q4.

Operating Leverage

Favourable operating leverage was a positive factor for Q4 FY26 YoY margin movement.

Tailwinds

Operating Leverage

Favourable operating leverage contributed positively to Q4 FY26 YoY margin movement.

Lower Sales Promotion & Advertisement

Lower sales promotion & advertisement expenses positively impacted Q4 FY26 YoY margins.

Favourable Foreign Exchange Movement

Favourable foreign exchange movement positively impacted Q4 FY26 QoQ margins.

Headwinds

Adverse Commodity Prices

Adverse commodity prices negatively impacted margins in both Q4 FY26 YoY and QoQ, and for the full year FY26.

Lower Non-Operating Income

Lower non-operating income negatively impacted PBT and PAT in Q4 FY26 YoY and QoQ, and for the full year FY26.

New Model Expenses

New model expenses negatively impacted Q4 FY26 QoQ margins.

Higher Manufacturing & Admin Expenses

Higher manufacturing and administrative expenses negatively impacted Q4 FY26 QoQ margins.

Risk radar

Commodity Price Volatility

Adverse commodity prices have been a consistent negative factor impacting profitability across Q4 and FY26.

Non-Operating Income Dependence

Significant decline in non-operating income negatively impacted PBT and PAT, indicating potential reliance on this income stream.

New Model Cost Management

New model expenses negatively impacted Q4 FY26 QoQ margins, suggesting potential pressure on profitability from product launches.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

The document provides both Q4 YoY and QoQ comparisons, which are crucial for understanding recent trends and sequential momentum. Annual (FY) YoY comparison is also provided, essential for assessing full-year performance.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Volume Growth (Q4 YoY)

Total Sales Volume increased by 11.8% to 676,209 units in Q4 FY26 compared to Q4 FY25.

Volume Growth (FY YoY)

Total Sales Volume increased by 8.4% to 2,422,713 units in FY26 compared to FY25.

Realization (Q4 YoY)

Net Sales increased by 28.9% in Q4 FY26, significantly outpacing 11.8% volume growth, indicating improved realization.

Op. EBITDA Margin (FY YoY)

Operating EBITDA margin for FY26 was 12.3%, down 160 bps from 13.9% in FY25.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Commodity Price TrendAdverse commodity pricesMovement in key raw material costs and their impact on gross margins.
Non-Operating IncomeLower non-operating incomeStability and growth of non-operating income sources.
UV Segment GrowthUVs grew 14.9% YoY in Q4 FY26Sustained growth rate and market share in the UV segment.
Export MomentumExports surged 61.3% YoY in Q4 FY26Continued strong performance in export markets.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

25Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -2.0% / mo · RSI oversold · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -3.3pp vs Nifty (3M)

Stock trend: 22
Sector RS: 31
Sector 3M: -4.8% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

MARUTIdaily · 1Y · AUTO-11.9%
Latest close ₹12694.00 on 2026-09-04
Bar
-1.4%
RSI
27
MACD hist
-107.59
52W pos
10%
2026-09-04O ₹12880.00H ₹12880.00L ₹12656.00C ₹12694.00Vol 3.2L sh
₹12.04k₹12.91k₹13.78k₹14.65k₹15.52k52L12694.002026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 27.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~2.1% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 27 — oversold zone; bounce conditions.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

27
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-9.6%
3M return
-3.2%
6M return
-2.4%
1Y return
-18.5%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
-16
Sector rank
#6
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 6.6% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed -1.9% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
weakening
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 95.95-1.27%
94103111120128Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2696
RS vs Nifty 50096

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 56 · FAIR VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

56U-SCORE
Financial Turnaround

Fundamental score breakdown

FAIR VALUE
Valuation7/30
Growth16/25
Quality9/20
Balance Sheet11/15
Cash Flow7/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
56

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

56/100 · FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 30.0%.
  • Balance sheet contributes 11/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Valuation is weaker at 7/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 9/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 16/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
27.8
PB
3.7
EV/EBITDA
14.2
ROE
14.3%
ROCE
18.9%
FCF Yield
1.1%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+30.0%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
56
Previous: 56
Verdict
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+30.0%
Previous: +30.0%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +3 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
54
54
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
56

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹5,912.63
-114.7% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
39.8
Growth-justified Value
₹18,122.42
+30.0% MoS
PEG
1.13

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
79Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 88th percentile of the scored universe and 75th percentile within Auto. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 58/100.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 58.7%. Key concern: ROCE trend is -2.1%.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
50 docs text-extracted · 1 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
88th percentile

overall median 67 · Auto: 75th pctile, median 74 · Large: 74th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

50 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
58
watch · capital discipline
Results
75
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 58.7%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 1.1%.
  • 12 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ROCE trend is -2.1%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
27.80
P/B
3.72
EV/EBITDA
14.21
Market Cap
399103.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
14.30%
ROCE
18.90%
ROA
9.63%
Dividend Y
1.10%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
21.00%
EPS 5Y
27.00%
Revenue 3Y
16.00%
EPS 3Y
21.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
82.87×
Altman Z
8.80
Book Value
3408.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
1.09%
FCF Positive Y
12/5
OCF
19100.00 Cr
EPS TTM
455.91

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
58.65%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
10%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Auto, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.