IP
IndiaPulse

Larsen & Toubro Limited (LT)

Large Cap

Infra stocks · Large cap · NSE

Larsen & Toubro Limited (LT) is an Indian conglomerate engaged in Projects and Manufacturing, IT and Technology Services, Financial Services, Development Projects, and Realty. It operates primarily in India and the Middle East, focusing on infrastructure, energy, and high-tech manufacturing.

₹3,964.1
-10.90 · -0.27%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Infra P/E 16.9 (n=83)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
30

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
70

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
53

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
stable
75

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 27/100

margin compression · Rev +7% YoY · PAT +16% YoY · operating leverage

Filed 28 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹67,942 Cr+6.7%-17.9%
EBITDA₹8,149 Cr+1.6%-21.8%
Operating margin12.0%-100 bps-100 bps
PAT₹4,988 Cr+15.5%-18.7%
PAT margin7.3%+56 bps-7 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T15:27:31.559Z
Management commentary snapshot

Q4 FY26 order inflows broadly flat YoY, group revenues up 11% YoY, and recurring PAT up 5% YoY. Full year FY26 order inflows significantly surpassed guidance, while revenue growth missed target due to West Asia conflict and domestic project delays.

L&T delivered strong FY26 order inflows, surpassing guidance, and built a robust order book. Q4 revenue and P&M margins were impacted by West Asia conflict disruptions and domestic project delays. Management expects H1 FY27 to be subdued but anticipates H2 pickup and has a clear long-term strategic plan (Lakshya 31) with significant capex in new growth areas.

Growth engines

Energy Transition & Core National Infrastructure

Benefited from ongoing opportunities in energy transition and core national infrastructure projects in the Middle East.

Domestic Private Sector Ordering

Strong momentum in Buildings and Factories, Minerals and Metals, and Heavy Civil Infrastructure businesses.

Data Center Business (L&T Vyoma)

Commissioned 12 MW capacity at Kanchipuram, with an additional 6 MW at an advanced stage of commissioning, bringing total to 30 MW.

Green Energy (Lakshya 31)

Development Projects portfolio reoriented towards asset ownership in Green Hydrogen and Green Ammonia manufacturing facilities under a BOO framework.

Capacity and execution

Data Center Capacity

Commissioned 12 MW at Kanchipuram, with an additional 6 MW at an advanced stage, bringing total available capacity to 30 MW. Target 200 MW over time.

Hydrocarbon Modular Fabrication Yard & Shipbuilding Facility

Plan to invest around Rs 50 billion for upgradation.

Tailwinds

Indian Economic Growth

FY27 expected around 6.9%, supported by resilient household demand, sustained public capital expenditure, and continued strength in services.

Middle East Resilience

GCC has demonstrated resilience, underpinned by low public debt levels, substantial foreign exchange reserves, and strong sovereign balance sheets.

Domestic Private Sector Capex

Increasingly structural and sustainable with enterprises sharply focused on disciplined execution and return focus.

Energy Transition Acceleration

Accelerating as a strategic risk hedge, driving opportunities in renewables, battery energy storage systems, and grid infrastructure.

Headwinds

West Asia Conflict

Near-term impact on execution primarily due to supply chain constraints, increased logistics and insurance costs.

Subdued Domestic Project Execution

Subdued execution progress in certain domestic projects, particularly Water and Effluent Treatment business, and delays from pending clearances.

Global Economic Fragmentation

Continues to influence trade flows, investment activity, and overall sentiment.

Risk radar

Geopolitical Developments

External headwinds including geopolitical developments, global energy supply dynamics, and financial market volatility.

Supply Chain Disruptions

The biggest risk from the West Asia conflict, impacting material movement and execution, though continuously improving.

Inflation and Logistics Costs

Logistics and insurance costs have increased materially; active discussions with clients to seek appropriate relief.

Legacy Project Cost Overruns

Cost overruns and closeout costs in legacy projects impacted the Energy segment margin in Q4 FY26.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY is crucial for assessing annual performance and comparing against previous fiscal periods, especially for full-year targets. QoQ (or sequential trends) is relevant for understanding the immediate impact of geopolitical events and project execution momentum, particularly for Q4 which is a peak execution period.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Order Inflows (Q4 FY26)

Rs 898 billion, broadly in line with Q4 FY25 levels. Projects and Manufacturing portfolio recorded Rs 699 billion, down 3% YoY.

Order Inflows (FY26)

Significantly surpassed the guided growth of 10% for FY26, driven by strong order wins across multiple sectors.

Order Book (as of March 2026)

Rs 7.40 trillion, a 28% YoY increase, providing strong revenue visibility.

Group Revenues (Q4 FY26)

Rs 828 billion, registered a YoY growth of 11%.

Management forward view

FY27 Guidance

Expects group order inflows and revenue to grow in the range of 10% to 12%. Projects, Products and Manufacturing (PP&M) margin expected to be stable at 7.8%. Working capital around 10%.

Lakshya 31 (FY27-FY31) Targets

Targeting order inflow CAGR of 10-12%, revenue growth of 12-15%, and Return on Equity in the range of 16-17%.

H1 FY27 Outlook

Anticipates a softer first half primarily due to current supply chain disruptions, with a pickup happening in the second half as constraints ease.

Middle East Capex Outlook

Capex narrative is quite positive; expects many more projects to be announced in the next few quarters.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Revenue Growth (H1 FY27)Anticipated softer H1 FY27 due to supply chain disruptions.Actual revenue growth in H1 FY27 and signs of pickup in H2 as constraints ease.
Middle East Project ExecutionNear-term impact on execution due to supply chain constraints.Easing of supply chain constraints and successful negotiations with clients for cost compensation.
Water Projects Execution & CollectionsSubdued progress in FY26, with some improvement in collections in Q4.Sustained improvement in execution momentum and collections in FY27.
PP&M Margin StabilityGuided stable at 7.8% for FY27.Actual margin performance, especially in the Energy segment post closeout of legacy projects.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

53Neutral

SMA20 +3.9% / mo · MACD − · sector +2.3pp vs Nifty (3M)

Stock trend: 48
Sector RS: 61
Sector 3M: +0.8% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

LTdaily · 1Y · AUTO-1.8%
Latest close ₹3964.10 on 2026-09-04
Bar
-0.4%
RSI
42
MACD hist
-16.11
52W pos
59%
2026-09-04O ₹3981.00H ₹3994.90L ₹3964.10C ₹3964.10Vol 13.2L sh
₹3.24k₹3.51k₹3.78k₹4.05k₹4.32k52L3964.102026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 42.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • Recent death cross (SMA50 crossed below SMA200).
  • SMA20 rising (~3.7% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 42 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 11% off 52W high · 21% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

59
RS percentile
Stage 3 Topping
1M return
-2.3%
3M return
+1.6%
6M return
+6.6%
1Y return
+8.1%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
+2
Sector rank
#15
Industry rank
#22
Stage evidence
  • 10.3% below the 52-week closing high after prior strength.
  • The 30-week proxy has stalled (+0.5% over 20 sessions).
  • Price has not yet confirmed a full Stage 4 downtrend.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
improving
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 104.37-0.28%
9399104110116Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 26104
RS vs Nifty 500104

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 30 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

30U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth9/25
Quality10/20
Balance Sheet2/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
30

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

30/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Quality contributes 10/20 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -235.8%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 2/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
31.0
PB
5.0
EV/EBITDA
16.5
ROE
15.9%
ROCE
14.6%
FCF Yield
1.0%
Debt/Equity
1.1
MoS
-235.8%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
30
Previous: 30
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-235.8%
Previous: -235.8%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
33
33
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹1,467.77
-170.1% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
9.8
Growth-justified Value
₹1,180.58
-235.8% MoS
PEG
6.46

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
70Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 63rd percentile of the scored universe and 69th percentile within Infra. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 53/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: Debt/equity is 1.15.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
161 docs text-extracted · 32 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
63rd percentile

overall median 67 · Infra: 69th pctile, median 64 · Large: 41st pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

161 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
53
watch · leverage and solvency
Discipline
68
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
75
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 1%.
  • 5 years of positive FCF.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • Debt/equity is 1.15.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
31.00
P/B
4.99
EV/EBITDA
16.51
Market Cap
545407.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
15.90%
ROCE
14.60%
ROA
4.34%
Dividend Y
0.96%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
16.00%
EPS 5Y
3.00%
Revenue 3Y
16.00%
EPS 3Y
17.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
1.15
Interest Coverage
3.65×
Altman Z
2.28
Book Value
794.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.98%
FCF Positive Y
5/5
OCF
16741.00 Cr
EPS TTM
120.59

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
59%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Infra, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.