Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Award_of_Order_Receipt_of_Order 7 Oct - L&T Energy CarbonLite secures LNTP for 2x800 MW Chandrapura thermal power plant in Jharkhand.
Source: Bse
Infra stocks · Large cap · NSE
Larsen & Toubro Limited (LT) is an Indian conglomerate engaged in Projects and Manufacturing, IT and Technology Services, Financial Services, Development Projects, and Realty. It operates primarily in India and the Middle East, focusing on infrastructure, energy, and high-tech manufacturing.
full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -5.9% / mo · MACD − · sector -2.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)
FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but the sector index is below its 100-session average. View sector evidence
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue +6.7% · PAT +15.5% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
margin compression · Rev +7% YoY · PAT +16% YoY · operating leverage
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹67,942 Cr | +6.7% | -17.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹8,149 Cr | +1.6% | -21.8% |
| Operating margin | 12.0% | -100 bps | -100 bps |
| PAT | ₹4,988 Cr | +15.5% | -18.7% |
| PAT margin | 7.3% | +56 bps | -7 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 20/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 41. Wait for confirmation.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 32 · legacy U-Score band WATCHLIST · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Infra — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Q4 FY26 order inflows broadly flat YoY, group revenues up 11% YoY, and recurring PAT up 5% YoY. Full year FY26 order inflows significantly surpassed guidance, while revenue growth missed target due to West Asia conflict and domestic project delays.
L&T delivered strong FY26 order inflows, surpassing guidance, and built a robust order book. Q4 revenue and P&M margins were impacted by West Asia conflict disruptions and domestic project delays. Management expects H1 FY27 to be subdued but anticipates H2 pickup and has a clear long-term strategic plan (Lakshya 31) with significant capex in new growth areas.
Benefited from ongoing opportunities in energy transition and core national infrastructure projects in the Middle East.
Strong momentum in Buildings and Factories, Minerals and Metals, and Heavy Civil Infrastructure businesses.
Commissioned 12 MW capacity at Kanchipuram, with an additional 6 MW at an advanced stage of commissioning, bringing total to 30 MW.
Development Projects portfolio reoriented towards asset ownership in Green Hydrogen and Green Ammonia manufacturing facilities under a BOO framework.
Commissioned 12 MW at Kanchipuram, with an additional 6 MW at an advanced stage, bringing total available capacity to 30 MW. Target 200 MW over time.
Plan to invest around Rs 50 billion for upgradation.
FY27 expected around 6.9%, supported by resilient household demand, sustained public capital expenditure, and continued strength in services.
GCC has demonstrated resilience, underpinned by low public debt levels, substantial foreign exchange reserves, and strong sovereign balance sheets.
Increasingly structural and sustainable with enterprises sharply focused on disciplined execution and return focus.
Accelerating as a strategic risk hedge, driving opportunities in renewables, battery energy storage systems, and grid infrastructure.
Near-term impact on execution primarily due to supply chain constraints, increased logistics and insurance costs.
Subdued execution progress in certain domestic projects, particularly Water and Effluent Treatment business, and delays from pending clearances.
Continues to influence trade flows, investment activity, and overall sentiment.
External headwinds including geopolitical developments, global energy supply dynamics, and financial market volatility.
The biggest risk from the West Asia conflict, impacting material movement and execution, though continuously improving.
Logistics and insurance costs have increased materially; active discussions with clients to seek appropriate relief.
Cost overruns and closeout costs in legacy projects impacted the Energy segment margin in Q4 FY26.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
YoY is crucial for assessing annual performance and comparing against previous fiscal periods, especially for full-year targets. QoQ (or sequential trends) is relevant for understanding the immediate impact of geopolitical events and project execution momentum, particularly for Q4 which is a peak execution period.
Rs 898 billion, broadly in line with Q4 FY25 levels. Projects and Manufacturing portfolio recorded Rs 699 billion, down 3% YoY.
Significantly surpassed the guided growth of 10% for FY26, driven by strong order wins across multiple sectors.
Rs 7.40 trillion, a 28% YoY increase, providing strong revenue visibility.
Rs 828 billion, registered a YoY growth of 11%.
Expects group order inflows and revenue to grow in the range of 10% to 12%. Projects, Products and Manufacturing (PP&M) margin expected to be stable at 7.8%. Working capital around 10%.
Targeting order inflow CAGR of 10-12%, revenue growth of 12-15%, and Return on Equity in the range of 16-17%.
Anticipates a softer first half primarily due to current supply chain disruptions, with a pickup happening in the second half as constraints ease.
Capex narrative is quite positive; expects many more projects to be announced in the next few quarters.
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (H1 FY27) | Anticipated softer H1 FY27 due to supply chain disruptions. | Actual revenue growth in H1 FY27 and signs of pickup in H2 as constraints ease. |
| Middle East Project Execution | Near-term impact on execution due to supply chain constraints. | Easing of supply chain constraints and successful negotiations with clients for cost compensation. |
| Water Projects Execution & Collections | Subdued progress in FY26, with some improvement in collections in Q4. | Sustained improvement in execution momentum and collections in FY27. |
| PP&M Margin Stability | Guided stable at 7.8% for FY27. | Actual margin performance, especially in the Energy segment post closeout of legacy projects. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 63rd percentile of the scored universe and 68th percentile within Infra. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 53/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Infra: 68th pctile, median 64 · Large: 40th pctile, median 73
179 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse